Hydrating Camo Concealer Medium Warm dupes and alternatives e.l.f. Cosmetics
4.3 (8,153)·Light · Warm · golden undertone
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar concealer overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar concealer on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar concealer on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same warm undertone· Claims a skin-like finish· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Radiant rather than satin finish· Medium-full rather than full coverage· Does not claim not settling into lines
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish & visual result
70
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
67
Close colour · Radiant · Medium-full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Radiant rather than satin finish · Medium-full rather than full coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for combination skin · Contains listed fragrance
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Claims a skin-like finish
Differences: Slightly deeper· Radiant rather than satin finish· Medium rather than full coverage
Score details
Shade match
91
Finish & visual result
70
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
100
Very close colour · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Radiant rather than satin finish · Medium rather than full coverage · No long-wear claim · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim a lightweight feel
Retailer shade note: medium tan with warm peach undertones
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same full coverage· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Slightly deeper· Natural rather than satin finish· Does not claim not settling into lines
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish & visual result
88
Wear & performance
51
Skin suitability
33
Close colour · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Natural rather than satin finish · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for dry/combination skin · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: medium skin with warm yellow undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Claims a skin-like finish· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly deeper· Neutral rather than warm undertone· Radiant rather than satin finish
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish & visual result
70
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
67
Very close colour · Radiant · Medium-full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Neutral rather than warm undertone · Radiant rather than satin finish · Medium-full rather than full coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for combination skin · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: medium with neutral/pink undertones
Matches: Same warm undertone· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Natural rather than satin finish· No long-wear claim· Does not claim not settling into lines
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish & visual result
78
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
0
Close colour · Natural finish
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than satin finish · No long-wear claim · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for dry/combination/normal skin
Matches: Similar undertone (neutral vs warm)· Claims a skin-like finish
Differences: Slightly deeper· Radiant rather than satin finish· Medium rather than full coverage
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish & visual result
70
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
100
Close colour · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Radiant rather than satin finish · Medium rather than full coverage · No long-wear claim · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim a lightweight feel
Retailer shade note: medium tan with neutral peach undertones
Matches: Claims a skin-like finish· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Radiant rather than satin finish· Medium-full rather than full coverage
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish & visual result
70
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
67
Close colour · Radiant · Medium-full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Radiant rather than satin finish · Medium-full rather than full coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for combination skin · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: tan with neutral/golden undertones
Matches: Claims a skin-like finish· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly deeper· Neutral rather than warm undertone· Radiant rather than satin finish
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish & visual result
70
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
67
Close colour · Radiant · Medium-full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Neutral rather than warm undertone · Radiant rather than satin finish · Medium-full rather than full coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for combination skin · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: medium with yellow/neutral undertones
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same full coverage· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Slightly deeper· Matte rather than satin finish· Does not claim not settling into lines
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish & visual result
65
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
50
Close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 24% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Matte rather than satin finish · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Contains drying alcohol
The closest shade to e.l.f. Cosmetics Hydrating Camo Concealer Medium Warm (Light · Warm · golden undertone) in each foundation range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Foundation shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest match works
Fenty Beauty Pro Filt'r Instant Retouch Longwear Liquid Concealer in 250, against e.l.f. Cosmetics Hydrating Camo Concealer in Medium Warm. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeMedium WarmClosest match250How they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall97
Colour60%95#f2b187#f2b28dLooks identicalColour difference 1.5 (0 is identical)
Depth15%99LightLightSameDepth difference: 0.5
Retailer descriptionMedium tanMediumSome differenceRetailer descriptions one depth band apart
Overall match 87/100Shade match 97/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
SephoraCosts $28 more
