Eyes To Mesmerise Cream Eyeshadow Walk Of No Shame dupes and alternatives Charlotte Tilbury
4.5 (2,590)·Rose · Medium
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Differences: Nude rather than rose· Shimmer rather than glitter (finish)· Liquid rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish, pigmentation & format
66
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Nude rather than rose · Shimmer rather than glitter (finish) · Liquid rather than cream (format) · 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance
$26Ulta Beauty(product price)$10 less (28%)4.8 (590)
Matches: Same finish: glitter· Both claim crease resistance· Claims comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Pink rather than rose· Powder rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
54
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
81
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Glitter
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Pink rather than rose · Powder rather than cream (format) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Pink rather than rose· Shimmer rather than glitter (finish)
Score details
Shade match
65
Finish, pigmentation & format
74
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Pink rather than rose · Shimmer rather than glitter (finish) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance
$15Ulta Beauty(product price)$21 less (58%)4.0 (271)
Metallic · Opaque
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Powder rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
62
Finish, pigmentation & format
74
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Powder rather than cream (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Bronze rather than rose· 11-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
49
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Bronze rather than rose · 11-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance
$10.50Ulta Beauty(product price)$25.50 less (71%)4.2 (1,248)
Matches: Same format: cream· Both claim crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Pink rather than rose
Score details
Shade match
54
Finish, pigmentation & format
74
Wear & performance
58
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Pink rather than rose · Shimmer rather than glitter (finish) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Mauve rather than rose
Score details
Shade match
53
Finish, pigmentation & format
78
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Mauve rather than rose · Liquid rather than cream (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Bronze rather than rose· 11-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
46
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Bronze rather than rose · 11-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance
$26Ulta Beauty(product price)$10 less (28%)4.7 (1,256)
Matches: Same finish: glitter· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Plum rather than rose
Score details
Shade match
38
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
81
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Glitter · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Plum rather than rose · Powder rather than cream (format) · 8-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Copper rather than rose· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
A reliable match cannot be determined for this pair (low data confidence), so no score is shown.
Slight colour difference · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Copper rather than rose · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance
Matches: Both claim crease resistance· Claims waterproof· Claims comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Golden rather than rose· Liquid rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
44
Finish, pigmentation & format
78
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Golden rather than rose · Liquid rather than cream (format) · 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Golden rather than rose· Shimmer rather than glitter (finish)
Score details
Shade match
51
Finish, pigmentation & format
74
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Golden rather than rose · Shimmer rather than glitter (finish) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Golden rather than rose· 11-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
43
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Golden rather than rose · 11-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance
Matches: Both claim crease resistance· Claims waterproof· Claims comfort
Differences: Mauve rather than rose· Matte rather than glitter (finish)· Liquid rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish, pigmentation & format
11
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Mauve rather than rose · Matte rather than glitter (finish) · Liquid rather than cream (format) · 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Natasha Denona LUXE GLAM COMPACT Quad Eyeshadow Palette in Rosy, against Charlotte Tilbury Eyes To Mesmerise Cream Eyeshadow in Walk Of No Shame. Matched on the Mesa pan. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeWalk Of No ShameClosest shade matchRosyHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall79
Colour60%66#c06250#af6d61Slight colour differenceColour difference 5.5 (0 is identical)
Depth15%99MediumMediumSameDepth difference 0.6 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedWarmUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100RoseRoseSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall · 2 of 3 compared61
Finish65%68GlitterShimmerSome differenceShimmer finish rather than glitter
Pigmentation20%—not comparableNot listedOpaqueNot listed for eitherAn opacity not listed for one product
Format15%35CreamPowderDifferentPowder rather than cream
Wear & performance10% of overall · 2 of 3 compared40
Longevity50%40Long-wearingNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims long wear; the match does not list it
Crease resistance30%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims crease resistance; the match does not list it
Overall match 69/100Shade match 79/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Sacheu Long Wear Liquid Eyeshadow STAY-N in Shu-ggah, against Charlotte Tilbury Eyes To Mesmerise Cream Eyeshadow in Walk Of No Shame. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeWalk Of No ShameClosest overall alternativeShu-ggahHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall75
Colour60%63#c06250#c47468Slight colour differenceColour difference 5.9 (0 is identical)
Depth15%81MediumMediumSome differenceDepth difference 7.0 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedWarmUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100RoseRoseSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall · 2 of 3 compared66
Finish65%68GlitterShimmerSome differenceShimmer finish rather than glitter
Pigmentation20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists an opacity
Format15%60CreamLiquidSome differenceLiquid rather than cream
Wear & performance10% of overall · 2 of 3 compared100
Longevity50%100Long-wearingLong-wearingSameBoth products claim long wear
Overall match 74/100Shade match 75/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
32 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Ulta Beauty(product price)$10 less (28%)
