Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar bronzer overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 25%, wear and performance 15%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar bronzer on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar bronzer on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable
Differences: Golden rather than bronze· Natural rather than dewy (finish)· Stick rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
89
Finish, pigmentation & format
67
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
84
Very close colour · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Golden rather than bronze · Natural rather than dewy (finish) · Stick rather than powder (format) · Dry, Combination, Oily rather than oily, combination, dry, normal, sensitive (skin types)
Retailer shade note: warm golden undertone, natural finish for medium skin tones
Matches: Very close colour· Same finish: dewy· Same format: powder
Differences: Golden rather than bronze· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)· Sensitive rather than oily, combination, dry, normal, sensitive (skin types)
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
68
Very close colour · Dewy
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Golden rather than bronze · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Sensitive rather than oily, combination, dry, normal, sensitive (skin types)
Retailer shade note: medium neutral bronze / medium marble glow
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Golden rather than bronze· Matte rather than dewy (finish)· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
90
Finish, pigmentation & format
48
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Very close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Golden rather than bronze · Matte rather than dewy (finish) · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Stick rather than powder (format)
Retailer shade note: light to medium with neutral, slightly golden undertones
Matches: Same longevity: long-wearing· Both claim comfort
Differences: Natural rather than dewy (finish)· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Liquid rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish, pigmentation & format
55
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
88
Close colour · Natural · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than dewy (finish) · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than powder (format) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same format: powder· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Golden rather than bronze· Natural rather than dewy (finish)· Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
91
Finish, pigmentation & format
75
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
64
Looks identical · Natural · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 19% ingredient overlap
Differences: Golden rather than bronze · Natural rather than dewy (finish) · Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same pigmentation: buildable· Same longevity: long-wearing· Both claim comfort
Differences: Deeper· Natural rather than dewy (finish)· Cream rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish, pigmentation & format
67
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
84
Close colour · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Natural rather than dewy (finish) · Cream rather than powder (format) · Dry, Combination, Oily rather than oily, combination, dry, normal, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Very close colour· Same pigmentation: buildable· Same format: powder
Differences: Matte rather than dewy (finish)· 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)· Does not claim hydration
Score details
Shade match
92
Finish, pigmentation & format
73
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
56
Very close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 16% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than dewy (finish) · 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim hydration · Oily rather than oily, combination, dry, normal, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same format: powder· Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Matte rather than dewy (finish)· Does not claim comfort· Normal, Combination, Oily rather than oily, combination, dry, normal, sensitive (skin types)
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish, pigmentation & format
63
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Close colour · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 19% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than dewy (finish) · Does not claim comfort · Normal, Combination, Oily rather than oily, combination, dry, normal, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Same finish: dewy
Differences: Golden rather than bronze· Liquid rather than powder (format)· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
91
Finish, pigmentation & format
80
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Golden rather than bronze · Liquid rather than powder (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than oily, combination, dry, normal, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Same format: powder
Differences: Rose rather than bronze· Matte rather than dewy (finish)· 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish, pigmentation & format
63
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
84
Very close colour · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than bronze · Matte rather than dewy (finish) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than oily, combination, dry, normal, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same pigmentation: buildable· Same format: powder
Differences: Golden rather than bronze· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)· Does not claim comfort
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
48
Close colour · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Golden rather than bronze · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration · Normal, Combination, Oily rather than oily, combination, dry, normal, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable· Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Matte rather than dewy (finish)· Stick rather than powder (format)· Normal, Dry, Combination rather than oily, combination, dry, normal, sensitive (skin types)
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish, pigmentation & format
56
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
84
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than dewy (finish) · Stick rather than powder (format) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than oily, combination, dry, normal, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Very close colour· Same longevity: long-wearing· Claims waterproof
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Golden rather than bronze· Natural rather than dewy (finish)
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish, pigmentation & format
59
Wear & performance
83
Comfort & skin suitability
88
Very close colour · Natural · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Golden rather than bronze · Natural rather than dewy (finish) · Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Cream rather than powder (format) · Does not claim hydration
Retailer shade note: rich caramel with neutral undertones
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same longevity: long-wearing· Both claim comfort
Differences: Golden rather than bronze· Matte rather than dewy (finish)· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish, pigmentation & format
48
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Golden rather than bronze · Matte rather than dewy (finish) · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Stick rather than powder (format)
Retailer shade note: medium to tan with warm, slightly neutral undertones
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same format: powder· Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Lighter· Matte rather than dewy (finish)· Does not claim comfort
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish, pigmentation & format
63
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Close colour · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 19% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Matte rather than dewy (finish) · Does not claim comfort · Normal, Combination, Oily rather than oily, combination, dry, normal, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same pigmentation: buildable· Same longevity: long-wearing· Both claim comfort
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Natural rather than dewy (finish)· Stick rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish, pigmentation & format
67
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
84
Close colour · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Natural rather than dewy (finish) · Stick rather than powder (format) · Dry, Combination, Oily rather than oily, combination, dry, normal, sensitive (skin types)
Retailer shade note: neutral/olive undertone, natural finish for tan skin tones
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable· Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Matte rather than dewy (finish)· Stick rather than powder (format)· Normal, Dry, Combination rather than oily, combination, dry, normal, sensitive (skin types)
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish, pigmentation & format
56
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
84
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than dewy (finish) · Stick rather than powder (format) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than oily, combination, dry, normal, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim comfort· Both claim hydration
Differences: Natural rather than dewy (finish)· Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Stick rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
92
Finish, pigmentation & format
59
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
84
Very close colour · Natural · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than dewy (finish) · Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Stick rather than powder (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than oily, combination, dry, normal, sensitive (skin types)
Dior Forever Skin Contour Stick in 02 Tan, against CoverGirl TruBlend Skin Enhancer Baked Luminous Bronzer in Toasted Butterscotch. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeToasted ButterscotchClosest shade match02 TanHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall96
Colour55%92#ad6e4f#b36b4aVery close colourColour difference 1.9 (0 is identical)
Depth25%100LightLightSameDepth difference 0.0 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableWarmNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family20%100BronzeBronzeSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format25% of overall59
Finish50%67DewyNaturalSome differenceNatural finish rather than dewy
Pigmentation25%65BuildableSheerSome differenceSheer rather than buildable
Format25%35PowderStickDifferentStick rather than powder
Wear & performance15% of overall · 2 of 3 compared61
Longevity50%70Long-wearing24-hour wearSome differenceThe match claims 24-hour wear; your product says long-wearing without hours
Transfer resistance30%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Waterproof20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims waterproof wear; your product does not list it
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 2 of 3 compared60
Comfort40%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a comfortable feel; the match does not list it
Skin types40%—not comparableOily, Combination, Dry, Normal, SensitiveNot listedNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 80/100Shade match 96/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
rhode Pocket Bronze Long-Wearing Cream Bronzer in bake, against CoverGirl TruBlend Skin Enhancer Baked Luminous Bronzer in Toasted Butterscotch. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeToasted ButterscotchClosest overall alternativebakeHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall90
Colour55%87#ad6e4f#a76b53Very close colourColour difference 2.7 (0 is identical)
Depth25%97LightMediumCloseDepth difference 2.0 on the 0–100 scale
Skin types40%60Oily, Combination, Dry, Normal, SensitiveNormal, Dry, CombinationSome differenceBoth marketed for combination, dry, normal skin
Overall match 86/100Shade match 90/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
32 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
SephoraCosts $31.01 more
