Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar concealer overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar concealer on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar concealer on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Claims not settling into lines· Claims a lightweight feel· No fragrance listed
Differences: Slightly deeper· Neutral rather than warm undertone· Radiant rather than natural finish
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish & visual result
67
Wear & performance
51
Skin suitability
50
Close colour · Radiant · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Neutral rather than warm undertone · Radiant rather than natural finish · Buildable rather than full coverage · Does not claim transfer resistance
Matches: Claims a skin-like finish· Claims a blurring effect· Claims a lightweight feel
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Radiant rather than natural finish· Medium rather than full coverage
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish & visual result
58
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
50
Close colour · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Radiant rather than natural finish · Medium rather than full coverage · Does not claim transfer resistance
$31Ulta Beauty(product price)$11 less (26%)4.3 (1,273)
Matches: Claims not settling into lines· Claims a lightweight feel· No fragrance listed
Differences: Slightly lighter· Neutral rather than warm undertone· Luminous rather than natural finish
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish & visual result
55
Wear & performance
51
Skin suitability
50
Close colour · Luminous · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Neutral rather than warm undertone · Luminous rather than natural finish · Buildable rather than full coverage · Does not claim transfer resistance
Retailer shade note: for light neutral skin with peach undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Claims not settling into lines· Claims a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly lighter· Slightly cooler undertone· Radiant rather than natural finish
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish & visual result
67
Wear & performance
51
Skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Radiant · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Slightly cooler undertone · Radiant rather than natural finish · Buildable rather than full coverage · Does not claim transfer resistance
The closest shade to Dior Forever Skin Correct Full-Coverage Concealer 3W Warm (Medium light · Warm · yellow undertone) in each foundation range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Foundation shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest match works
IT Cosmetics Bye Bye Under Eye Full Coverage Anti-Aging Water-Resistant Concealer in 23.5 Medium Amber, against Dior Forever Skin Correct Full-Coverage Concealer in 3W Warm. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade3W WarmClosest match23.5 Medium AmberHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall95
Colour60%93#d5a97e#d6a476Very close colourColour difference 1.9 (0 is identical)
Finish & visual result25% of overall · 2 of 4 compared100
Finish35%100NaturalNaturalSameSame natural finish
Coverage30%100FullFullSameSame full coverage
Skin-like finish20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists a skin-like finish
Blurring15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists a blurring or smoothing effect
Wear & performance15% of overall · 3 of 5 compared53
Longevity30%7024-hour wearLong-wearingSome differenceYour product claims 24-hour wear; the match says long-wearing without hours
Transfer resistance20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims transfer resistance; the match does not list it
Settling20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims not settling into pores or fine lines; your product does not list it
Colour stability15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists colour stability (no oxidation)
Comfort15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists a comfortable, lightweight feel
Skin suitability5% of overall68
Skin type100%68NormalNormal, dry, combination, oily, sensitiveBoth marketed for normal skin
Overall match 89/100Shade match 95/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Sephora$12 less (29%)
