Silky-Soft Powder Blush Starlaa dupes and alternatives Benefit Cosmetics
4.6 (5,486)·Brown / nude · Warm · Medium
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar blush overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 25%, wear and performance 15%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar blush on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar blush on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: satin· Same pigmentation: buildable
Differences: Coral rather than brown / nude· Cream rather than powder (format)· Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish, pigmentation & format
84
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Close colour · Satin · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Coral rather than brown / nude · Cream rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Yves Saint Laurent Make Me Blush Longwear Natural Glow Cream Blush in 90 Toffee Temptation, against Benefit Cosmetics Silky-Soft Powder Blush in Starlaa. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeStarlaaClosest match90 Toffee TemptationHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall84
Colour55%81#bb6450#b16c5aClose colourColour difference 3.5 (0 is identical)
Depth15%99MediumMediumSameDepth difference 0.9 on the 0–100 scale
Format25%35PowderCreamDifferentCream rather than powder
Wear & performance15% of overall40
Longevity50%40Not listedLong-wearingSome differenceThe match claims long wear; your product does not list it
Transfer resistance30%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims transfer resistance; the match does not list it
Waterproof20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims waterproof wear; the match does not list it
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 2 of 3 compared80
Comfort40%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable feel
Hydration20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims hydration; your product does not list it
Skin types40%—not comparableCombination, Dry, Normal, Oily, SensitiveNot listedNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 77/100Shade match 84/100High confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
SephoraCosts $12 more