Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar bronzer overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 25%, wear and performance 15%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar bronzer on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar bronzer on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Very close colour· Same finish: natural· Claims comfort
Differences: Cream rather than powder (format)· Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)· Dry, Combination, Oily rather than normal, combination, oily (skin types)
Score details
Shade match
92
Finish, pigmentation & format
78
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
48
Very close colour · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cream rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Dry, Combination, Oily rather than normal, combination, oily (skin types)
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Same finish: natural· Claims comfort
Differences: Stick rather than powder (format)· Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)· Dry, Combination, Oily rather than normal, combination, oily (skin types)
Score details
Shade match
89
Finish, pigmentation & format
78
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
48
Close colour · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Stick rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Dry, Combination, Oily rather than normal, combination, oily (skin types)
Retailer shade note: neutral/olive undertone, natural finish for tan skin tones
Matches: Very close colour· Same neutral undertone· Same format: powder
Differences: Golden rather than bronze· 12-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)· Normal, Dry, Oily rather than normal, combination, oily (skin types)
Score details
Shade match
93
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
35
Comfort & skin suitability
48
Very close colour · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Golden rather than bronze · 12-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than normal, combination, oily (skin types)
Matches: Very close colour· Same format: powder· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Cool rather than neutral undertone· 12-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)· Normal, Combination, Sensitive rather than normal, combination, oily (skin types)
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
38
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than neutral undertone · 12-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Normal, Combination, Sensitive rather than normal, combination, oily (skin types)
Matches: Very close colour· Same finish: natural· Claims comfort
Differences: Liquid rather than powder (format)· Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)· Normal, Dry, Combination rather than normal, combination, oily (skin types)
Score details
Shade match
93
Finish, pigmentation & format
73
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
48
Very close colour · Natural · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Liquid rather than powder (format) · Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than normal, combination, oily (skin types)
Retailer shade note: natural skin-like finish for dark skin tones
Matches: Same finish: natural· Claims comfort· Claims hydration
Differences: Stick rather than powder (format)· Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)· Normal, Dry, Combination rather than normal, combination, oily (skin types)
Score details
Shade match
89
Finish, pigmentation & format
78
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
48
Close colour · Natural · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Stick rather than powder (format) · Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than normal, combination, oily (skin types)
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same format: powder· Claims comfort
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone· Rose rather than bronze· 12-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
35
Comfort & skin suitability
48
Looks identical · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone · Rose rather than bronze · 12-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than normal, combination, oily (skin types)
Dior Forever Nude Bronze in 30 Tan Matte, against Armani Beauty Luminous Silk Creamy Bronzing Powder in 120 sunbathed dune. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade120 sunbathed duneClosest shade match30 Tan MatteHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall97
Colour55%95#a2664e#a06953Looks identicalColour difference 1.4 (0 is identical)
Depth25%99Deep / darkDeep / darkSameDepth difference 0.8 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNeutralNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family20%100BronzeBronzeSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format25% of overall · 2 of 3 compared85
Finish50%78NaturalMatteCloseMatte finish rather than natural
Pigmentation25%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists an opacity
Format25%100PowderPowderSameBoth powder
Wear & performance15% of overall · 2 of 3 compared61
Longevity50%7024-hour wearLong-wearingSome differenceYour product claims 24-hour wear; the match says long-wearing without hours
Transfer resistance30%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Waterproof20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims waterproof wear; your product does not list it
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 1 of 3 compared40
Comfort40%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists a comfortable feel
Hydration20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims hydration; your product does not list it
Skin types40%—not comparableNormal, Combination, OilyNot listedNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 86/100Shade match 97/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Gucci Sun-Kissed Glow Powder Bronzer in 04, against Armani Beauty Luminous Silk Creamy Bronzing Powder in 120 sunbathed dune. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade120 sunbathed duneClosest overall alternative04How they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall96
Colour55%94#a2664e#a2624cVery close colourColour difference 1.7 (0 is identical)
Depth25%98Deep / darkMediumCloseDepth difference 1.4 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNeutralNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family20%100BronzeBronzeSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format25% of overall · 2 of 3 compared100
Finish50%100NaturalNaturalSameSame natural finish
Pigmentation25%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists an opacity
Format25%100PowderPowderSameBoth powder
Wear & performance15% of overall · 2 of 3 compared59
Longevity50%7024-hour wearLong-wearingSome differenceYour product claims 24-hour wear; the match says long-wearing without hours
Transfer resistance30%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims transfer resistance; your product does not list it
Overall match 91/100Shade match 96/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.