Shadow Stix Cocktail Party dupes and alternatives ColourPop
4.8 (620)·Taupe · Medium
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Very close colour· Same finish: matte· Claims crease resistance
Differences: Brown rather than taupe· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Liquid rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish, pigmentation & format
87
Wear & performance
59
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown rather than taupe · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than cream (format) · 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: opaque
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Brown rather than taupe· Palette rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
65
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Brown rather than taupe · Palette rather than cream (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Retailer shade note: light-to-dark range of neutral mattes
Matches: Same finish: matte· Claims crease resistance· Claims comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Brown rather than taupe· Powder rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
63
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
59
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Brown rather than taupe · Powder rather than cream (format) · 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same format: cream· Claims comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Brown rather than taupe· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
A reliable match cannot be determined for this pair (low data confidence), so no score is shown.
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Brown rather than taupe · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Brown rather than taupe· Satin rather than matte (finish)
Score details
Shade match
66
Finish, pigmentation & format
77
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Satin
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Brown rather than taupe · Satin rather than matte (finish) · 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: opaque· Claims crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Nude rather than taupe· Powder rather than cream (format)
Score details
A reliable match cannot be determined for this pair (low data confidence), so no score is shown.
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Nude rather than taupe · Powder rather than cream (format) · 14-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same longevity: long-wearing· Claims crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Nude rather than taupe
Score details
Shade match
53
Finish, pigmentation & format
87
Wear & performance
78
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Nude rather than taupe · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than cream (format)
florence by mills Eye Candy Eyeshadow Stick in Toffee, against ColourPop Shadow Stix in Cocktail Party. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeCocktail PartyClosest matchToffeeHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall88
Colour60%98#a67152#a77154Looks identicalColour difference 0.8 (0 is identical)
Depth15%100MediumMediumSameDepth difference 0.2 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedWarmUndertone unknown on one side
Overall match 86/100Shade match 88/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
32 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.