Hydrating Camo Concealer Medium Warm dupes and alternatives e.l.f. Cosmetics
4.3 (8,153)·Light · Warm · golden undertone
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar concealer overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar concealer on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar concealer on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Very close colour· Claims a skin-like finish· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly deeper· Neutral rather than warm undertone· Radiant rather than satin finish
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish & visual result
70
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
67
Very close colour · Radiant · Medium-full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Neutral rather than warm undertone · Radiant rather than satin finish · Medium-full rather than full coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for combination skin · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: medium with neutral/pink undertones
Matches: Claims a skin-like finish· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Radiant rather than satin finish· Medium-full rather than full coverage
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish & visual result
70
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
67
Close colour · Radiant · Medium-full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Radiant rather than satin finish · Medium-full rather than full coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for combination skin · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: tan with neutral/golden undertones
Matches: Claims a skin-like finish· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly deeper· Neutral rather than warm undertone· Radiant rather than satin finish
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish & visual result
70
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
67
Close colour · Radiant · Medium-full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Neutral rather than warm undertone · Radiant rather than satin finish · Medium-full rather than full coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for combination skin · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: medium with yellow/neutral undertones
The closest shade to e.l.f. Cosmetics Hydrating Camo Concealer Medium Warm (Light · Warm · golden undertone) in each foundation range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Foundation shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest match works
Charlotte Tilbury Beautiful Skin Medium to Full Coverage Radiant Concealer in 11.5 Tan, against e.l.f. Cosmetics Hydrating Camo Concealer in Medium Warm. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeMedium WarmClosest match11.5 TanHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall88
Colour60%81#f2b187#f9b27aClose colourColour difference 3.5 (0 is identical)
Depth15%98LightLightSameDepth difference: 1.1
Retailer descriptionMedium tanTanSome differenceRetailer descriptions one depth band apart
Finish & visual result25% of overall · 3 of 4 compared70
Finish35%78SatinRadiantCloseRadiant finish rather than satin
Coverage30%80FullMedium-fullCloseMedium-full coverage rather than full
Skin-like finish20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims a skin-like finish; your product does not list it
Blurring15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists a blurring or smoothing effect
Wear & performance15% of overall · 3 of 5 compared68
Longevity30%70Long-wearing16-hour wearSome differenceThe match claims 16-hour wear; your product says long-wearing without hours
Transfer resistance20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Settling20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims not settling into pores or fine lines; the match does not list it
Colour stability15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists colour stability (no oxidation)
Comfort15%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable, lightweight feel
Skin suitability5% of overall67
Skin type100%67Dry, combination, normalDry, normalBoth marketed for dry/normal skin
Overall match 80/100Shade match 88/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Ulta Beauty(product price)Costs $28 more
View at Sephora
