Beautiful Skin Medium to Full Coverage Radiant Concealer 15 Deep dupes and alternatives Charlotte Tilbury
4.5 (515)·Deep · Neutral undertone
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar concealer overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar concealer on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar concealer on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Same radiant finish· Both claim a skin-like finish
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Slightly lighter· Medium rather than medium-full coverage
Score details
Shade match
70
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
87
Slight colour difference · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Slightly lighter · Medium rather than medium-full coverage · No long-wear claim · Does not claim a lightweight feel
The closest shade to Charlotte Tilbury Beautiful Skin Medium to Full Coverage Radiant Concealer 15 Deep (Deep · Neutral undertone) in each foundation range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Foundation shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest shade match works
Laura Mercier Real Flawless Weightless Perfecting Serum Concealer in 6C1, against Charlotte Tilbury Beautiful Skin Medium to Full Coverage Radiant Concealer in 15 Deep. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade15 DeepClosest shade match6C1How they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall88
Colour60%95#975233#934e2fLooks identicalColour difference 1.4 (0 is identical)
Depth15%96DeepDeepSameDepth difference: 2.2
Retailer descriptionDeepDeepBoth described as deepThe retailers describe the same depth
Overall match 79/100Shade match 88/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Rare Beauty Liquid Touch Brightening Concealer in 530N, against Charlotte Tilbury Beautiful Skin Medium to Full Coverage Radiant Concealer in 15 Deep. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade15 DeepClosest overall alternative530NHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall86
Colour60%77#975233#8d5838Close colourColour difference 4.0 (0 is identical)
Depth15%100DeepDeepSameDepth difference: 0.2
Retailer descriptionDeepDeepBoth described as deepThe retailers describe the same depth
Finish & visual result25% of overall · 3 of 4 compared100
Finish35%100RadiantRadiantSameSame radiant finish
Coverage30%100Medium-fullMediumCloseMedium coverage rather than medium-full (buildable: one step of tolerance)
Skin-like finish20%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a skin-like finish
Blurring15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists a blurring or smoothing effect
Wear & performance15% of overall · 3 of 5 compared68
Longevity30%7016-hour wearLong-wearingSome differenceYour product claims 16-hour wear; the match says long-wearing without hours
Transfer resistance20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Settling20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims not settling into pores or fine lines; your product does not list it
Colour stability15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists colour stability (no oxidation)
Comfort15%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable, lightweight feel
Skin suitability5% of overall80
Skin type100%80Dry, normalOily, dry, combination, normalBoth marketed for dry/normal skin
Overall match 87/100Shade match 86/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Sephora$12 less (33%)
