Beautiful Skin Medium to Full Coverage Radiant Concealer 4 Fair dupes and alternatives Charlotte Tilbury
4.5 (515)·Fair · Neutral undertone
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar concealer overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar concealer on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar concealer on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Very close colour· Same neutral undertone· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish· Full rather than medium-full coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
92
Finish & visual result
68
Wear & performance
49
Skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish · Full rather than medium-full coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for dry skin
Retailer shade note: fair skin with neutral undertones
$8Ulta Beauty(product price)$28 less (78%)4.3 (8,153)
Matches: Claims not settling into lines· Both claim a lightweight feel· No fragrance listed
Differences: Slightly deeper· Slightly warmer undertone· Satin rather than radiant finish
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish & visual result
70
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
87
Close colour · Satin · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Slightly warmer undertone · Satin rather than radiant finish · Full rather than medium-full coverage · No skin-like finish claimed
Retailer shade note: light with golden beige undertones
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Full rather than medium-full coverage
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish & visual result
68
Wear & performance
49
Skin suitability
50
Looks identical · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Full rather than medium-full coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for dry skin
Retailer shade note: light skin with warm peach undertones
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Slightly deeper· Natural rather than radiant finish· Full rather than medium-full coverage
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish & visual result
68
Wear & performance
49
Skin suitability
50
Close colour · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Natural rather than radiant finish · Full rather than medium-full coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for dry skin
Retailer shade note: very fair skin with neutral undertones
The closest shade to Charlotte Tilbury Beautiful Skin Medium to Full Coverage Radiant Concealer 4 Fair (Fair · Neutral undertone) in each foundation range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Foundation shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest shade match works
Huda Beauty #FauxFilter Matte Buildable Coverage Waterproof Concealer in Coconut Flakes 2.7 Neutral, against Charlotte Tilbury Beautiful Skin Medium to Full Coverage Radiant Concealer in 4 Fair. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade4 FairClosest shade matchCoconut Flakes 2.7 NeutralHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall92
Colour60%90#f5caa2#eac19aVery close colourColour difference 2.3 (0 is identical)
Depth15%89FairLightCloseDepth difference: 4.9
Retailer descriptionFairLightSome differenceRetailer descriptions one depth band apart
Finish35%12RadiantMatteDifferentMatte finish rather than radiant
Coverage30%100Medium-fullFullCloseFull coverage rather than medium-full (buildable: one step of tolerance)
Skin-like finish20%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a skin-like finish
Blurring15%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims a blurring or smoothing effect; your product does not list it
Wear & performance15% of overall · 4 of 5 compared51
Longevity30%7016-hour wearLong-wearingSome differenceYour product claims 16-hour wear; the match says long-wearing without hours
Transfer resistance20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims transfer resistance; your product does not list it
Settling20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims not settling into pores or fine lines; your product does not list it
Colour stability15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists colour stability (no oxidation)
Comfort15%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a comfortable, lightweight feel; the match does not list it
Skin suitability5% of overall87
Skin type100%87Dry, normalNormal, dry, oilyBoth marketed for dry/normal skin
Overall match 78/100Shade match 92/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Hourglass Vanish Airbrush Full Coverage Longwear Concealer in Bisque 1.8, against Charlotte Tilbury Beautiful Skin Medium to Full Coverage Radiant Concealer in 4 Fair. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade4 FairClosest overall alternativeBisque 1.8How they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall91
Colour60%85#f5caa2#edc9abClose colourColour difference 3.0 (0 is identical)
Depth15%98FairFairSameDepth difference: 1.2
Retailer descriptionFairFairBoth described as fairThe retailers describe the same depth
Transfer resistance20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Settling20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims not settling into pores or fine lines; your product does not list it
Colour stability15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists colour stability (no oxidation)
Comfort15%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable, lightweight feel
Skin suitability5% of overall87
Skin type100%87Dry, normalNormal, dry, combinationBoth marketed for dry/normal skin
Overall match 84/100Shade match 91/100High confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
SephoraCosts $3 more
