Double Wear Stay-in-Place Foundation 7C1 Rich Mahogany dupes and alternatives Estée Lauder
4.3 (20,395)·Deep · Cool undertone
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar foundation overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same matte finish· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Neutral rather than cool undertone· Full rather than medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
66
Finish & visual result
91
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
84
Slight colour difference · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Neutral rather than cool undertone · Full rather than medium coverage · Does not claim transfer resistance
Differences: Natural rather than matte finish · Buildable rather than medium coverage · No long-wear claim · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim a lightweight feel
$16Ulta Beauty(product price)$36 less (69%)4.3 (2,230)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Adds SPF 30
Differences: Slightly deeper· Radiant rather than matte finish· Full rather than medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish & visual result
43
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
90
Close colour · Radiant · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Radiant rather than matte finish · Full rather than medium coverage · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim a lightweight feel
Matches: Same cool undertone· Claims a skin-like finish· Claims colour stability
Differences: Slightly deeper· Natural rather than matte finish· Full rather than medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish & visual result
61
Wear & performance
63
Skin suitability
60
Slight colour difference · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Natural rather than matte finish · Full rather than medium coverage · Does not claim transfer resistance · Not marketed for combination skin
Retailer shade note: deep skin with cool red undertones
$15.99Ulta Beauty(product price)$36.01 less (69%)4.5 (1,466)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Claims not settling into lines
Differences: Slightly deeper· Radiant rather than matte finish· Buildable rather than medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish & visual result
53
Wear & performance
51
Skin suitability
84
Close colour · Radiant · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 22% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Radiant rather than matte finish · Buildable rather than medium coverage · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim a lightweight feel
$11.99Ulta Beauty(product price)$40.01 less (77%)4.4 (182,841)
Matches: Same matte finish· Same medium coverage· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Neutral rather than cool undertone· Does not claim transfer resistance
Score details
Shade match
67
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
45
Skin suitability
30
Slight colour difference · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Neutral rather than cool undertone · Does not claim transfer resistance · Not marketed for dry/combination skin · Contains drying alcohol
Matches: Same medium coverage· Claims a blurring effect· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly deeper· Neutral rather than cool undertone· Natural rather than matte finish
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish & visual result
70
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
60
Close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Neutral rather than cool undertone · Natural rather than matte finish · Does not claim transfer resistance · Not marketed for oily skin
Retailer shade note: D4.5 - deep with neutral undertone
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same medium coverage· Claims a blurring effect
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Slightly deeper· Natural rather than matte finish
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish & visual result
70
Wear & performance
52
Skin suitability
60
Slight colour difference · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 28% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Slightly deeper · Natural rather than matte finish · Does not claim transfer resistance · Not marketed for dry skin
The closest shade to Estée Lauder Double Wear Stay-in-Place Foundation 7C1 Rich Mahogany (Deep · Cool undertone) in each concealer range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Concealer shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest match works
NYX Professional Makeup Bare With Me Blur Tint Foundation in 19: Deep Golden, against Estée Lauder Double Wear Stay-in-Place Foundation in 7C1 Rich Mahogany. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade7C1 Rich MahoganyClosest match19: Deep GoldenHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall89
Colour60%85#a05241#974c37Close colourColour difference 3.1 (0 is identical)
Depth15%92DeepDeepSameDepth difference: 4.0
Retailer descriptionVery deepDeepSome differenceRetailer descriptions one depth band apart
Finish & visual result25% of overall · 3 of 4 compared89
Finish35%100MatteMatteSameSame matte finish
Coverage30%100MediumMediumSameSame medium coverage
Skin-like finish20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists a skin-like finish
Blurring15%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims a blurring or smoothing effect; your product does not list it
Wear & performance15% of overall · 4 of 5 compared58
Longevity30%2036-hour wear16-hour wearDifferent16-hour wear claimed against 36-hour wear
Transfer resistance20%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim transfer resistance
Settling20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims not settling into pores or fine lines; your product does not list it
Colour stability15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists colour stability (no oxidation)
Comfort15%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable, lightweight feel
Skin suitability5% of overall60
Skin type100%60Dry, combination, oilyCombination, normal, oilyBoth marketed for combination/oily skin
Overall match 83/100Shade match 89/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.