Airbrush Flawless Foundation 17 Neutral dupes and alternatives Charlotte Tilbury
4.3 (2,828)·Rich deep · Neutral undertone
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar foundation overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Same medium coverage· Both claim a skin-like finish
Differences: Radiant rather than matte finish· Does not claim transfer resistance· Does not claim colour stability
Score details
Shade match
91
Finish & visual result
69
Wear & performance
33
Skin suitability
60
Close colour · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Radiant rather than matte finish · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim colour stability · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin
Retailer shade note: deep with rich neutral undertones
Matches: Same matte finish· Same medium coverage· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone· No skin-like finish claimed· Does not claim transfer resistance
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish & visual result
88
Wear & performance
51
Skin suitability
60
Close colour · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim colour stability · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for dry/sensitive skin
Retailer shade note: very deep skin with a balance of warm & cool undertones
The closest shade to Charlotte Tilbury Airbrush Flawless Foundation 17 Neutral (Rich deep · Neutral undertone) in each concealer range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Concealer shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest shade match works
Hourglass Veil Hydrating Skin Tint Foundation in 18, against Charlotte Tilbury Airbrush Flawless Foundation in 17 Neutral. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade17 NeutralClosest shade match18How they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall93
Colour60%88#3a2012#381e08Very close colourColour difference 2.6 (0 is identical)
Overall match 74/100Shade match 93/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
ONE/SIZE Turn Up the Base Full Beat Waterproof Liquid Foundation in Deepest 65 N, against Charlotte Tilbury Airbrush Flawless Foundation in 17 Neutral. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade17 NeutralClosest overall alternativeDeepest 65 NHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall87
Colour60%78#3a2012#401e14Close colourColour difference 3.9 (0 is identical)
Coverage30%80MediumFullCloseFull coverage rather than medium (buildable: one step of tolerance)
Skin-like finish20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a skin-like finish; the match does not list it
Blurring15%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a blurring or smoothing effect
Wear & performance15% of overall · 4 of 5 compared63
Longevity30%7024-hour wearLong-wearingSome differenceYour product claims 24-hour wear; the match says long-wearing without hours
Transfer resistance20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims transfer resistance; the match does not list it
Settling20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists not settling into pores or fine lines
Colour stability15%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims colour stability (no oxidation); the match does not list it
Comfort15%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable, lightweight feel
Skin suitability5% of overall20
Skin type100%20Combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitiveSensitiveBoth marketed for sensitive skin
Overall match 79/100Shade match 87/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
31 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
SephoraCosts $6 more
