Airbrush Powder Blush Blur Pillow Talk Medium dupes and alternatives Charlotte Tilbury
4.7 (847)·Pink · Cool · Medium
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar blush overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 25%, wear and performance 15%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar blush on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar blush on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Very close colour· Same cool undertone· Same finish: matte
Differences: Rose rather than pink· Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim transfer resistance
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
58
Very close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than pink · Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim transfer resistance
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish, pigmentation & format
80
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
69
Close colour · Natural · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: buildable
Differences: Stick rather than powder (format)· Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim transfer resistance
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish, pigmentation & format
84
Wear & performance
67
Comfort & skin suitability
69
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Stick rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Very close colour· Same cool undertone· Claims comfort
Differences: Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Stick rather than powder (format)· Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
90
Finish, pigmentation & format
64
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Natural · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Stick rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than normal, combination, oily (skin types)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Claims comfort· Both claim hydration
Differences: Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Stick rather than powder (format)· Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
90
Finish, pigmentation & format
64
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Close colour · Natural · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Stick rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than normal, combination, oily (skin types)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable· Same longevity: 16-hour wear
Differences: Shimmer rather than matte (finish)· Liquid rather than powder (format)· Does not claim waterproof
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish, pigmentation & format
43
Wear & performance
88
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Shimmer rather than matte (finish) · Liquid rather than powder (format) · Does not claim waterproof · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than normal, combination, oily (skin types)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same format: powder· Claims comfort
Differences: Dewy rather than matte (finish)· Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim transfer resistance
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish, pigmentation & format
63
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
70
Close colour · Dewy
Ingredients (not scored): 20% ingredient overlap
Differences: Dewy rather than matte (finish) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Retailer shade note: gold and cool pink, for pale skin tones
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable· Claims comfort
Differences: Rose rather than pink· Cream rather than powder (format)· Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish, pigmentation & format
73
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
64
Close colour · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than pink · Cream rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: buildable
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
69
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable· Claims comfort
Differences: Stick rather than powder (format)· Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim transfer resistance
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish, pigmentation & format
73
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
58
Slight colour difference · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Stick rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable· Same format: powder
Differences: Mauve rather than pink· Dewy rather than matte (finish)· Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish, pigmentation & format
73
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
76
Close colour · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Mauve rather than pink · Dewy rather than matte (finish) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same finish: matte· Both claim hydration
Differences: Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Cream rather than powder (format)· Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish, pigmentation & format
75
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Cream rather than powder (format) · Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Very close colour· Same pigmentation: buildable· Both claim transfer resistance
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Dewy rather than matte (finish)· Stick rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish, pigmentation & format
56
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 17% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Dewy rather than matte (finish) · Stick rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Very close colour· Same cool undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable
Differences: Mauve rather than pink· Dewy rather than matte (finish)· Liquid rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish, pigmentation & format
53
Wear & performance
60
Comfort & skin suitability
58
Very close colour · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Mauve rather than pink · Dewy rather than matte (finish) · Liquid rather than powder (format) · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: buildable· Both claim hydration
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Mauve rather than pink· Cream rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish, pigmentation & format
84
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Mauve rather than pink · Cream rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same finish: matte· Claims comfort
Differences: Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Liquid rather than powder (format)· Does not claim transfer resistance
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish, pigmentation & format
71
Wear & performance
60
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than powder (format) · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable· Same format: powder
Differences: Deeper· Rose rather than pink· Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish, pigmentation & format
89
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
58
Slight colour difference · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 39% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Rose rather than pink · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Cream rather than powder (format)· Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim transfer resistance
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish, pigmentation & format
64
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
53
Close colour · Natural
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cream rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim hydration · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than normal, combination, oily (skin types)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable· Both claim hydration
Differences: Rose rather than pink· Stick rather than powder (format)· Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish, pigmentation & format
73
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
89
Close colour · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than pink · Stick rather than powder (format) · Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Retailer shade note: natural rose / light to tan with cool undertones
Matches: Same cool undertone· Both claim waterproof· Claims comfort
Differences: Mauve rather than pink· Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Cream rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish, pigmentation & format
64
Wear & performance
52
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Natural · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Mauve rather than pink · Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Cream rather than powder (format) · Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable· Both claim hydration
Differences: Lighter· Stick rather than powder (format)· Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish, pigmentation & format
73
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
89
Slight colour difference · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Stick rather than powder (format) · Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Retailer shade note: happy pink with lilac undertones / medium with neutral universal undertones
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable· Claims comfort
Differences: Deeper· Satin rather than matte (finish)· Cream rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish, pigmentation & format
67
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Slight colour difference · Satin · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Satin rather than matte (finish) · Cream rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Cream rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish, pigmentation & format
64
Wear & performance
52
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Natural · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Cream rather than powder (format) · Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same format: powder· Claims comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Rose rather than pink· Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
70
Finish, pigmentation & format
80
Wear & performance
60
Comfort & skin suitability
72
Slight colour difference · Natural · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 20% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Rose rather than pink · Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable· Same format: powder
Differences: Lighter· Plum rather than pink· Dewy rather than matte (finish)
Score details
Shade match
67
Finish, pigmentation & format
73
Wear & performance
85
Comfort & skin suitability
58
Close colour · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 28% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Plum rather than pink · Dewy rather than matte (finish) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Yves Saint Laurent Make Me Blush 12H Blurring Liquid Blush in 80 Fig Fantasy, against Charlotte Tilbury Airbrush Powder Blush Blur in Pillow Talk Medium. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadePillow Talk MediumClosest shade match80 Fig FantasyHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall94
Colour55%90#d98797#d5848eVery close colourColour difference 2.3 (0 is identical)
Depth15%97MediumMediumSameDepth difference 2.0 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone15%100CoolCoolSameSame product undertone
Colour family15%100PinkPinkSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format25% of overall71
Finish50%100MatteMatteSameSame matte finish
Pigmentation25%65BuildableOpaqueSome differenceOpaque rather than buildable
Format25%20PowderLiquidDifferentLiquid rather than powder
Wear & performance15% of overall60
Longevity50%8016-hour wear12-hour wearClose12-hour wear claimed against 16-hour wear
Transfer resistance30%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims transfer resistance; the match does not list it
Waterproof20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims waterproof wear; the match does not list it
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 2 of 3 compared40
Comfort40%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims a comfortable feel; your product does not list it
Hydration20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims hydration; the match does not list it
Skin types40%—not comparableNormal, Combination, OilyNot listedNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 80/100Shade match 94/100High confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
NYX Professional Makeup Buttermelt Pressed Powder Blush in For The Butta, against Charlotte Tilbury Airbrush Powder Blush Blur in Pillow Talk Medium. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadePillow Talk MediumClosest overall alternativeFor The ButtaHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall83
Colour55%81#d98797#e67e97Close colourColour difference 3.5 (0 is identical)
Depth15%99MediumMediumSameDepth difference 0.4 on the 0–100 scale
Overall match 86/100Shade match 83/100High confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Ulta Beauty
Sephora$9 less (21%)
