Soft Glam Satin Foundation 63 Rich Warm dupes and alternatives e.l.f. Cosmetics
4.5 (40,486)·Very deep · Warm undertone
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar foundation overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Very close colour· Same natural finish· Claims a blurring effect
Differences: Olive rather than warm undertone· Buildable rather than medium coverage· Does not claim not settling into lines
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish & visual result
89
Wear & performance
82
Skin suitability
75
Very close colour · Natural · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 17% ingredient overlap
Differences: Olive rather than warm undertone · Buildable rather than medium coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for combination skin
Retailer shade note: Ultra Rich skin with neutral-olive undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Same natural finish· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Slightly lighter· Buildable rather than medium coverage· Does not claim not settling into lines
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
82
Skin suitability
25
Very close colour · Natural · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Buildable rather than medium coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for combination/dry/oily skin
Matches: Very close colour· Claims a blurring effect· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Slightly lighter· Matte rather than natural finish· Buildable rather than medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish & visual result
70
Wear & performance
82
Skin suitability
92
Very close colour · Matte · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Matte rather than natural finish · Buildable rather than medium coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Contains drying alcohol
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Claims a blurring effect· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Matte rather than natural finish· Full rather than medium coverage· Does not claim not settling into lines
Score details
Shade match
89
Finish & visual result
62
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
92
Looks identical · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than natural finish · Full rather than medium coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim a lightweight feel
Matches: Same natural finish· Claims transfer resistance· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly lighter· Olive rather than warm undertone· Full rather than medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish & visual result
91
Wear & performance
61
Skin suitability
75
Close colour · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Olive rather than warm undertone · Full rather than medium coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for oily skin
Retailer shade note: D7 - very deep with neutral undertones and an olive tone
Matches: Very close colour· Same medium coverage· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Matte rather than natural finish· Does not claim not settling into lines· Does not claim a lightweight feel
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish & visual result
76
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
46
Very close colour · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than natural finish · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for combination/dry skin
Matches: Very close colour· Same natural finish· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Slightly deeper· Slightly cooler undertone· Full rather than medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish & visual result
91
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
92
Very close colour · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Slightly cooler undertone · Full rather than medium coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: very deep complexion with cool red undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Claims a blurring effect· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Olive rather than warm undertone· Matte rather than natural finish· Full rather than medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish & visual result
62
Wear & performance
75
Skin suitability
75
Very close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Olive rather than warm undertone · Matte rather than natural finish · Full rather than medium coverage · Not marketed for dry skin · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: very deep skin with very warm, golden or olive undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Same medium coverage· Adds SPF 45
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Radiant rather than natural finish· No long-wear claim
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish & visual result
76
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
75
Very close colour · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Radiant rather than natural finish · No long-wear claim · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for combination skin · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: deepest with neutral rich-brown undertones
The closest shade to e.l.f. Cosmetics Soft Glam Satin Foundation 63 Rich Warm (Very deep · Warm undertone) in each concealer range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Concealer shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest shade match works
Lawless Forget The Filler Skin-Plumping Line-Smoothing Foundation in 31D, against e.l.f. Cosmetics Soft Glam Satin Foundation in 63 Rich Warm. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade63 Rich WarmClosest shade match31DHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall98
Colour60%96#5c3726#5a3522Looks identicalColour difference 1.1 (0 is identical)
Overall match 84/100Shade match 98/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
KimChi Chic Beauty A Really Good Foundation in 140D, against e.l.f. Cosmetics Soft Glam Satin Foundation in 63 Rich Warm. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade63 Rich WarmClosest overall alternative140DHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall86
Colour60%92#5c3726#5d3c2bVery close colourColour difference 2.0 (0 is identical)
Overall match 87/100Shade match 86/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Ulta Beauty
SephoraCosts $47 more
