Cheek Pop Powder Blush Pink Pop dupes and alternatives Clinique
4.6 (767)·Pink · Cool · Light
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar blush overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 25%, wear and performance 15%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar blush on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar blush on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Very close colour· Same finish: natural· Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Cream rather than powder (format)· Normal, Dry, Combination rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish, pigmentation & format
78
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Natural
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Cream rather than powder (format) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same finish: natural· Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Rose rather than pink· Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)· Cream rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish, pigmentation & format
75
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than pink · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Cream rather than powder (format) · Normal, Combination, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same format: powder· Claims waterproof
Differences: Lighter· Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)· 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish, pigmentation & format
80
Wear & performance
61
Comfort & skin suitability
53
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same format: powder· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)· 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)· Normal, Combination, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish, pigmentation & format
80
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
53
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Normal, Combination, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same longevity: long-wearing· Claims hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)· Cream rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish, pigmentation & format
64
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
53
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Cream rather than powder (format) · Normal, Combination, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same format: powder· Claims comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)· 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish, pigmentation & format
80
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same longevity: long-wearing· Claims comfort
Differences: Mauve rather than pink· Dewy rather than natural (finish)· Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish, pigmentation & format
59
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
64
Close colour · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Mauve rather than pink · Dewy rather than natural (finish) · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Cream rather than powder (format)
Matches: Same finish: natural· Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Neutral rather than cool undertone
Score details
Shade match
67
Finish, pigmentation & format
78
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Slight colour difference · Natural
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Neutral rather than cool undertone · Cream rather than powder (format) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same longevity: long-wearing· Claims transfer resistance· Claims comfort
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Dewy rather than natural (finish)· Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish, pigmentation & format
59
Wear & performance
78
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Dewy rather than natural (finish) · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Stick rather than powder (format)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same longevity: long-wearing· Claims comfort
Differences: Mauve rather than pink· Dewy rather than natural (finish)· Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish, pigmentation & format
55
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Mauve rather than pink · Dewy rather than natural (finish) · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than powder (format) · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Very close colour· Claims comfort· Claims hydration
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Dewy rather than natural (finish)· Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
89
Finish, pigmentation & format
55
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
48
Very close colour · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Dewy rather than natural (finish) · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than powder (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Normal, Combination, Sensitive rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Huda Beauty Blush Filter Soft Glow Liquid Blush in Bubblegum, against Clinique Cheek Pop Powder Blush in Pink Pop. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadePink PopClosest shade matchBubblegumHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall96
Colour55%94#ee8ca0#f08fa7Very close colourColour difference 1.6 (0 is identical)
Depth15%98LightLightSameDepth difference 1.5 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone15%100CoolCoolSameSame product undertone
Colour family15%100PinkPinkSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format25% of overall55
Finish50%67NaturalDewySome differenceDewy finish rather than natural
Pigmentation25%65SheerBuildableSome differenceBuildable rather than sheer
Format25%20PowderLiquidDifferentLiquid rather than powder
Wear & performance15% of overall · 1 of 3 compared100
Longevity50%100Long-wearingLong-wearingSameBoth products claim long wear
Transfer resistance30%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Overall match 84/100Shade match 96/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Comfort40%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims a comfortable feel; your product does not list it
Hydration20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims hydration; your product does not list it
Skin types40%60Combination, Dry, Normal, Oily, SensitiveNormal, Dry, CombinationSome differenceBoth marketed for combination, dry, normal skin
Overall match 91/100Shade match 95/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
31 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.