Airbrush Flawless Foundation 17 Neutral dupes and alternatives Charlotte Tilbury
4.3 (2,828)·Rich deep · Neutral undertone
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar foundation overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Same matte finish· Same medium coverage
Differences: No long-wear claim· Does not claim transfer resistance· Does not claim colour stability
Score details
Shade match
90
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
51
Skin suitability
20
Close colour · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: No long-wear claim · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for dry/normal/oily/sensitive skin
Matches: Very close colour· Same neutral undertone· Same medium coverage
Differences: Natural rather than matte finish· No skin-like finish claimed· Does not claim transfer resistance
Score details
Shade match
94
Finish & visual result
73
Wear & performance
63
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than matte finish · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for combination/oily skin
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Both claim a skin-like finish· Both claim transfer resistance
Differences: Natural matte rather than matte finish· Buildable rather than medium coverage· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish & visual result
83
Wear & performance
78
Skin suitability
50
Close colour · Natural matte · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural matte rather than matte finish · Buildable rather than medium coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim colour stability
Retailer shade note: deep shade with neutral-to-warm undertones
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Same matte finish· Same medium coverage
Differences: No long-wear claim· Does not claim transfer resistance· Does not claim colour stability
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
51
Skin suitability
20
Close colour · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: No long-wear claim · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for dry/normal/oily/sensitive skin
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Same matte finish· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Full rather than medium coverage· No skin-like finish claimed· Does not claim transfer resistance
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish & visual result
82
Wear & performance
63
Skin suitability
20
Close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Full rather than medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for combination/dry/normal/oily skin
Retailer shade note: very deep, neutral undertones
$17.99Ulta Beauty(product price)$34.01 less (65%)4.2 (5,328)
Matches: Very close colour· Same neutral undertone· Both claim a skin-like finish
Differences: Radiant rather than matte finish· Full rather than medium coverage· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
89
Finish & visual result
54
Wear & performance
74
Skin suitability
100
Very close colour · Radiant · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Radiant rather than matte finish · Full rather than medium coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim colour stability
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Same medium coverage· Both claim transfer resistance
Differences: Natural rather than matte finish· No skin-like finish claimed· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
90
Finish & visual result
64
Wear & performance
66
Skin suitability
60
Close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 18% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than matte finish · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim colour stability · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Same medium coverage· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Natural rather than matte finish· No skin-like finish claimed· Does not claim transfer resistance
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish & visual result
73
Wear & performance
63
Skin suitability
60
Close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than matte finish · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin
Retailer shade note: dark deep to rich - neutral, slightly warm
Matches: Very close colour· Same neutral undertone· Same medium coverage
Differences: Radiant rather than matte finish· No skin-like finish claimed· Does not claim transfer resistance
Score details
Shade match
94
Finish & visual result
57
Wear & performance
49
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Radiant rather than matte finish · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim colour stability · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for combination/oily skin
Matches: Same medium coverage· Both claim a skin-like finish· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Natural rather than matte finish· Does not claim transfer resistance
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish & visual result
85
Wear & performance
63
Skin suitability
60
Close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Natural rather than matte finish · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for dry/sensitive skin
Retailer shade note: dark deep with warm undertone
$24Ulta Beauty(product price)$28 less (54%)4.3 (6,617)
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Same matte finish· Claims not settling into lines
Differences: Full rather than medium coverage· No skin-like finish claimed· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish & visual result
73
Wear & performance
58
Skin suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Full rather than medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim colour stability
Retailer shade note: for the deepest darkest skin w/ neutral undertone
Differences: Natural rather than matte finish · Light rather than medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim colour stability
Matches: Same matte finish· Both claim a skin-like finish· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone· Full rather than medium coverage· No long-wear claim
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish & visual result
94
Wear & performance
51
Skin suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone · Full rather than medium coverage · No long-wear claim · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim colour stability
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Same medium coverage· Both claim a skin-like finish
Differences: Natural rather than matte finish· No long-wear claim· Does not claim transfer resistance
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish & visual result
85
Wear & performance
51
Skin suitability
60
Close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than matte finish · No long-wear claim · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for dry/sensitive skin
Matches: Very close colour· No drying alcohol listed· Adds SPF 50
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone· Natural rather than matte finish· Full rather than medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish & visual result
58
Wear & performance
51
Skin suitability
100
Very close colour · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone · Natural rather than matte finish · Full rather than medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim colour stability · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: deepest cool with red undertones
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Same medium coverage· Both claim a skin-like finish
Differences: Radiant rather than matte finish· Does not claim transfer resistance· Does not claim colour stability
Score details
Shade match
91
Finish & visual result
69
Wear & performance
33
Skin suitability
60
Close colour · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Radiant rather than matte finish · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim colour stability · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin
Retailer shade note: deep with rich neutral undertones
Matches: Same matte finish· Same medium coverage· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone· No skin-like finish claimed· Does not claim transfer resistance
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish & visual result
88
Wear & performance
51
Skin suitability
60
Close colour · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim colour stability · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for dry/sensitive skin
Retailer shade note: very deep skin with a balance of warm & cool undertones
Differences: Natural rather than matte finish · Light rather than medium coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for dry/oily skin
Matches: Very close colour· Same neutral undertone· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Radiant rather than matte finish· Light rather than medium coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
93
Finish & visual result
42
Wear & performance
63
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Radiant · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Radiant rather than matte finish · Light rather than medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin
The closest shade to Charlotte Tilbury Airbrush Flawless Foundation 17 Neutral (Rich deep · Neutral undertone) in each concealer range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Concealer shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest shade match works
Kylie Cosmetics Skin Tint Blurring Elixir Foundation in 10N, against Charlotte Tilbury Airbrush Flawless Foundation in 17 Neutral. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade17 NeutralClosest shade match10NHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall95
Colour60%92#3a2012#3e2618Very close colourColour difference 2.0 (0 is identical)
Overall match 81/100Shade match 95/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Ulta Beauty Collection Complexion Crush Foundation in Very Deep Cool, against Charlotte Tilbury Airbrush Flawless Foundation in 17 Neutral. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade17 NeutralClosest overall alternativeVery Deep CoolHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall86
Colour60%91#3a2012#3f2013Very close colourColour difference 2.2 (0 is identical)
Overall match 85/100Shade match 86/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
31 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.