The POREfessional Blurring & Smoothing Foundation 33N Marvelous dupes and alternatives Benefit Cosmetics
4.3 (5,585)·Deep tan · Olive · neutral olive undertone
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar foundation overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
$22Ulta Beauty(product price)$25 less (53%)3.5 (42)
Matches: Same natural finish
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone· Buildable rather than medium coverage· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish & visual result
89
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
84
Close colour · Natural · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone · Buildable rather than medium coverage · No blurring effect claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim a lightweight feel
Matches: Same medium coverage· Both claim a blurring effect· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone· Radiant rather than natural finish· Not marketed for combination/oily skin
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish & visual result
81
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
33
Close colour · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone · Radiant rather than natural finish · Not marketed for combination/oily skin · Contains listed fragrance
Matches: Very close colour· Same natural finish· Claims a skin-like finish
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone· Buildable rather than medium coverage· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
57
Skin suitability
28
Very close colour · Natural · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone · Buildable rather than medium coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Not marketed for combination/oily skin
Retailer shade note: Deep dark shade with neutral undertones
$22Ulta Beauty(product price)$25 less (53%)3.5 (42)
Matches: Same natural finish
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Buildable rather than medium coverage· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish & visual result
89
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
84
Close colour · Natural · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Buildable rather than medium coverage · No blurring effect claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim a lightweight feel
The closest shade to Benefit Cosmetics The POREfessional Blurring & Smoothing Foundation 33N Marvelous (Deep tan · Olive · neutral olive undertone) in each concealer range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Concealer shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest match works
Yepoda The Dewy Day in 6N, against Benefit Cosmetics The POREfessional Blurring & Smoothing Foundation in 33N Marvelous. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade33N MarvelousClosest match6NHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall89
Colour60%94#9a755a#987760Very close colourColour difference 1.7 (0 is identical)
Coverage30%100MediumBuildableCloseBuildable coverage rather than medium (buildable: one step of tolerance)
Skin-like finish20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims a skin-like finish; your product does not list it
Blurring15%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a blurring or smoothing effect; the match does not list it
Wear & performance15% of overall · 2 of 5 compared57
Longevity30%3524-hour wear12-hour wearDifferent12-hour wear claimed against 24-hour wear
Transfer resistance20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Settling20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists not settling into pores or fine lines
Colour stability15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists colour stability (no oxidation)
Comfort15%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable, lightweight feel
Skin suitability5% of overall28
Skin type100%28Normal, combination, oilyNormal, dry, sensitiveBoth marketed for normal skin
Overall match 78/100Shade match 89/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Sephora$2 less (4%)
Ulta Beauty
