Soft Glam Satin Foundation 63 Rich Warm dupes and alternatives e.l.f. Cosmetics
4.5 (40,486)·Very deep · Warm undertone
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar foundation overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Very close colour· Same medium coverage· Adds SPF 45
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Radiant rather than natural finish· No long-wear claim
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish & visual result
76
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
75
Very close colour · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Radiant rather than natural finish · No long-wear claim · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for combination skin · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: deepest with neutral rich-brown undertones
The closest shade to e.l.f. Cosmetics Soft Glam Satin Foundation 63 Rich Warm (Very deep · Warm undertone) in each concealer range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Concealer shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest shade match works
Range Beauty True Intentions Skin-Soothing Hydrating Foundation in Mirage, against e.l.f. Cosmetics Soft Glam Satin Foundation in 63 Rich Warm. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade63 Rich WarmClosest shade matchMirageHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall93
Colour60%96#5c3726#5e3626Looks identicalColour difference 1.2 (0 is identical)
Overall match 85/100Shade match 93/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
NARS Light Reflecting Foundation in Port Louis, against e.l.f. Cosmetics Soft Glam Satin Foundation in 63 Rich Warm. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade63 Rich WarmClosest overall alternativePort LouisHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall87
Colour60%93#5c3726#603626Very close colourColour difference 1.7 (0 is identical)
Overall match 86/100Shade match 87/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
SephoraCosts $47 more
