GEN NUDE Highlighting Blush Rose Glow dupes and alternatives bareMinerals
4.7 (634)·Rose · Cool · Light
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar blush overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 25%, wear and performance 15%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar blush on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar blush on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Same pigmentation: buildable· Both claim comfort
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Pink rather than rose· 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
69
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
72
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Pink rather than rose · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Retailer shade note: A nude pink with golden shimmer
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Same pigmentation: buildable· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone· Pink rather than rose· 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
66
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
59
Comfort & skin suitability
72
Close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone · Pink rather than rose · 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Same pigmentation: buildable· Same skin types: combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive
Differences: Lighter· Neutral rather than cool undertone· Pink rather than rose
Score details
Shade match
69
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
70
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Neutral rather than cool undertone · Pink rather than rose · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Retailer shade note: light pink with flecks of golden shimmer
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Mauve rather than rose· Natural rather than shimmer (finish)
Score details
Shade match
70
Finish, pigmentation & format
65
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Slight colour difference · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Mauve rather than rose · Natural rather than shimmer (finish) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Mauve rather than rose
Score details
Shade match
69
Finish, pigmentation & format
87
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
72
Slight colour difference · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Mauve rather than rose · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Normal, Combination, Sensitive rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Both claim comfort· Claims hydration
Differences: Pink rather than rose· Natural rather than shimmer (finish)· Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish, pigmentation & format
53
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Slight colour difference · Natural · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Pink rather than rose · Natural rather than shimmer (finish) · Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Pink rather than rose· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
67
Finish, pigmentation & format
87
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
72
Slight colour difference · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Pink rather than rose · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Normal, Combination, Sensitive rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable· Both claim comfort
Differences: Deeper· Mauve rather than rose· Matte rather than shimmer (finish)
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish, pigmentation & format
50
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Mauve rather than rose · Matte rather than shimmer (finish) · 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Same pigmentation: buildable· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Warm rather than cool undertone· Pink rather than rose
Score details
Shade match
51
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Warm rather than cool undertone · Pink rather than rose · 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Retailer shade note: peachy pink with golden shimmer
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable· Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Pink rather than rose
Score details
Shade match
56
Finish, pigmentation & format
65
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Visibly different colour · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Pink rather than rose · Natural rather than shimmer (finish) · Normal, Combination, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Pink rather than rose· Natural rather than shimmer (finish)
Score details
Shade match
65
Finish, pigmentation & format
47
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Natural
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Pink rather than rose · Natural rather than shimmer (finish) · Does not claim comfort · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Makeup By Mario Soft Pop Plumping Cream Blush Veil in Pinch Me Pink, against bareMinerals GEN NUDE Highlighting Blush in Rose Glow. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeRose GlowClosest shade matchPinch Me PinkHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall85
Colour55%85#eeb9c3#fdbcc6Very close colourColour difference 2.9 (0 is identical)
Depth15%94LightLightSameDepth difference 3.3 on the 0–100 scale
Comfort40%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable feel
Hydration20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims hydration; your product does not list it
Skin types40%60Combination, Dry, Normal, Oily, SensitiveNormal, Dry, CombinationSome differenceBoth marketed for combination, dry, normal skin
Overall match 75/100Shade match 85/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Natasha Denona Hy-Blush Cloudy Cream Cheek Duo in Sweet Cheeks, against bareMinerals GEN NUDE Highlighting Blush in Rose Glow. Matched on the lighter blush pan. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeRose GlowClosest overall alternativeSweet CheeksHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall85
Colour55%85#eeb9c3#f4c2c6Very close colourColour difference 3.0 (0 is identical)
Depth15%92LightLightSameDepth difference 4.0 on the 0–100 scale
Overall match 88/100Shade match 85/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.