Beautiful Skin Medium to Full Coverage Radiant Concealer 11.5 Tan dupes and alternatives Charlotte Tilbury
4.5 (515)·Light · Warm · golden undertone
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar concealer overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar concealer on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar concealer on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same warm undertone· Claims a blurring effect· Both claim 16-hour wear
Differences: Matte rather than radiant finish· Full rather than medium-full coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish & visual result
42
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than radiant finish · Full rather than medium-full coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for dry skin
Retailer shade note: medium to tan skin with warm, golden undertones
Matches: Claims not settling into lines· No fragrance listed
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone· Matte rather than radiant finish· Full rather than medium-full coverage
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish & visual result
43
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
80
Close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone · Matte rather than radiant finish · Full rather than medium-full coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Contains drying alcohol
Retailer shade note: for medium to tan skin w/ cool undertones
Matches: Claims a blurring effect· Claims transfer resistance· Claims not settling into lines
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Matte rather than radiant finish· Full rather than medium-full coverage
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish & visual result
42
Wear & performance
47
Skin suitability
87
Slight colour difference · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Matte rather than radiant finish · Full rather than medium-full coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel
Retailer shade note: Medium Tan with neutral undertones
Matches: Claims not settling into lines· No fragrance listed
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Full rather than medium-full coverage
Score details
Shade match
59
Finish & visual result
61
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
76
Slight colour difference · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Full rather than medium-full coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel
The closest shade to Charlotte Tilbury Beautiful Skin Medium to Full Coverage Radiant Concealer 11.5 Tan (Light · Warm · golden undertone) in each foundation range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Foundation shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest match works
Fenty Beauty Pro Filt'r Instant Retouch Longwear Liquid Concealer in 300, against Charlotte Tilbury Beautiful Skin Medium to Full Coverage Radiant Concealer in 11.5 Tan. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade11.5 TanClosest match300How they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall79
Colour60%69#f9b27a#f9c198Slight colour differenceColour difference 5.1 (0 is identical)
Depth15%86LightFairCloseDepth difference: 5.8
Retailer descriptionTanMedium tanSome differenceRetailer descriptions one depth band apart
Finish & visual result25% of overall · 3 of 4 compared43
Finish35%12RadiantMatteDifferentMatte finish rather than radiant
Coverage30%80Medium-fullFullCloseFull coverage rather than medium-full
Skin-like finish20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a skin-like finish; the match does not list it
Blurring15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists a blurring or smoothing effect
Wear & performance15% of overall · 3 of 5 compared54
Longevity30%7016-hour wearLong-wearingSome differenceYour product claims 16-hour wear; the match says long-wearing without hours
Transfer resistance20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Settling20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims not settling into pores or fine lines; your product does not list it
Colour stability15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists colour stability (no oxidation)
Comfort15%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a comfortable, lightweight feel; the match does not list it
Skin suitability5% of overall80
Skin type100%80Dry, normalNormal, dry, combination, oilyBoth marketed for dry/normal skin
Overall match 66/100Shade match 79/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Sephora$4 less (11%)
