Luminous Silk Hydrating Face and Under-Eye Concealer 3 dupes and alternatives Armani Beauty
4.4 (2,347)·Light medium · Warm · golden undertone
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar concealer overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar concealer on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar concealer on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
$36Ulta Beauty(product price)$6 less (14%)4.5 (515)
Matches: Very close colour· Same radiant finish· Both claim a skin-like finish
Differences: Slightly lighter· Neutral rather than warm undertone· Medium-full rather than medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish & visual result
85
Wear & performance
80
Skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Radiant · Medium-full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Neutral rather than warm undertone · Medium-full rather than medium coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: fair/medium with neutral undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Same radiant finish· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Slightly lighter· Neutral rather than warm undertone· Buildable rather than medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
82
Skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Radiant · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Neutral rather than warm undertone · Buildable rather than medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed
$31Ulta Beauty(product price)$11 less (26%)4.3 (1,273)
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim long-wearing· Claims not settling into lines
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone· Luminous rather than radiant finish· Buildable rather than medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish & visual result
71
Wear & performance
82
Skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Luminous · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone · Luminous rather than radiant finish · Buildable rather than medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed
Retailer shade note: for very light cool skin with pink undertones
Matches: Same warm undertone· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Slightly lighter· Natural rather than radiant finish· Full rather than medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish & visual result
58
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
50
Close colour · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Natural rather than radiant finish · Full rather than medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: fair skin with warm yellow undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim long-wearing· Claims not settling into lines
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Full rather than medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish & visual result
52
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Full rather than medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel
$30Ulta Beauty(product price)$12 less (29%)4.2 (7,617)
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim long-wearing· Claims not settling into lines
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Full rather than medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish & visual result
52
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Full rather than medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Full rather than medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish & visual result
58
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
50
Close colour · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Full rather than medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: fair to light skin with neutral undertones
$31Ulta Beauty(product price)$11 less (26%)4.3 (1,273)
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Described as light, yours as very fair· Luminous rather than radiant finish· Buildable rather than medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
40
Finish & visual result
71
Wear & performance
82
Skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Luminous · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Described as light, yours as very fair · Luminous rather than radiant finish · Buildable rather than medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed
Retailer shade note: for light warm skin with yellow undertones
Low confidence· Digital matchRetailer descriptions disagree: described as light, yours as very fair
$31Ulta Beauty(product price)$11 less (26%)4.3 (1,273)
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim long-wearing· Claims not settling into lines
Differences: Described as medium tan, yours as very fair· Neutral rather than warm undertone· Luminous rather than radiant finish
Score details
Shade match
40
Finish & visual result
71
Wear & performance
82
Skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Luminous · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Described as medium tan, yours as very fair · Neutral rather than warm undertone · Luminous rather than radiant finish · Buildable rather than medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed
Retailer shade note: for medium-tan neutral skin with peach undertones
Low confidence· Digital matchRetailer descriptions disagree: described as medium tan, yours as very fair
The closest shade to Armani Beauty Luminous Silk Hydrating Face and Under-Eye Concealer 3 (Light medium · Warm · golden undertone) in each foundation range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Foundation shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest shade match works
IT Cosmetics Bye Bye Under Eye Full Coverage Anti-Aging Water-Resistant Concealer in 14.0 Light Tan, against Armani Beauty Luminous Silk Hydrating Face and Under-Eye Concealer in 3. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade3Closest shade match14.0 Light TanHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall89
Colour60%85#dbb289#e1bc99Close colourColour difference 3.0 (0 is identical)
Finish35%56RadiantNaturalSome differenceNatural finish rather than radiant
Coverage30%60MediumFullSome differenceFull coverage rather than medium
Skin-like finish20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a skin-like finish; the match does not list it
Blurring15%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a blurring or smoothing effect; the match does not list it
Wear & performance15% of overall · 3 of 5 compared68
Longevity30%100Long-wearingLong-wearingSameBoth products claim long wear
Transfer resistance20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Settling20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims not settling into pores or fine lines; your product does not list it
Colour stability15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists colour stability (no oxidation)
Comfort15%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a comfortable, lightweight feel; the match does not list it
Skin suitability5% of overall50
Skin type100%50Not publishedNormal, dry, combination, oily, sensitiveSkin-type suitability not published for one product
Overall match 75/100Shade match 89/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Glossier Stretch Concealer for Dewy Buildable Coverage in Medium 3, against Armani Beauty Luminous Silk Hydrating Face and Under-Eye Concealer in 3. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade3Closest overall alternativeMedium 3How they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall87
Colour60%79#dbb289#e3b179Close colourColour difference 3.8 (0 is identical)
Coverage30%100MediumBuildableCloseBuildable coverage rather than medium (buildable: one step of tolerance)
Skin-like finish20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a skin-like finish; the match does not list it
Blurring15%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a blurring or smoothing effect; the match does not list it
Wear & performance15% of overall · 3 of 5 compared82
Longevity30%100Long-wearingLong-wearingSameBoth products claim long wear
Transfer resistance20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Settling20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims not settling into pores or fine lines; your product does not list it
Colour stability15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists colour stability (no oxidation)
Comfort15%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable, lightweight feel
Skin suitability5% of overall50
Skin type100%50Not publishedNot publishedSkin-type suitability not published for one product
Overall match 82/100Shade match 87/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Sephora
Ulta Beauty(product price)$6 less (14%)
