Cheeks Out Freestyle Cream Blush 09 Cool Berry dupes and alternatives Fenty Beauty
4.4 (1,714)·Mauve · Cool · Deep / dark
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar blush overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 25%, wear and performance 15%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar blush on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar blush on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same cool undertone· Claims comfort· Claims hydration
Differences: Powder rather than cream (format)· Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)· Does not claim waterproof
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish, pigmentation & format
65
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
48
Slight colour difference · Dewy
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Powder rather than cream (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Liquid rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish, pigmentation & format
71
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than cream (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same format: cream· Claims transfer resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Rose rather than mauve· Matte rather than shimmer (finish)
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish, pigmentation & format
54
Wear & performance
64
Comfort & skin suitability
64
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Rose rather than mauve · Matte rather than shimmer (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same finish: shimmer· Claims comfort
Differences: Lighter· Plum rather than mauve· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
67
Finish, pigmentation & format
75
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
64
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Plum rather than mauve · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Powder rather than cream (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same finish: shimmer· Claims comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Plum rather than mauve
Score details
Shade match
62
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
48
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Plum rather than mauve · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Retailer shade note: A burgundy with golden shimmer
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
67
Finish, pigmentation & format
71
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
70
Slight colour difference · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than cream (format) · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone· Rose rather than mauve· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
69
Finish, pigmentation & format
71
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone · Rose rather than mauve · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than cream (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same finish: shimmer· Claims comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Pink rather than mauve
Score details
Shade match
67
Finish, pigmentation & format
75
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Pink rather than mauve · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Powder rather than cream (format) · 16-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Claims comfort· Claims hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Matte rather than shimmer (finish)· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish, pigmentation & format
50
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
64
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 21% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Matte rather than shimmer (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone· Terracotta rather than mauve· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
62
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
53
Close colour · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 20% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone · Terracotta rather than mauve · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Claims comfort· Same skin types: combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Neutral rather than cool undertone
Score details
Shade match
63
Finish, pigmentation & format
75
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
70
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Neutral rather than cool undertone · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Powder rather than cream (format) · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Neutral rather than cool undertone· Rose rather than mauve
Score details
Shade match
62
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
53
Slight colour difference · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 20% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Neutral rather than cool undertone · Rose rather than mauve · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same skin types: combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Plum rather than mauve· Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
61
Finish, pigmentation & format
67
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Metallic · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Plum rather than mauve · Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than cream (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Pink rather than mauve
Score details
Shade match
62
Finish, pigmentation & format
71
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Slight colour difference · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Pink rather than mauve · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than cream (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Warm rather than cool undertone· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
57
Finish, pigmentation & format
78
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
70
Slight colour difference · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 20% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Warm rather than cool undertone · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same cool undertone· Claims hydration· Same skin types: combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Plum rather than mauve· Natural rather than shimmer (finish)
Score details
Shade match
66
Finish, pigmentation & format
55
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Slight colour difference · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Plum rather than mauve · Natural rather than shimmer (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than cream (format) · Does not claim waterproof
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone· Pink rather than mauve· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
62
Finish, pigmentation & format
71
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone · Pink rather than mauve · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Gel rather than cream (format) · Does not claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Warm rather than cool undertone· Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
60
Finish, pigmentation & format
73
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
53
Slight colour difference · Dewy · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Warm rather than cool undertone · Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Normal, Dry, Sensitive rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone· Pink rather than mauve· Matte rather than shimmer (finish)
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish, pigmentation & format
44
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone · Pink rather than mauve · Matte rather than shimmer (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than cream (format) · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Sold as lipstick, rated here for use as blush (suited)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Claims comfort· Claims hydration
Differences: Brown / nude rather than mauve· Matte rather than shimmer (finish)· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish, pigmentation & format
44
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown / nude rather than mauve · Matte rather than shimmer (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than cream (format) · 10-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Sold as lipstick, rated here for use as blush (suited)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Claims comfort· Claims hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Natural rather than shimmer (finish)
Score details
Shade match
68
Finish, pigmentation & format
52
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
48
Slight colour difference · Natural · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Natural rather than shimmer (finish) · Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone· Rose rather than mauve· Matte rather than shimmer (finish)
Score details
Shade match
67
Finish, pigmentation & format
50
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
64
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 21% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone · Rose rather than mauve · Matte rather than shimmer (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same cool undertone· Claims comfort· Claims hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Rose rather than mauve
Score details
Shade match
61
Finish, pigmentation & format
61
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
64
Slight colour difference · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Rose rather than mauve · Natural rather than shimmer (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same cool undertone· Claims comfort· Claims hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Matte rather than shimmer (finish)
Score details
Shade match
65
Finish, pigmentation & format
50
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
64
Visibly different colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 21% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Matte rather than shimmer (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Westman Atelier Baby Cheeks Lip + Cheek Cream Blush Stick in Garconne, against Fenty Beauty Cheeks Out Freestyle Cream Blush in 09 Cool Berry. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade09 Cool BerryClosest shade matchGarconneHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall95
Colour55%92#9b6160#a16665Very close colourColour difference 2.1 (0 is identical)
Depth15%95Deep / darkMediumCloseDepth difference 3.0 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone15%100CoolCoolSameSame product undertone
Colour family15%100MauveMauveSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format25% of overall · 2 of 3 compared65
Finish50%47ShimmerNaturalSome differenceNatural finish rather than shimmer
Pigmentation25%—not comparableOpaqueNot listedNot listed for eitherAn opacity not listed for one product
Format25%100CreamCreamSameBoth cream
Wear & performance15% of overall · 1 of 3 compared40
Longevity50%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists long wear
Transfer resistance30%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Waterproof20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims waterproof wear; the match does not list it
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 2 of 3 compared53
Comfort40%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists a comfortable feel
Hydration20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims hydration; your product does not list it
Skin types40%60Combination, Dry, Normal, Oily, SensitiveNormal, Dry, CombinationSome differenceBoth marketed for combination, dry, normal skin
Overall match 77/100Shade match 95/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
CoverGirl Trublend Skin Enhancer Balm Blush Stick in Sleepy Mauve, against Fenty Beauty Cheeks Out Freestyle Cream Blush in 09 Cool Berry. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade09 Cool BerryClosest overall alternativeSleepy MauveHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall91
Colour55%85#9b6160#a66664Very close colourColour difference 3.0 (0 is identical)
Depth15%92Deep / darkMediumCloseDepth difference 3.8 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone15%100CoolCoolSameSame product undertone
Colour family15%100MauveMauveSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format25% of overall78
Finish50%80ShimmerDewyCloseDewy finish rather than shimmer
Pigmentation25%65OpaqueBuildableSome differenceBuildable rather than opaque
Format25%85CreamStickCloseStick rather than cream
Wear & performance15% of overall · 1 of 3 compared40
Longevity50%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists long wear
Transfer resistance30%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Waterproof20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims waterproof wear; the match does not list it
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 2 of 3 compared70
Comfort40%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims a comfortable feel; your product does not list it
Hydration20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists hydration
Overall match 79/100Shade match 91/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Sephora
Ulta BeautyCosts $8 more
