Putty Bronzer Cabana Cutie dupes and alternatives e.l.f. Cosmetics
4.2 (819)·Rose · Deep / dark
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar bronzer overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 25%, wear and performance 15%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar bronzer on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar bronzer on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same finish: matte· Claims transfer resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Powder rather than cream (format)· 24-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish, pigmentation & format
75
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
56
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Powder rather than cream (format) · 24-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim hydration · Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim comfort· Both claim hydration
Differences: Brown rather than rose· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish, pigmentation & format
77
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
84
Very close colour · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown rather than rose · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Dry, Combination, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Retailer shade note: warm undertone, natural finish for deep skin tones
Matches: Same finish: matte· Claims transfer resistance· Both claim comfort
Differences: Deeper· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Powder rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish, pigmentation & format
75
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
88
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Powder rather than cream (format) · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Brown rather than rose· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· 16-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown rather than rose · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · 16-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Sold as contour, rated here for use as bronzer (suited)
Differences: Brown rather than rose· Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Normal, Dry, Combination rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish, pigmentation & format
68
Wear & performance
50
Comfort & skin suitability
84
Close colour · Natural · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown rather than rose · Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same finish: matte· Both claim comfort· Both claim hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Powder rather than cream (format)· 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
70
Finish, pigmentation & format
78
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
84
Slight colour difference · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Powder rather than cream (format) · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Claims transfer resistance· Both claim comfort· Both claim hydration
Differences: Brown rather than rose· Dewy rather than matte (finish)· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish, pigmentation & format
54
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Close colour · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown rather than rose · Dewy rather than matte (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than cream (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Differences: Brown rather than rose· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
65
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown rather than rose · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Both claim hydration· Same skin types: combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Nude rather than rose
Score details
Shade match
61
Finish, pigmentation & format
77
Wear & performance
50
Comfort & skin suitability
76
Slight colour difference · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Nude rather than rose · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Does not claim comfort
Sold as blush, rated here for use as bronzer (suited)
Differences: Deeper· Brown rather than rose· Powder rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
61
Finish, pigmentation & format
78
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
88
Slight colour difference · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Brown rather than rose · Powder rather than cream (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Use as bronzer: possible
Retailer shade note: deep brown with purple undertone
Matches: Same finish: matte· Both claim comfort· Both claim hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Powder rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
60
Finish, pigmentation & format
78
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
84
Visibly different colour · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Powder rather than cream (format) · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same pigmentation: opaque· Claims waterproof· Both claim hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Brown rather than rose· Liquid rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
60
Finish, pigmentation & format
79
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
76
Slight colour difference · Natural · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Brown rather than rose · Liquid rather than cream (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same format: cream· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Brown rather than rose
Score details
Shade match
46
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
50
Comfort & skin suitability
84
Slight colour difference · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Brown rather than rose · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same finish: matte· Claims transfer resistance· Same skin types: combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Brown rather than rose
Score details
Shade match
58
Finish, pigmentation & format
78
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
64
Slight colour difference · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Brown rather than rose · Powder rather than cream (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Retailer shade note: deep skin tones, neutral undertones
Matches: Same format: cream· Both claim comfort· Both claim hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Brown rather than rose· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
54
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
84
Visibly different colour · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Brown rather than rose · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Use as bronzer: possible
Retailer shade note: rich to very rich neutral undertone
Matches: Same format: cream· Both claim comfort· Both claim hydration
Differences: Lighter· Golden rather than rose· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
54
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
84
Slight colour difference · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Golden rather than rose · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Retailer shade note: tan-deep to deep with a warm golden undertone
Matches: Same finish: matte· Both claim comfort· Both claim hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Brown rather than rose· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
56
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
68
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Brown rather than rose · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than cream (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Sensitive rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Sold as contour, rated here for use as bronzer (suited)
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Bronze rather than rose· Powder rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
57
Finish, pigmentation & format
78
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Slight colour difference · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Bronze rather than rose · Powder rather than cream (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Normal, Combination, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same finish: matte· Both claim comfort· Both claim hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Powder rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
54
Finish, pigmentation & format
78
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
84
Visibly different colour · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Powder rather than cream (format) · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
rhode Pocket Bronze Long-Wearing Cream Bronzer in anklet, against e.l.f. Cosmetics Putty Bronzer in Cabana Cutie. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeCabana CutieClosest matchankletHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall90
Colour55%87#6a4743#734e48Very close colourColour difference 2.7 (0 is identical)
Depth25%90Deep / darkDeep / darkSameDepth difference 4.5 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedNeutralUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family20%100RoseRoseSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format25% of overall · 2 of 3 compared83
Finish50%—not comparableMatteNot listedNot listed for eitherA finish not listed for one product
Pigmentation25%65OpaqueBuildableSome differenceBuildable rather than opaque
Format25%100CreamCreamSameBoth cream
Wear & performance15% of overall · 1 of 3 compared40
Longevity50%40Not listedLong-wearingSome differenceThe match claims long wear; your product does not list it
Transfer resistance30%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Skin types40%60Combination, Dry, Normal, Oily, SensitiveNormal, Dry, CombinationSome differenceBoth marketed for combination, dry, normal skin
Overall match 80/100Shade match 90/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.