Even Better Makeup Broad Spectrum SPF 15 Foundation WN 01 Flax dupes and alternatives Clinique
4.3 (6,833)·Very fair · Neutral · neutral golden undertone
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar foundation overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Very close colour· Same neutral undertone· Same natural finish
Differences: No blurring effect claimed· Does not claim colour stability· Not marketed for normal/combination skin
Score details
Shade match
91
Finish & visual result
89
Wear & performance
70
Skin suitability
33
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 16% ingredient overlap
Differences: No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for normal/combination skin · Contains listed fragrance · No SPF
Matches: Very close colour· Similar undertone (warm vs neutral)· Same natural finish
Differences: No blurring effect claimed· Does not claim colour stability· Not marketed for normal/combination skin
Score details
Shade match
90
Finish & visual result
89
Wear & performance
70
Skin suitability
33
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 16% ingredient overlap
Differences: No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for normal/combination skin · Contains listed fragrance · No SPF
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Same natural finish· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Buildable rather than medium coverage· Does not claim colour stability· Not marketed for combination skin
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
60
Skin suitability
60
Close colour · Natural · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Buildable rather than medium coverage · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for combination skin · Contains listed fragrance · No SPF
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Same natural finish· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Buildable rather than medium coverage· Does not claim colour stability· Not marketed for combination skin
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
60
Skin suitability
60
Close colour · Natural · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Buildable rather than medium coverage · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for combination skin · Contains listed fragrance · No SPF
Retailer shade note: very light skin with neutral undertones
Matches: Both claim a blurring effect· Both claim long-wearing· Claims a lightweight feel
Differences: Matte rather than natural finish· Buildable rather than medium coverage· Does not claim colour stability
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish & visual result
81
Wear & performance
70
Skin suitability
84
Close colour · Matte · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than natural finish · Buildable rather than medium coverage · Does not claim colour stability · Contains drying alcohol · No SPF
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Same natural finish· Same medium coverage
Differences: No blurring effect claimed· Does not claim colour stability· Not marketed for normal/combination skin
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish & visual result
89
Wear & performance
70
Skin suitability
33
Close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 16% ingredient overlap
Differences: No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for normal/combination skin · Contains listed fragrance · No SPF
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Same medium coverage· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Radiant rather than natural finish· Does not claim colour stability· Not marketed for combination skin
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish & visual result
81
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
60
Close colour · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Radiant rather than natural finish · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for combination skin · Contains drying alcohol · No SPF
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Same natural finish· Claims a skin-like finish
Differences: Buildable rather than medium coverage· No blurring effect claimed· Does not claim colour stability
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
55
Skin suitability
60
Close colour · Natural · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Buildable rather than medium coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for combination skin · No SPF
Retailer shade note: Fair shade with neutral undertones
Matches: Similar undertone (warm vs neutral)· Same natural finish· Same medium coverage
Differences: No blurring effect claimed· Does not claim colour stability· Not marketed for normal/combination skin
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish & visual result
89
Wear & performance
70
Skin suitability
33
Close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 16% ingredient overlap
Differences: No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for normal/combination skin · Contains listed fragrance · No SPF
Matches: Very close colour· Similar undertone (warm vs neutral)· Same medium coverage
Differences: Radiant rather than natural finish· No blurring effect claimed· Does not claim colour stability
Score details
Shade match
90
Finish & visual result
64
Wear & performance
70
Skin suitability
28
Very close colour · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Radiant rather than natural finish · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for normal/combination skin · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: very fair complexion with warm yellow undertone
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Same medium coverage· Claims a skin-like finish
Differences: Radiant rather than natural finish· No blurring effect claimed· Does not claim colour stability
Score details
Shade match
90
Finish & visual result
64
Wear & performance
70
Skin suitability
28
Close colour · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Radiant rather than natural finish · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for normal/combination skin · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: very fair complexion with neutral peach undertone
$25Ulta Beauty(product price)$14 less (36%)4.3 (340)
Matches: Very close colour· Same neutral undertone· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Matte rather than natural finish· Full rather than medium coverage· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
91
Finish & visual result
55
Wear & performance
49
Skin suitability
84
Very close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than natural finish · Full rather than medium coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim colour stability · Contains listed fragrance · No SPF
Retailer shade note: fair light with neutral undertone
The closest shade to Clinique Even Better Makeup Broad Spectrum SPF 15 Foundation WN 01 Flax (Very fair · Neutral · neutral golden undertone) in each concealer range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Concealer shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest shade match works
Clinique Beyond Perfecting Foundation + Concealer in WN 01 Flax, against Clinique Even Better Makeup Broad Spectrum SPF 15 Foundation in WN 01 Flax. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeWN 01 FlaxClosest shade matchWN 01 FlaxHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall95
Colour60%91#f9ecdd#f7e8d4Very close colourColour difference 2.1 (0 is identical)
Finish & visual result25% of overall · 3 of 4 compared74
Finish35%100NaturalNaturalSameSame natural finish
Coverage30%60MediumFullSome differenceFull coverage rather than medium
Skin-like finish20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists a skin-like finish
Blurring15%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a blurring or smoothing effect; the match does not list it
Wear & performance15% of overall · 3 of 5 compared70
Longevity30%70Long-wearing24-hour wearSome differenceThe match claims 24-hour wear; your product says long-wearing without hours
Transfer resistance20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Settling20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists not settling into pores or fine lines
Colour stability15%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim colour stability (no oxidation)
Comfort15%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims a comfortable, lightweight feel; your product does not list it
Skin suitability5% of overall60
Skin type100%60Normal, dry, combinationNormal, dry, oilyBoth marketed for normal/dry skin
Overall match 84/100Shade match 95/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Givenchy Prisme Libre Glow Serum Blurring Foundation in 0N, against Clinique Even Better Makeup Broad Spectrum SPF 15 Foundation in WN 01 Flax. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeWN 01 FlaxClosest overall alternative0NHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall91
Colour60%92#f9ecdd#feecdbVery close colourColour difference 2.0 (0 is identical)
Finish & visual result25% of overall · 3 of 4 compared100
Finish35%100NaturalNaturalSameSame natural finish
Coverage30%100MediumMediumSameSame medium coverage
Skin-like finish20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists a skin-like finish
Blurring15%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a blurring or smoothing effect
Wear & performance15% of overall · 3 of 5 compared55
Longevity30%70Long-wearing24-hour wearSome differenceThe match claims 24-hour wear; your product says long-wearing without hours
Transfer resistance20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Settling20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists not settling into pores or fine lines
Colour stability15%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims colour stability (no oxidation); the match does not list it
Comfort15%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims a comfortable, lightweight feel; your product does not list it
Skin suitability5% of overall100
Skin type100%100Normal, dry, combinationNormal, dry, combinationBoth marketed for normal/dry/combination skin
Overall match 89/100Shade match 91/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
31 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
SephoraCosts $24 more
Walmart
