Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar lip gloss overall: shade match 50%, finish and visual result 25%, wear and performance 15%, comfort and suitability 10%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar lip gloss on shade, finish, wear and comfort together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar lip gloss on shade, finish, wear and comfort together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Differences: Pearl rather than shimmer (shimmer)· Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)· Does not claim non-sticky
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish & visual result
90
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Pearl rather than shimmer (shimmer) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim non-sticky · Does not claim hydration
Dior Addict Lip Glow Balm in 075 Gummy Warm Undertone, against Clarins Lip Perfector Peptide-Plumping Lip Gloss in 05 Candy Shimmer. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
Overall match 81/100Shade match 93/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Huda Beauty Faux Filler Shiny Non-Sticky Lip Gloss in Sugar Baby, against Clarins Lip Perfector Peptide-Plumping Lip Gloss in 05 Candy Shimmer. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade05 Candy ShimmerClosest overall alternativeSugar BabyHow they compareScore
Shade match50% of overall91
Colour55%84#f06b72#eb797dClose colourColour difference 3.1 (0 is identical)
Depth15%95LightLightSameDepth difference 3.1 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone15%100WarmWarmSameSame product undertone
Colour family15%100PinkPinkSameSame colour family
Finish & visual result25% of overall · 1 of 3 compared78
Shine40%78ShimmerHigh shineCloseMore shine
Transparency35%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists a transparency
Shimmer25%—not comparableShimmerNot listedNot listed for eitherShimmer not listed for one product
Wear & performance15% of overall · none of 1 comparable50
Longevity100%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists long wear
Comfort & suitability10% of overall100
Non-sticky50%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a non-sticky feel
Overall match 82/100Shade match 91/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.