Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar concealer overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar concealer on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar concealer on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Same medium coverage· Claims a skin-like finish
Differences: Radiant rather than natural finish· No blurring effect claimed· No long-wear claim
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish & visual result
64
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
60
Close colour · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Radiant rather than natural finish · No blurring effect claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for oily skin
Retailer shade note: medium with neutral undertones
Matches: Same medium coverage· Both claim a blurring effect· Claims not settling into lines
Differences: Slightly lighter· Slightly warmer undertone· Matte rather than natural finish
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish & visual result
81
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
60
Close colour · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Slightly warmer undertone · Matte rather than natural finish · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for dry skin
Retailer shade note: M1.5 - Medium with warm undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Same medium coverage· Claims a skin-like finish
Differences: Slightly deeper· Olive rather than neutral undertone· Radiant rather than natural finish
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish & visual result
64
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Olive rather than neutral undertone · Radiant rather than natural finish · No blurring effect claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for oily skin
Retailer shade note: medium tan with olive undertones
Matches: Same medium coverage· Claims a skin-like finish
Differences: Slightly deeper· Olive rather than neutral undertone· Radiant rather than natural finish
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish & visual result
64
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
60
Close colour · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Olive rather than neutral undertone · Radiant rather than natural finish · No blurring effect claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for oily skin
Retailer shade note: medium with subtle olive undertones
Matches: Same medium coverage· Claims a skin-like finish
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Radiant rather than natural finish· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish & visual result
64
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
60
Close colour · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Radiant rather than natural finish · No blurring effect claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for oily skin
Retailer shade note: medium with golden undertones
The closest shade to Clinique Even Better All-Over Concealer + Eraser CN 52 Neutral (Light · Neutral · neutral pink undertone) in each foundation range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Foundation shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest shade match works
Kosas Revealer Super Creamy + Brightening Concealer in Tone 5.8, against Clinique Even Better All-Over Concealer + Eraser in CN 52 Neutral. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeCN 52 NeutralClosest shade matchTone 5.8How they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall86
Colour60%86#e3bd96#d9b28dVery close colourColour difference 2.9 (0 is identical)
Finish35%56NaturalRadiantSome differenceRadiant finish rather than natural
Coverage30%100MediumMediumSameSame medium coverage
Skin-like finish20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims a skin-like finish; your product does not list it
Blurring15%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a blurring or smoothing effect; the match does not list it
Wear & performance15% of overall · 2 of 5 compared40
Longevity30%40Long-wearingNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims long wear; the match does not list it
Transfer resistance20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Settling20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists not settling into pores or fine lines
Colour stability15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists colour stability (no oxidation)
Comfort15%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a comfortable, lightweight feel; the match does not list it
Skin suitability5% of overall60
Skin type100%60Normal, dry, oilyNormal, dry, combinationBoth marketed for normal/dry skin
Overall match 72/100Shade match 86/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Rare Beauty Liquid Touch Brightening Concealer in 270N, against Clinique Even Better All-Over Concealer + Eraser in CN 52 Neutral. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeCN 52 NeutralClosest overall alternative270NHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall84
Colour60%80#e3bd96#ebb88fClose colourColour difference 3.7 (0 is identical)
Depth15%99LightLightSameDepth difference: 0.8
Retailer descriptionMediumMediumBoth described as mediumThe retailers describe the same depth
Overall match 79/100Shade match 84/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
SephoraCosts $14 more
View at Target
