Even Better All-Over Concealer + Eraser CN 90 Sand dupes and alternatives Clinique
4.0 (1,308)·Light medium · Neutral · neutral pink undertone
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar concealer overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar concealer on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar concealer on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Very close colour· Similar undertone (cool vs neutral)· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Matte rather than natural finish· Full rather than medium coverage· Does not claim a lightweight feel
Score details
Shade match
89
Finish & visual result
66
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than natural finish · Full rather than medium coverage · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for dry skin · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: medium skin with a balance of warm & cool undertones
$8Ulta Beauty(product price)$14 less (64%)4.3 (8,153)
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Both claim long-wearing· Claims not settling into lines
Differences: Slightly lighter· Satin rather than natural finish· Full rather than medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish & visual result
64
Wear & performance
82
Skin suitability
60
Close colour · Satin · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Satin rather than natural finish · Full rather than medium coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Not marketed for oily skin
Retailer shade note: medium light with neutral undertones
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Both claim a blurring effect· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Matte rather than natural finish· Full rather than medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish & visual result
66
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
60
Looks identical · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Matte rather than natural finish · Full rather than medium coverage · Not marketed for dry skin · Contains drying alcohol
Retailer shade note: for medium skin with golden undertones
Matches: Same natural finish· Both claim long-wearing· Claims not settling into lines
Differences: Slightly lighter· Slightly warmer undertone· Full rather than medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish & visual result
74
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
84
Close colour · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Slightly warmer undertone · Full rather than medium coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel
Matches: Same natural finish· Both claim long-wearing· Claims not settling into lines
Differences: Slightly deeper· Slightly warmer undertone· Full rather than medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish & visual result
74
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
84
Close colour · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Slightly warmer undertone · Full rather than medium coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel
Matches: Same natural finish· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Full rather than medium coverage· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish & visual result
81
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
33
Close colour · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Full rather than medium coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for dry/oily skin · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: medium skin with warm yellow undertones
The closest shade to Clinique Even Better All-Over Concealer + Eraser CN 90 Sand (Light medium · Neutral · neutral pink undertone) in each foundation range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Foundation shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest shade match works
IT Cosmetics Bye Bye Under Eye Full Coverage Anti-Aging Water-Resistant Concealer in 21.5 Medium Nude, against Clinique Even Better All-Over Concealer + Eraser in CN 90 Sand. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeCN 90 SandClosest shade match21.5 Medium NudeHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall92
Colour60%93#d9b087#d7b28fVery close colourColour difference 1.8 (0 is identical)
Overall match 83/100Shade match 92/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Estée Lauder Double Wear Stay-in-Place 24-Hour Concealer in 3N, against Clinique Even Better All-Over Concealer + Eraser in CN 90 Sand. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeCN 90 SandClosest overall alternative3NHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall91
Colour60%93#d9b087#e0b58eVery close colourColour difference 1.8 (0 is identical)
Finish & visual result25% of overall · 3 of 4 compared93
Finish35%100NaturalNaturalSameSame natural finish
Coverage30%80MediumFullCloseFull coverage rather than medium (buildable: one step of tolerance)
Skin-like finish20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists a skin-like finish
Blurring15%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a blurring or smoothing effect
Wear & performance15% of overall · 3 of 5 compared68
Longevity30%70Long-wearing24-hour wearSome differenceThe match claims 24-hour wear; your product says long-wearing without hours
Transfer resistance20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims transfer resistance; your product does not list it
Settling20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists not settling into pores or fine lines
Colour stability15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists colour stability (no oxidation)
Comfort15%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable, lightweight feel
Skin suitability5% of overall100
Skin type100%100Normal, dry, oilyNormal, dry, oilyBoth marketed for normal/dry/oily skin
Overall match 89/100Shade match 91/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
SephoraCosts $16 more
View at Target
