Hydrating Camo Concealer Medium Warm dupes and alternatives e.l.f. Cosmetics
4.3 (8,153)·Light · Warm · golden undertone
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar concealer overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar concealer on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar concealer on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same full coverage· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Slightly deeper· Natural rather than satin finish· Does not claim not settling into lines
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish & visual result
88
Wear & performance
51
Skin suitability
33
Close colour · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Natural rather than satin finish · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for dry/combination skin · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: medium skin with warm yellow undertones
The closest shade to e.l.f. Cosmetics Hydrating Camo Concealer Medium Warm (Light · Warm · golden undertone) in each foundation range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Foundation shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest shade match works
Huda Beauty #FauxFilter Matte Buildable Coverage Waterproof Concealer in Graham Cracker 4.1 Golden, against e.l.f. Cosmetics Hydrating Camo Concealer in Medium Warm. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeMedium WarmClosest shade matchGraham Cracker 4.1 GoldenHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall89
Colour60%85#f2b187#e4a97eVery close colourColour difference 3.0 (0 is identical)
Finish35%34SatinMatteDifferentMatte finish rather than satin
Coverage30%100FullFullSameSame full coverage
Skin-like finish20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims a skin-like finish; your product does not list it
Blurring15%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims a blurring or smoothing effect; your product does not list it
Wear & performance15% of overall · 4 of 5 compared75
Longevity30%100Long-wearingLong-wearingSameBoth products claim long wear
Transfer resistance20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims transfer resistance; your product does not list it
Settling20%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim not settling into pores or fine lines
Colour stability15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists colour stability (no oxidation)
Comfort15%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a comfortable, lightweight feel; the match does not list it
Skin suitability5% of overall60
Skin type100%60Dry, combination, normalNormal, dry, oilyBoth marketed for dry/normal skin
Overall match 77/100Shade match 89/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
IT Cosmetics Bye Bye Under Eye Full Coverage Anti-Aging Water-Resistant Concealer in 25.5 Medium Bronze, against e.l.f. Cosmetics Hydrating Camo Concealer in Medium Warm. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeMedium WarmClosest overall alternative25.5 Medium BronzeHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall72
Colour60%85#f2b187#e8b391Very close colourColour difference 2.9 (0 is identical)
Depth15%99LightLightSameDepth difference: 0.5
Retailer descriptionMedium tanNot statedNo depth word in one descriptionNot compared
Overall match 79/100Shade match 72/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
SephoraCosts $28 more
