GlowTour Duo Shimmering Blush + Contour Stick Cosmic Currant dupes and alternatives DIBS Beauty
4.8 (1,468)·Berry · Cool · Deep / dark
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar blush overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 25%, wear and performance 15%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar blush on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar blush on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same finish: dewy· Claims waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
32
Slight colour difference · Dewy · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Normal rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same finish: dewy· Same pigmentation: buildable
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Liquid rather than stick (format)· Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
67
Finish, pigmentation & format
86
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Liquid rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Natural rather than dewy (finish)· Liquid rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish, pigmentation & format
70
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Natural rather than dewy (finish) · Liquid rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same finish: dewy· Same pigmentation: buildable
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Liquid rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
64
Finish, pigmentation & format
86
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Liquid rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same finish: dewy· Same format: stick· Claims comfort
Differences: Lighter· Warm rather than cool undertone· Red rather than berry
Score details
Shade match
62
Finish, pigmentation & format
91
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Dewy · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 16% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Warm rather than cool undertone · Red rather than berry · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · 24-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Matches: Same pigmentation: buildable· Same format: stick· Claims comfort
Differences: Lighter· Warm rather than cool undertone· Rose rather than berry
Score details
Shade match
51
Finish, pigmentation & format
84
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
70
Slight colour difference · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Warm rather than cool undertone · Rose rather than berry · Natural rather than dewy (finish) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Neutral rather than cool undertone· Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
65
Finish, pigmentation & format
55
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Neutral rather than cool undertone · Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Clinique Daily Calm Lip + Cheek Color in Soft Berry, against DIBS Beauty GlowTour Duo Shimmering Blush + Contour Stick in Cosmic Currant. Compared using pan 1 of your shade. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeCosmic CurrantClosest shade matchSoft BerryHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall79
Colour55%62#9c0e25#8c2a37Slight colour differenceColour difference 6.0 (0 is identical)
Depth15%100Deep / darkDeep / darkSameDepth difference 0.0 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone15%100CoolCoolSameSame product undertone
Colour family15%100BerryBerrySameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format25% of overall · 1 of 3 compared67
Finish50%67DewyNaturalSome differenceNatural finish rather than dewy
Pigmentation25%—not comparableBuildableNot listedNot listed for eitherAn opacity not listed for one product
Format25%—not comparableStickNot listedNot listed for eitherFormat not listed for one product
Wear & performance15% of overall · none of 3 comparable50
Longevity50%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists long wear
Transfer resistance30%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 1 of 3 compared40
Comfort40%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists a comfortable feel
Hydration20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims hydration; your product does not list it
Skin types40%—not comparableCombination, Dry, Normal, Oily, SensitiveNot listedNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 70/100Shade match 79/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Charlotte Tilbury Unreal Lip + Cheek Glow Blush Stick in Berry Glow, against DIBS Beauty GlowTour Duo Shimmering Blush + Contour Stick in Cosmic Currant. Compared using pan 1 of your shade. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeCosmic CurrantClosest overall alternativeBerry GlowHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall74
Colour55%54#9c0e25#842634Slight colour differenceColour difference 6.9 (0 is identical)
Depth15%94Deep / darkDeep / darkSameDepth difference 3.2 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone15%100CoolCoolSameSame product undertone
Colour family15%100BerryBerrySameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format25% of overall91
Finish50%100DewyDewySameSame dewy finish
Pigmentation25%65BuildableOpaqueSome differenceOpaque rather than buildable
Format25%100StickStickSameBoth stick
Wear & performance15% of overall · 1 of 3 compared40
Longevity50%40Not listed24-hour wearSome differenceThe match claims long wear; your product does not list it
Transfer resistance30%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 2 of 3 compared40
Comfort40%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims a comfortable feel; your product does not list it
Hydration20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims hydration; your product does not list it
Skin types40%—not comparableCombination, Dry, Normal, Oily, SensitiveNot listedNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 72/100Shade match 74/100High confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.