16HR Camo Concealer Medium Sand dupes and alternatives e.l.f. Cosmetics
4.2 (5,664)·Fair · Neutral undertone
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar concealer overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar concealer on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar concealer on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same matte finish· Same full coverage· Claims a blurring effect
Differences: Slightly lighter· Described as fair, yours as medium· Slightly warmer undertone
Score details
Shade match
40
Finish & visual result
89
Wear & performance
86
Skin suitability
100
Close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 39% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Described as fair, yours as medium · Slightly warmer undertone · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: fair skin with warm, golden undertones
Low confidence· Digital matchRetailer descriptions disagree: described as fair, yours as medium
Matches: Same matte finish· Same full coverage· Claims a blurring effect
Differences: Slightly lighter· Described as fair, yours as medium· Slightly cooler undertone
Score details
Shade match
40
Finish & visual result
89
Wear & performance
86
Skin suitability
100
Close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 39% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Described as fair, yours as medium · Slightly cooler undertone · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: fair skin with a balance of warm & cool undertones
Low confidence· Digital matchRetailer descriptions disagree: described as fair, yours as medium
Differences: Slightly lighter· Natural rather than matte finish· No long-wear claim
Score details
Shade match
69
Finish & visual result
56
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
0
Slight colour difference · Natural finish
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Natural rather than matte finish · No long-wear claim · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for oily/combination/normal skin
Matches: Same matte finish· Claims a blurring effect· Both claim 12-hour wear
Differences: Described as light medium, yours as medium· Slightly warmer undertone· Medium rather than full coverage
Score details
Shade match
40
Finish & visual result
81
Wear & performance
77
Skin suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 18% ingredient overlap
Differences: Described as light medium, yours as medium · Slightly warmer undertone · Medium rather than full coverage · Does not claim a lightweight feel
Retailer shade note: L2.8 - Light to medium with warm undertones, and a peach tone
Low confidence· Digital matchRetailer descriptions disagree: described as light medium, yours as medium
Matches: Same matte finish· Claims a blurring effect· Both claim 12-hour wear
Differences: Slightly lighter· Described as light, yours as medium· Slightly warmer undertone
Score details
Shade match
40
Finish & visual result
81
Wear & performance
77
Skin suitability
100
Close colour · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 18% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Described as light, yours as medium · Slightly warmer undertone · Medium rather than full coverage · Does not claim a lightweight feel
Retailer shade note: L2.2 - Light with warm undertones
Low confidence· Digital matchRetailer descriptions disagree: described as light, yours as medium
Matches: Same matte finish· Claims a blurring effect· Both claim 12-hour wear
Differences: Described as light medium, yours as medium· Slightly warmer undertone· Medium rather than full coverage
Score details
Shade match
40
Finish & visual result
81
Wear & performance
77
Skin suitability
100
Close colour · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 18% ingredient overlap
Differences: Described as light medium, yours as medium · Slightly warmer undertone · Medium rather than full coverage · Does not claim a lightweight feel
Retailer shade note: L2.6 - Light to medium with warm undertones
Low confidence· Digital matchRetailer descriptions disagree: described as light medium, yours as medium
Matches: Same matte finish· Claims a blurring effect· Both claim 12-hour wear
Differences: Slightly lighter· Described as light, yours as medium· Slightly warmer undertone
Score details
Shade match
40
Finish & visual result
81
Wear & performance
77
Skin suitability
100
Close colour · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 18% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Described as light, yours as medium · Slightly warmer undertone · Medium rather than full coverage · Does not claim a lightweight feel
Retailer shade note: L2.75 - Light with warm undertones
Low confidence· Digital matchRetailer descriptions disagree: described as light, yours as medium
The closest shade to e.l.f. Cosmetics 16HR Camo Concealer Medium Sand (Fair · Neutral undertone) in each foundation range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Foundation shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest shade match works
IT Cosmetics Bye Bye Under Eye Full Coverage Anti-Aging Water-Resistant Concealer in 11.0 Light Nude, against e.l.f. Cosmetics 16HR Camo Concealer in Medium Sand. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeMedium SandClosest shade match11.0 Light NudeHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall84
Colour60%74#e3ceb3#e6c8b0Close colourColour difference 4.5 (0 is identical)
Depth15%97FairFairSameDepth difference: 1.9
Retailer descriptionMediumNot statedNo depth word in one descriptionNot compared
Overall match 80/100Shade match 84/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
NARS Soft Matte Complete Concealer in Custard, against e.l.f. Cosmetics 16HR Camo Concealer in Medium Sand. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeMedium SandClosest overall alternativeCustardHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall83
Colour60%71#e3ceb3#efccabClose colourColour difference 4.7 (0 is identical)
Depth15%99FairFairSameDepth difference: 0.5
Retailer descriptionMediumMediumBoth described as mediumThe retailers describe the same depth
Finish & visual result25% of overall · 3 of 4 compared81
Finish35%100MatteMatteSameSame matte finish
Coverage30%80FullMediumCloseMedium coverage rather than full (buildable: one step of tolerance)
Skin-like finish20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists a skin-like finish
Blurring15%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims a blurring or smoothing effect; your product does not list it
Wear & performance15% of overall · 3 of 5 compared77
Longevity30%8016-hour wear12-hour wearClose12-hour wear claimed against 16-hour wear
Transfer resistance20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Settling20%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim not settling into pores or fine lines
Colour stability15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists colour stability (no oxidation)
Comfort15%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a comfortable, lightweight feel; the match does not list it
Skin suitability5% of overall100
Skin type100%100Oily, combination, normalNormal, combination, oilyBoth marketed for oily/combination/normal skin
Overall match 82/100Shade match 83/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
SephoraCosts $6 more
View at Target
