Crystal Eyes Shimmer Eyeshadow Stick Moonstone dupes and alternatives Bobbi Brown
4.6 (195)·Golden · Light
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Differences: Nude rather than golden· Shimmer rather than glitter (finish)· Palette rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish, pigmentation & format
61
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Looks identical · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Nude rather than golden · Shimmer rather than glitter (finish) · Palette rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim hydration
e.l.f. Cosmetics Perfect 10 Eyeshadow Palette in Keep It Ethereal, against Bobbi Brown Crystal Eyes Shimmer Eyeshadow Stick in Moonstone. Matched on pan 1. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeMoonstoneClosest shade matchKeep It EtherealHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall96
Colour60%94#e7ccba#ebceb8Very close colourColour difference 1.6 (0 is identical)
Depth15%98LightLightSameDepth difference 1.1 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100GoldenGoldenSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall11
Finish65%0GlitterMatteDifferentMatte finish rather than glitter
Pigmentation20%30SheerOpaqueDifferentOpaque rather than sheer
Format15%35StickPaletteDifferentPowder rather than stick
Wear & performance10% of overall · 2 of 3 compared40
Longevity50%4012-hour wearNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims long wear; the match does not list it
Crease resistance30%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims crease resistance; the match does not list it
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 1 of 3 compared40
Comfort40%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists a comfortable feel
Hydration20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims hydration; the match does not list it
Skin types40%—not comparableNormal, Dry, CombinationNot listedNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 62/100Shade match 96/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Kaja Eye Bento Bouncy Eyeshadow Trio in Velvet Dream, against Bobbi Brown Crystal Eyes Shimmer Eyeshadow Stick in Moonstone. Matched on pan 1. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeMoonstoneClosest overall alternativeVelvet DreamHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall92
Colour60%87#e7ccba#e9c7b5Very close colourColour difference 2.7 (0 is identical)
Depth15%97LightLightSameDepth difference 1.7 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100GoldenGoldenSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall · 2 of 3 compared61
Finish65%68GlitterShimmerSome differenceShimmer finish rather than glitter
Pigmentation20%—not comparableSheerNot listedNot listed for eitherAn opacity not listed for one product
Format15%35StickPaletteDifferentPowder rather than stick
Wear & performance10% of overall · 2 of 3 compared40
Longevity50%4012-hour wearNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims long wear; the match does not list it
Crease resistance30%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims crease resistance; the match does not list it
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 1 of 3 compared40
Comfort40%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists a comfortable feel
Hydration20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims hydration; the match does not list it
Skin types40%—not comparableNormal, Dry, CombinationNot listedNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 75/100Shade match 92/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
31 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.