ORIGINAL Talc-Free Pressed Powder Foundation Mineral SPF 15 Medium 10 dupes and alternatives bareMinerals
4.6 (919)·Light medium · Cool · pink undertone
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar foundation overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same cool undertone· Claims long-wearing· Both claim not settling into lines
Differences: Slightly lighter· Natural rather than matte finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish & visual result
70
Wear & performance
72
Skin suitability
60
Close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Natural rather than matte finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Not marketed for dry/sensitive skin · No SPF
Matches: Same matte finish· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Medium rather than buildable coverage· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
68
Finish & visual result
89
Wear & performance
66
Skin suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · No SPF
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same matte finish· Claims a skin-like finish
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Medium rather than buildable coverage· Does not claim not settling into lines
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish & visual result
88
Wear & performance
66
Skin suitability
20
Slight colour difference · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Medium rather than buildable coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for dry/normal/oily/sensitive skin · No SPF
Matches: Both claim a blurring effect· Claims long-wearing· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Natural rather than matte finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish & visual result
81
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
60
Slight colour difference · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Natural rather than matte finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for combination/oily skin · Contains drying alcohol · No SPF
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Neutral rather than cool undertone· Natural rather than matte finish
Score details
Shade match
68
Finish & visual result
70
Wear & performance
66
Skin suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Neutral rather than cool undertone · Natural rather than matte finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · No SPF
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Neutral rather than cool undertone· Natural rather than matte finish
Score details
Shade match
66
Finish & visual result
70
Wear & performance
66
Skin suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Neutral rather than cool undertone · Natural rather than matte finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · No SPF
Differences: Slightly deeper· Natural rather than matte finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish & visual result
70
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
80
Colour not compared · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Natural rather than matte finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for sensitive skin · Contains listed fragrance · No SPF
Matches: Both claim a blurring effect· Claims long-wearing· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Slightly lighter· Neutral rather than cool undertone
Score details
Shade match
65
Finish & visual result
81
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
60
Slight colour difference · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Slightly lighter · Neutral rather than cool undertone · Natural rather than matte finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for combination/oily skin · Contains drying alcohol · No SPF
Differences: Radiant rather than matte finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish & visual result
50
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
60
Close colour · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Radiant rather than matte finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for combination/sensitive skin · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: medium with cool rosy undertones
Matches: Claims a skin-like finish· Both claim a blurring effect· Both claim not settling into lines
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Slightly warmer undertone· Natural rather than matte finish
Score details
Shade match
56
Finish & visual result
73
Wear & performance
100
Skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Slightly warmer undertone · Natural rather than matte finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No SPF
Retailer shade note: Medium-tan with warm olive undertones
Matches: Same cool undertone· Claims a skin-like finish· Claims long-wearing
Differences: Slightly lighter· Radiant rather than matte finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish & visual result
48
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
60
Slight colour difference · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Radiant rather than matte finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for combination/normal skin · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: medium with cool pink undertones
Matches: Claims a skin-like finish· Claims long-wearing· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Neutral rather than cool undertone· Medium rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
66
Finish & visual result
68
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
60
Slight colour difference · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Neutral rather than cool undertone · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for normal/sensitive skin · No SPF
$18.99Ulta Beauty(product price)$20.51 less (52%)4.2 (18,317)
Natural · Medium coverage
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Natural rather than matte finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
65
Finish & visual result
70
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
80
Slight colour difference · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Natural rather than matte finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for sensitive skin · Contains listed fragrance · No SPF
Matches: Claims long-wearing· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Neutral rather than cool undertone· Natural rather than matte finish
Score details
Shade match
65
Finish & visual result
70
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
20
Slight colour difference · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Neutral rather than cool undertone · Natural rather than matte finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for combination/normal/oily/sensitive skin · Contains listed fragrance · No SPF
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same matte finish· Both claim not settling into lines
Differences: Described as light, yours as medium· Medium rather than buildable coverage· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
40
Finish & visual result
89
Wear & performance
100
Skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Described as light, yours as medium · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Not marketed for dry/normal/sensitive skin
The closest shade to bareMinerals ORIGINAL Talc-Free Pressed Powder Foundation Mineral SPF 15 Medium 10 (Light medium · Cool · pink undertone) in each concealer range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Concealer shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest match works
Haus Labs Triclone Skin Tech Medium Coverage Foundation in 240 Light Medium, against bareMinerals ORIGINAL Talc-Free Pressed Powder Foundation Mineral SPF 15 in Medium 10. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeMedium 10Closest match240 Light MediumHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall87
Colour60%82#e0b0a8#d0a8a0Close colourColour difference 3.4 (0 is identical)
Overall match 79/100Shade match 87/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.