Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar concealer overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar concealer on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar concealer on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same full coverage· Both claim a blurring effect· Both claim transfer resistance
Differences: Slightly lighter· Neutral rather than cool undertone· Matte rather than natural finish
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish & visual result
81
Wear & performance
70
Skin suitability
60
Close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 16% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Neutral rather than cool undertone · Matte rather than natural finish · Not marketed for dry skin · Contains drying alcohol
Retailer shade note: for deep skin with neutral to golden undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Same full coverage· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Matte rather than natural finish· Does not claim transfer resistance
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish & visual result
81
Wear & performance
47
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Matte rather than natural finish · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for dry skin · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: very deep skin with warm, peach undertones
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same full coverage· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Slightly lighter· Matte rather than natural finish· Does not claim transfer resistance
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish & visual result
81
Wear & performance
47
Skin suitability
60
Slight colour difference · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Matte rather than natural finish · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for dry skin · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: very deep skin with a balance of warm & cool undertones
$15.99Ulta Beauty(product price)$22.01 less (58%)4.2 (1,617)
Matches: Same full coverage· Both claim 24-hour wear· Both claim transfer resistance
Differences: Slightly deeper· Matte rather than natural finish· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish & visual result
70
Wear & performance
75
Skin suitability
50
Close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 19% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Matte rather than natural finish · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Contains listed fragrance
Matches: Both claim a blurring effect· Claims not settling into lines
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Matte rather than natural finish· Medium rather than full coverage
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish & visual result
73
Wear & performance
38
Skin suitability
60
Close colour · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 18% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Matte rather than natural finish · Medium rather than full coverage · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for dry skin
Retailer shade note: D3 - Deep with neutral undertones
Matches: Same full coverage· Both claim a blurring effect· Claims not settling into lines
Differences: Slightly deeper· Olive rather than cool undertone· Matte rather than natural finish
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish & visual result
81
Wear & performance
47
Skin suitability
60
Close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Olive rather than cool undertone · Matte rather than natural finish · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for dry skin · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: very deep skin with very warm, golden or olive undertones
Matches: Same full coverage· Both claim a blurring effect· Both claim 24-hour wear
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Slightly deeper· Slightly warmer undertone
Score details
Shade match
60
Finish & visual result
81
Wear & performance
75
Skin suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Slightly deeper · Slightly warmer undertone · Matte rather than natural finish · Does not claim a lightweight feel
Retailer shade note: Deep with neutral warm undertones
The closest shade to Estée Lauder Double Wear Stay-in-Place 24-Hour Concealer 8C (Very deep · Cool undertone) in each foundation range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Foundation shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest shade match works
Lancôme Teint Idole Ultra Wear All Over Full Coverage Concealer in 550 Suede C, against Estée Lauder Double Wear Stay-in-Place 24-Hour Concealer in 8C. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade8CClosest shade match550 Suede CHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall81
Colour60%72#653721#6b4433Close colourColour difference 4.6 (0 is identical)
Transfer resistance20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims transfer resistance; the match does not list it
Settling20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims not settling into pores or fine lines; your product does not list it
Colour stability15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists colour stability (no oxidation)
Comfort15%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable, lightweight feel
Skin suitability5% of overall28
Skin type100%28Normal, dry, oilyDry, combination, sensitiveBoth marketed for dry skin
Overall match 75/100Shade match 81/100High confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
MAC Cosmetics Studio Fix 36HR Smooth Angles Hydrating Concealer in NW55, against Estée Lauder Double Wear Stay-in-Place 24-Hour Concealer in 8C. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade8CClosest overall alternativeNW55How they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall81
Colour60%85#653721#703d22Close colourColour difference 3.0 (0 is identical)
Overall match 79/100Shade match 81/100High confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
31 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Sephora$2 less (5%)
