Kamo Triple-Peptide Multi-Use Serum Foundation Deep 18W dupes and alternatives Drunk Elephant
4.8 (753)·Deep tan · Warm undertone
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar foundation overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Very close colour· Same natural finish· Claims a blurring effect
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Medium rather than full coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish & visual result
73
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
28
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Medium rather than full coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance · Not marketed for dry/oily skin
Retailer shade note: Very deep with neutral undertones
$16Ulta Beauty(product price)$26 less (62%)4.3 (699)
Matches: Very close colour· Same natural finish· Claims a blurring effect
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Medium rather than full coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish & visual result
73
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
84
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Medium rather than full coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim transfer resistance
Matches: Very close colour· Same natural finish· Claims a blurring effect
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Medium rather than full coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish & visual result
67
Wear & performance
59
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Medium rather than full coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance · Not marketed for oily skin
Matches: Very close colour· Same natural finish· Claims a blurring effect
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Medium rather than full coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish & visual result
67
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Medium rather than full coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance · Not marketed for oily skin · Contains drying alcohol
Matches: Same natural finish· Claims a blurring effect· Claims a lightweight feel
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Medium rather than full coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish & visual result
67
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
60
Close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Medium rather than full coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance · Not marketed for oily skin · Contains drying alcohol
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim transfer resistance· Claims a lightweight feel
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Matte rather than natural finish· Medium rather than full coverage
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish & visual result
61
Wear & performance
49
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Matte rather than natural finish · Medium rather than full coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Not marketed for normal skin
Retailer shade note: extra deep with neutral brown undertones
$38Ulta Beauty(product price)$4 less (10%)4.4 (657)
Matches: Claims a blurring effect· Both claim 12-hour wear· Claims not settling into lines
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Matte rather than natural finish· Medium rather than full coverage
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish & visual result
58
Wear & performance
58
Skin suitability
90
Close colour · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Matte rather than natural finish · Medium rather than full coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance
Retailer shade note: deep with neutral, subtle warm undertones
The closest shade to Drunk Elephant Kamo Triple-Peptide Multi-Use Serum Foundation Deep 18W (Deep tan · Warm undertone) in each concealer range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Concealer shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest shade match works
Estée Lauder Double Wear Stay-in-Place Foundation in 7W1 Deep Spice, against Drunk Elephant Kamo Triple-Peptide Multi-Use Serum Foundation in Deep 18W. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeDeep 18WClosest shade match7W1 Deep SpiceHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall92
Colour60%87#a66248#a76853Very close colourColour difference 2.7 (0 is identical)
Finish & visual result25% of overall · 3 of 4 compared61
Finish35%56NaturalMatteSome differenceMatte finish rather than natural
Coverage30%80FullMediumCloseMedium coverage rather than full (buildable: one step of tolerance)
Skin-like finish20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a skin-like finish; the match does not list it
Blurring15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists a blurring or smoothing effect
Wear & performance15% of overall · 3 of 5 compared49
Longevity30%2012-hour wear36-hour wearDifferent36-hour wear claimed against 12-hour wear
Transfer resistance20%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim transfer resistance
Settling20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists not settling into pores or fine lines
Colour stability15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists colour stability (no oxidation)
Comfort15%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims a comfortable, lightweight feel; your product does not list it
Skin suitability5% of overall60
Skin type100%60Normal, dry, oilyDry, combination, oilyBoth marketed for dry/oily skin
Overall match 76/100Shade match 92/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
ILIA True Skin Serum Foundation in Martinique SF11, against Drunk Elephant Kamo Triple-Peptide Multi-Use Serum Foundation in Deep 18W. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeDeep 18WClosest overall alternativeMartinique SF11How they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall87
Colour60%86#a66248#a8694bVery close colourColour difference 2.8 (0 is identical)
Finish & visual result25% of overall · 3 of 4 compared93
Finish35%100NaturalNaturalSameSame natural finish
Coverage30%80FullMediumCloseMedium coverage rather than full (buildable: one step of tolerance)
Skin-like finish20%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a skin-like finish
Blurring15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists a blurring or smoothing effect
Wear & performance15% of overall · 3 of 5 compared54
Longevity30%7012-hour wearLong-wearingSome differenceYour product claims 12-hour wear; the match says long-wearing without hours
Transfer resistance20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims transfer resistance; the match does not list it
Settling20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists not settling into pores or fine lines
Colour stability15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists colour stability (no oxidation)
Comfort15%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims a comfortable, lightweight feel; your product does not list it
Skin suitability5% of overall60
Skin type100%60Normal, dry, oilyNormal, dry, sensitiveBoth marketed for normal/dry skin
Overall match 82/100Shade match 87/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
SephoraCosts $6 more
