Beautiful Skin Medium Coverage Foundation 11 Warm dupes and alternatives Charlotte Tilbury
3.6 (1,497)·Medium tan · Warm undertone
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar foundation overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim 12-hour wear· Claims not settling into lines
Differences: Olive rather than warm undertone· Radiant rather than natural finish· Light rather than medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish & visual result
62
Wear & performance
66
Skin suitability
84
Very close colour · Radiant · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Olive rather than warm undertone · Radiant rather than natural finish · Light rather than medium coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Contains listed fragrance
Matches: Very close colour· Same medium coverage· Both claim 16-hour wear
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Radiant rather than natural finish· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish & visual result
70
Wear & performance
100
Skin suitability
0
Very close colour · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Radiant rather than natural finish · No blurring effect claimed · Not marketed for normal/dry/combination skin
Matches: Both claim a blurring effect· Both claim 12-hour wear
Differences: Slightly lighter· Neutral rather than warm undertone· Natural matte rather than natural finish
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish & visual result
83
Wear & performance
67
Skin suitability
84
Close colour · Natural matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 23% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Neutral rather than warm undertone · Natural matte rather than natural finish · Full rather than medium coverage · Does not claim a lightweight feel
Matches: Both claim a blurring effect· Both claim 12-hour wear
Differences: Slightly deeper· Neutral rather than warm undertone· Natural matte rather than natural finish
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish & visual result
83
Wear & performance
67
Skin suitability
84
Close colour · Natural matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 23% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Neutral rather than warm undertone · Natural matte rather than natural finish · Full rather than medium coverage · Does not claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Matte rather than natural finish· Full rather than medium coverage· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish & visual result
62
Wear & performance
60
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than natural finish · Full rather than medium coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for dry skin · Contains listed fragrance
Matches: Same medium coverage· Both claim 16-hour wear· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Olive rather than warm undertone· Radiant rather than natural finish· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish & visual result
70
Wear & performance
100
Skin suitability
0
Close colour · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Olive rather than warm undertone · Radiant rather than natural finish · No blurring effect claimed · Not marketed for normal/dry/combination skin
$20.99Ulta Beauty(product price)$31.01 less (60%)4.3 (8,122)
Matches: Same warm undertone
Differences: Radiant rather than natural finish· Light rather than medium coverage· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish & visual result
62
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
84
Close colour · Radiant · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Radiant rather than natural finish · Light rather than medium coverage · No blurring effect claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Contains drying alcohol
$9Ulta Beauty(product price)$43 less (83%)4.3 (644)
Matte · Full coverage
Differences: Matte rather than natural finish· Full rather than medium coverage· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish & visual result
62
Wear & performance
60
Skin suitability
60
Close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than natural finish · Full rather than medium coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for dry skin · Contains listed fragrance
Differences: Slightly lighter· Olive rather than warm undertone· Radiant rather than natural finish
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish & visual result
62
Wear & performance
60
Skin suitability
84
Close colour · Radiant · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 17% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Olive rather than warm undertone · Radiant rather than natural finish · Light rather than medium coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: very intense dark, olive undertone
$9Ulta Beauty(product price)$43 less (83%)4.3 (644)
Matte · Full coverage
Differences: Matte rather than natural finish· Full rather than medium coverage· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish & visual result
62
Wear & performance
60
Skin suitability
60
Close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than natural finish · Full rather than medium coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for dry skin · Contains listed fragrance
The closest shade to Charlotte Tilbury Beautiful Skin Medium Coverage Foundation 11 Warm (Medium tan · Warm undertone) in each concealer range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Concealer shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest shade match works
L'Oréal Paris Age Perfect Radiant Serum Foundation in 85 Perfect Beige, against Charlotte Tilbury Beautiful Skin Medium Coverage Foundation in 11 Warm. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade11 WarmClosest shade match85 Perfect BeigeHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall93
Colour60%89#bd9059#c28f5cVery close colourColour difference 2.4 (0 is identical)
Finish & visual result25% of overall · 3 of 4 compared89
Finish35%100NaturalNaturalSameSame natural finish
Coverage30%100MediumMediumSameSame medium coverage
Skin-like finish20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists a skin-like finish
Blurring15%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a blurring or smoothing effect; the match does not list it
Wear & performance15% of overall · 3 of 5 compared54
Longevity30%4016-hour wearNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims long wear; the match does not list it
Transfer resistance20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Settling20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims not settling into pores or fine lines; your product does not list it
Colour stability15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists colour stability (no oxidation)
Comfort15%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable, lightweight feel
Skin suitability5% of overall0
Skin type100%0Normal, dry, combinationSensitiveMarketed for different skin types
Overall match 82/100Shade match 93/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Smashbox Dual Filter 2-In-1 Longwearing Concealer + Foundation in Tan 25 Olive, against Charlotte Tilbury Beautiful Skin Medium Coverage Foundation in 11 Warm. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade11 WarmClosest overall alternativeTan 25 OliveHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall83
Colour60%87#bd9059#bc8d5fVery close colourColour difference 2.8 (0 is identical)
Overall match 84/100Shade match 83/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Walmart
Ulta Beauty$39.41 less (76%)
Sephora
