Peptide Bounce Flexible Foundation Deep/Rich dupes and alternatives Doll 10
4.1 (17)·Medium · Neutral undertone
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar foundation overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
$13.99Ulta Beauty(product price)$30.01 less (68%)4.3 (33,167)
Matches: Very close colour· Same natural finish· Same medium coverage
Differences: Slightly lighter· Slightly cooler undertone· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish & visual result
91
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 21% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Slightly cooler undertone · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim a lightweight feel
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Claims 24-hour wear· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Matte rather than natural finish· Full rather than medium coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
90
Finish & visual result
52
Wear & performance
65
Skin suitability
50
Close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than natural finish · Full rather than medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Contains listed fragrance
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Matte rather than natural finish· Full rather than medium coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish & visual result
67
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
50
Close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than natural finish · Full rather than medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim a lightweight feel
Matches: Very close colour· Same medium coverage· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone· Matte rather than natural finish· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish & visual result
64
Wear & performance
66
Skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone · Matte rather than natural finish · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines
Matches: Both claim a skin-like finish· Claims long-wearing· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Slightly deeper· Slightly cooler undertone· Matte rather than natural finish
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish & visual result
70
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
50
Close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Slightly cooler undertone · Matte rather than natural finish · Full rather than medium coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel
Retailer shade note: brown skin w/ pink undertones
Matches: Same medium coverage· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly deeper· Slightly warmer undertone· Matte rather than natural finish
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish & visual result
64
Wear & performance
66
Skin suitability
50
Close colour · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Slightly warmer undertone · Matte rather than natural finish · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines
Matches: Same natural finish· Same medium coverage
Differences: Slightly lighter· No skin-like finish claimed· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
50
Colour not compared · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Contains listed fragrance
Differences: Slightly deeper· Matte rather than natural finish· Full rather than medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish & visual result
52
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
50
Close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Matte rather than natural finish · Full rather than medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim a lightweight feel
Matches: Both claim a blurring effect· Claims long-wearing· Adds SPF 15
Differences: Matte rather than natural finish· Full rather than medium coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish & visual result
61
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
50
Colour not compared · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than natural finish · Full rather than medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly lighter· Olive rather than neutral undertone· Matte rather than natural finish
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish & visual result
64
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
50
Close colour · Matte · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Slightly lighter · Olive rather than neutral undertone · Matte rather than natural finish · Buildable rather than medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim a lightweight feel
Matches: Claims long-wearing· Claims transfer resistance· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Luminous rather than natural finish· Full rather than medium coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish & visual result
50
Wear & performance
51
Skin suitability
50
Close colour · Luminous · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Luminous rather than natural finish · Full rather than medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines
Matches: Both claim a blurring effect· Both claim not settling into lines· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly lighter· Described as medium, yours as rich deep· Slightly cooler undertone
Score details
Shade match
40
Finish & visual result
73
Wear & performance
100
Skin suitability
50
Close colour · Matte · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Described as medium, yours as rich deep · Slightly cooler undertone · Matte rather than natural finish · Buildable rather than medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed
Retailer shade note: for medium rich cool skin with a rosy hue
Low confidence· Digital matchRetailer descriptions disagree: described as medium, yours as rich deep
$39.50Ulta Beauty(product price)$4.50 less (10%)4.6 (919)
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim a blurring effect· Both claim not settling into lines
Differences: Described as medium tan, yours as rich deep· Slightly cooler undertone· Matte rather than natural finish
Score details
Shade match
40
Finish & visual result
73
Wear & performance
100
Skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Matte · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Described as medium tan, yours as rich deep · Slightly cooler undertone · Matte rather than natural finish · Buildable rather than medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed
Retailer shade note: for medium deep cool skin with a rosy hue
Low confidence· Digital matchRetailer descriptions disagree: described as medium tan, yours as rich deep
$39.50Ulta Beauty(product price)$4.50 less (10%)4.6 (919)
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Both claim a blurring effect· Both claim not settling into lines
Differences: Described as medium, yours as rich deep· Matte rather than natural finish· Buildable rather than medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
40
Finish & visual result
73
Wear & performance
100
Skin suitability
50
Close colour · Matte · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Described as medium, yours as rich deep · Matte rather than natural finish · Buildable rather than medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed
Retailer shade note: for medium rich neutral skin with a subtle golden hue
Low confidence· Digital matchRetailer descriptions disagree: described as medium, yours as rich deep
The closest shade to Doll 10 Peptide Bounce Flexible Foundation Deep/Rich (Medium · Neutral undertone) in each concealer range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Concealer shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest shade match works
Revolution Beauty Skin Silk Glow Tint Sheer Foundation Stick in Medium Tan Neutral, against Doll 10 Peptide Bounce Flexible Foundation in Deep/Rich. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeDeep/RichClosest shade matchMedium Tan NeutralHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall96
Colour60%94#ca8e76#ce9175Very close colourColour difference 1.7 (0 is identical)
Depth15%97MediumMediumSameDepth difference: 1.7
Retailer descriptionRich deepNot statedNo depth word in one descriptionNot compared
Finish35%56NaturalRadiantSome differenceRadiant finish rather than natural
Coverage30%80MediumLightCloseLight coverage rather than medium (buildable: one step of tolerance)
Skin-like finish20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a skin-like finish; the match does not list it
Blurring15%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a blurring or smoothing effect; the match does not list it
Wear & performance15% of overall · 2 of 5 compared40
Longevity30%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists long wear
Transfer resistance20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Settling20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims not settling into pores or fine lines; the match does not list it
Colour stability15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists colour stability (no oxidation)
Comfort15%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a comfortable, lightweight feel; the match does not list it
Skin suitability5% of overall50
Skin type100%50Not publishedCombination, dry, normal, oily, sensitiveSkin-type suitability not published for one product
Overall match 76/100Shade match 96/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Rude Perfect Base Foundation Stick in 16N Medium Neutral, against Doll 10 Peptide Bounce Flexible Foundation in Deep/Rich. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeDeep/RichClosest overall alternative16N Medium NeutralHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall95
Colour60%92#ca8e76#d18e71Very close colourColour difference 2.0 (0 is identical)
Depth15%98MediumMediumSameDepth difference: 1.0
Retailer descriptionRich deepNot statedNo depth word in one descriptionNot compared
Finish & visual result25% of overall · 3 of 4 compared72
Finish35%—not comparableNaturalNot listedNot comparedFinish not listed for one product
Coverage30%80MediumLightCloseLight coverage rather than medium (buildable: one step of tolerance)
Skin-like finish20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a skin-like finish; the match does not list it
Blurring15%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a blurring or smoothing effect
Wear & performance15% of overall · 2 of 5 compared66
Longevity30%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists long wear
Transfer resistance20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Settling20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims not settling into pores or fine lines; the match does not list it
Colour stability15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists colour stability (no oxidation)
Comfort15%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable, lightweight feel
Skin suitability5% of overall50
Skin type100%50Not publishedNot publishedSkin-type suitability not published for one product
Overall match 83/100Shade match 95/100Low confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Ulta Beauty$28 less (64%)
Sephora
Target
