tint & PROTECT medium coverage serum foundation 11 | Rich dupes and alternatives Ciele
4.2 (1,343)·Very deep · Neutral · neutral pink undertone
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar foundation overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Very close colour· Same neutral undertone· Claims not settling into lines
Differences: Radiant rather than natural finish· Light rather than medium coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
91
Finish & visual result
58
Wear & performance
66
Skin suitability
84
Very close colour · Radiant · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Radiant rather than natural finish · Light rather than medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Contains listed fragrance · No SPF
Matches: Very close colour· Same neutral undertone· Same natural finish
Differences: Slightly deeper· Full rather than medium coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish & visual result
73
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
84
Very close colour · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Full rather than medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Contains listed fragrance
Matches: Very close colour· Similar undertone (cool vs neutral)· Claims 24-hour wear
Differences: Matte rather than natural finish· Full rather than medium coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
90
Finish & visual result
58
Wear & performance
49
Skin suitability
67
Very close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than natural finish · Full rather than medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Not marketed for combination skin
Retailer shade note: very deep with brick red undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Similar undertone (cool vs neutral)· Claims 24-hour wear
Differences: Matte rather than natural finish· Full rather than medium coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish & visual result
58
Wear & performance
49
Skin suitability
67
Very close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than natural finish · Full rather than medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Not marketed for combination skin
Retailer shade note: very deep with true red undertones
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Matte rather than natural finish· Full rather than medium coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish & visual result
67
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
67
Close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than natural finish · Full rather than medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for normal skin
Matches: Very close colour· Similar undertone (cool vs neutral)· Claims 8-hour wear
Differences: Slightly deeper· Radiant rather than natural finish· Light rather than medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish & visual result
58
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
67
Very close colour · Radiant · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Radiant rather than natural finish · Light rather than medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for oily skin
Retailer shade note: very deep with cool, subtle red undertones
Matches: Similar undertone (cool vs neutral)· Claims 24-hour wear· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Matte rather than natural finish· Full rather than medium coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish & visual result
58
Wear & performance
49
Skin suitability
67
Close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than natural finish · Full rather than medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Not marketed for combination skin
Retailer shade note: rich deep with soft red undertones
Matches: Similar undertone (cool vs neutral)· Claims 24-hour wear· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Matte rather than natural finish· Full rather than medium coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish & visual result
58
Wear & performance
49
Skin suitability
67
Close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than natural finish · Full rather than medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Not marketed for combination skin
Retailer shade note: very deep with red undertones
Differences: Radiant rather than natural finish· Full rather than medium coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish & visual result
58
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
90
Close colour · Radiant · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Radiant rather than natural finish · Full rather than medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Contains listed fragrance · No SPF
Matches: Same natural finish· Same medium coverage· Claims long-wearing
Differences: Slightly deeper· Slightly warmer undertone· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
60
Close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Slightly warmer undertone · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for oily skin · No SPF
The closest shade to Ciele tint & PROTECT medium coverage serum foundation 11 | Rich (Very deep · Neutral · neutral pink undertone) in each concealer range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Concealer shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest shade match works
Ulta Beauty Collection Moisturizing Complexion Stick in Deep Cool, against Ciele tint & PROTECT medium coverage serum foundation in 11 | Rich. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade11 | RichClosest shade matchDeep CoolHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall93
Colour60%96#7e3b1e#7e3f22Looks identicalColour difference 1.2 (0 is identical)
Overall match 84/100Shade match 93/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Ulta Beauty Collection Complexion Crush Foundation in Dark Cool, against Ciele tint & PROTECT medium coverage serum foundation in 11 | Rich. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade11 | RichClosest overall alternativeDark CoolHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall92
Colour60%94#7e3b1e#7a3717Very close colourColour difference 1.6 (0 is identical)
Overall match 91/100Shade match 92/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.