Forever Nude Bronze 40 Deep Matte dupes and alternatives Dior
4.8 (928)·Bronze · Deep / dark
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar bronzer overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 25%, wear and performance 15%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar bronzer on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar bronzer on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Differences: Dewy rather than matte (finish)· Cream rather than powder (format)· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
A reliable match cannot be determined for this pair (low data confidence), so no score is shown.
Very close colour · Dewy
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Dewy rather than matte (finish) · Cream rather than powder (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim hydration
Retailer shade note: warms medium dark to dark skin tones
Anastasia Beverly Hills Matte Contour and Sculpt Cream Bronzer in Amber, against Dior Forever Nude Bronze in 40 Deep Matte. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade40 Deep MatteClosest shade matchAmberHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall98
Colour55%96#9f6149#a25f45Looks identicalColour difference 1.2 (0 is identical)
Depth25%100Deep / darkLightCloseDepth difference 0.2 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedNeutralUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family20%100BronzeBronzeSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format25% of overall · 2 of 3 compared78
Finish50%100MatteMatteSameSame matte finish
Pigmentation25%—not comparableNot listedOpaqueNot listed for eitherAn opacity not listed for one product
Format25%35PowderCreamDifferentCream rather than powder
Wear & performance15% of overall40
Longevity50%40Long-wearingNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims long wear; the match does not list it
Transfer resistance30%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims transfer resistance; your product does not list it
Waterproof20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims waterproof wear; the match does not list it
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 2 of 3 compared40
Comfort40%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims a comfortable feel; your product does not list it
Hydration20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims hydration; the match does not list it
Skin types40%—not comparableNot listedCombination, Dry, Normal, Oily, SensitiveNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 81/100Shade match 98/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Charlotte Tilbury Airbrush Matte Bronzer in Refill Tan, against Dior Forever Nude Bronze in 40 Deep Matte. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade40 Deep MatteClosest overall alternativeRefill TanHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall88
Colour55%81#9f6149#9d6a54Close colourColour difference 3.5 (0 is identical)
Depth25%95Deep / darkDeep / darkSameDepth difference 3.0 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedWarmUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family20%100BronzeBronzeSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format25% of overall · 2 of 3 compared100
Finish50%100MatteMatteSameSame matte finish
Pigmentation25%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists an opacity
Format25%100PowderPowderSameBoth powder
Wear & performance15% of overall · 2 of 3 compared83
Longevity50%100Long-wearingLong-wearingSameBoth products claim long wear
Transfer resistance30%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Waterproof20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims waterproof wear; the match does not list it
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 1 of 3 compared100
Comfort40%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists a comfortable feel
Skin types40%—not comparableNot listedNormal, Combination, OilyNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 91/100Shade match 88/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
31 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.