Airbrush Flawless Foundation 5 Neutral dupes and alternatives Charlotte Tilbury
4.3 (2,828)·Light · Neutral undertone
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar foundation overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
$18.99Ulta Beauty(product price)$33.01 less (63%)4.1 (2,799)
Matches: Very close colour· Same matte finish· Both claim 24-hour wear
Differences: Full rather than medium coverage· No skin-like finish claimed· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish & visual result
73
Wear & performance
79
Skin suitability
100
Very close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Full rather than medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim colour stability · Contains listed fragrance
$18.99Ulta Beauty(product price)$33.01 less (63%)4.1 (2,799)
Matches: Very close colour· Same matte finish· Both claim 24-hour wear
Differences: Full rather than medium coverage· No skin-like finish claimed· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish & visual result
73
Wear & performance
79
Skin suitability
100
Very close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Full rather than medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim colour stability · Contains listed fragrance
Matches: Same matte finish· Same medium coverage· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Slightly lighter· No skin-like finish claimed· Does not claim transfer resistance
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish & visual result
88
Wear & performance
58
Skin suitability
100
Close colour · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim colour stability · Contains listed fragrance
$18.99Ulta Beauty(product price)$33.01 less (63%)4.4 (40,035)
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim transfer resistance· Both claim colour stability
Differences: Natural rather than matte finish· Full rather than medium coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish & visual result
58
Wear & performance
85
Skin suitability
100
Very close colour · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than matte finish · Full rather than medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Contains listed fragrance
Matches: Same matte finish· Both claim a blurring effect· No drying alcohol listed
Differences: Full rather than medium coverage· No skin-like finish claimed· Does not claim transfer resistance
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish & visual result
82
Wear & performance
51
Skin suitability
100
Colour not compared · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Full rather than medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim colour stability · Does not claim a lightweight feel
$39Ulta Beauty(product price)$13 less (25%)4.3 (1,754)
Matches: Same matte finish· Same medium coverage· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· No skin-like finish claimed· No long-wear claim
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish & visual result
88
Wear & performance
51
Skin suitability
60
Close colour · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · No skin-like finish claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for normal/sensitive skin
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Both claim a skin-like finish· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Natural rather than matte finish· Buildable rather than medium coverage· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish & visual result
76
Wear & performance
63
Skin suitability
80
Colour not compared · Natural · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than matte finish · Buildable rather than medium coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for sensitive skin
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Both claim a skin-like finish· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly deeper· Natural rather than matte finish· Buildable rather than medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish & visual result
76
Wear & performance
63
Skin suitability
80
Colour not compared · Natural · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Natural rather than matte finish · Buildable rather than medium coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for sensitive skin
Matches: Very close colour· Same medium coverage· Both claim transfer resistance
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Natural rather than matte finish· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish & visual result
64
Wear & performance
66
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 18% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Natural rather than matte finish · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim colour stability · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin
Matches: Same matte finish· Both claim a blurring effect· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly deeper· Slightly warmer undertone· Light rather than medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish & visual result
82
Wear & performance
51
Skin suitability
60
Close colour · Matte · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Slightly deeper · Slightly warmer undertone · Light rather than medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for dry/sensitive skin
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim a lightweight feel· No drying alcohol listed
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Natural rather than matte finish· Full rather than medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish & visual result
58
Wear & performance
51
Skin suitability
100
Very close colour · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Natural rather than matte finish · Full rather than medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim colour stability
Retailer shade note: warm nude with yellow undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Same medium coverage· Both claim a skin-like finish
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Natural rather than matte finish· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish & visual result
76
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Natural rather than matte finish · No blurring effect claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim colour stability · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin
Matches: Both claim a blurring effect· No drying alcohol listed
Differences: Olive rather than neutral undertone· Natural matte rather than matte finish· Full rather than medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish & visual result
74
Wear & performance
38
Skin suitability
100
Close colour · Natural matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Olive rather than neutral undertone · Natural matte rather than matte finish · Full rather than medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim colour stability · Does not claim a lightweight feel
Retailer shade note: medium neutral with olive undertones
Matches: Same matte finish· No drying alcohol listed
Differences: Slightly lighter· Full rather than medium coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish & visual result
73
Wear & performance
51
Skin suitability
60
Close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Full rather than medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim colour stability · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for dry/sensitive skin · Contains listed fragrance
$14Ulta Beauty(product price)$38 less (73%)4.1 (33)
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Both claim a skin-like finish· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly lighter· Radiant rather than matte finish· Light rather than medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish & visual result
54
Wear & performance
51
Skin suitability
100
Close colour · Radiant · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Radiant rather than matte finish · Light rather than medium coverage · No blurring effect claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim colour stability
$14Ulta Beauty(product price)$38 less (73%)4.1 (33)
Matches: Both claim a skin-like finish· Both claim a lightweight feel· No drying alcohol listed
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone· Radiant rather than matte finish· Light rather than medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish & visual result
54
Wear & performance
51
Skin suitability
100
Close colour · Radiant · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone · Radiant rather than matte finish · Light rather than medium coverage · No blurring effect claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim colour stability
Matches: Very close colour· No drying alcohol listed
Differences: Olive rather than neutral undertone· Radiant rather than matte finish· Light rather than medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish & visual result
42
Wear & performance
51
Skin suitability
100
Very close colour · Radiant · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Olive rather than neutral undertone · Radiant rather than matte finish · Light rather than medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim colour stability · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Contains listed fragrance
Matches: Both claim a lightweight feel· No drying alcohol listed
Differences: Slightly lighter· Olive rather than neutral undertone· Natural rather than matte finish
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish & visual result
58
Wear & performance
49
Skin suitability
60
Close colour · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Olive rather than neutral undertone · Natural rather than matte finish · Full rather than medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin
Matches: Same medium coverage· No drying alcohol listed
Differences: Slightly lighter· Natural rather than matte finish· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
70
Finish & visual result
64
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
80
Colour not compared · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Natural rather than matte finish · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim colour stability · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for sensitive skin · Contains listed fragrance
The closest shade to Charlotte Tilbury Airbrush Flawless Foundation 5 Neutral (Light · Neutral undertone) in each concealer range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Concealer shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest shade match works
CoverGirl Simply Ageless Skin Perfector Essence Foundation in Light-Neutral, against Charlotte Tilbury Airbrush Flawless Foundation in 5 Neutral. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade5 NeutralClosest shade matchLight-NeutralHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall94
Colour60%91#e5c495#edc79aVery close colourColour difference 2.1 (0 is identical)
Depth15%96LightFairCloseDepth difference: 2.3
Retailer descriptionMediumNot statedNo depth word in one descriptionNot compared
Overall match 80/100Shade match 94/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
TIRTIR Mask Fit Red Cushion in 28N OAT, against Charlotte Tilbury Airbrush Flawless Foundation in 5 Neutral. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade5 NeutralClosest overall alternative28N OATHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall91
Colour60%86#e5c495#dcc49aVery close colourColour difference 2.9 (0 is identical)
Depth15%98LightLightSameDepth difference: 1.0
Retailer descriptionMediumMediumBoth described as mediumThe retailers describe the same depth
Overall match 85/100Shade match 91/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.