Eaze Drop Blur + Smooth Foundation Stick 12 dupes and alternatives Fenty Beauty
4.3 (1,119)·Medium light · Warm · golden undertone
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar foundation overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Same natural finish
Differences: Medium rather than light coverage· No blurring effect claimed· Does not claim transfer resistance
Score details
Shade match
95
Finish & visual result
85
Wear & performance
58
Skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Medium rather than light coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability
Retailer shade note: medium with warm yellow undertones
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same natural finish· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Medium rather than light coverage· No skin-like finish claimed· Does not claim colour stability
Score details
Shade match
90
Finish & visual result
82
Wear & performance
73
Skin suitability
50
Close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Medium rather than light coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim colour stability · Contains listed fragrance · Contains drying alcohol
Matches: Same warm undertone· Both claim a skin-like finish· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Radiant rather than natural finish· Medium rather than light coverage· Does not claim transfer resistance
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
58
Skin suitability
50
Close colour · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Radiant rather than natural finish · Medium rather than light coverage · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same natural finish· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Medium rather than light coverage· No skin-like finish claimed· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish & visual result
73
Wear & performance
70
Skin suitability
50
Close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Medium rather than light coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability
Retailer shade note: medium-dark with yellow undertones
Matches: Both claim a skin-like finish· Both claim a blurring effect· Both claim transfer resistance
Differences: Slightly lighter· Olive rather than warm undertone· Matte rather than natural finish
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
70
Skin suitability
50
Close colour · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Olive rather than warm undertone · Matte rather than natural finish · Medium rather than light coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same natural finish· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Medium rather than light coverage· No skin-like finish claimed· Does not claim transfer resistance
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish & visual result
82
Wear & performance
58
Skin suitability
50
Close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Medium rather than light coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability · Contains listed fragrance · Contains drying alcohol
Retailer shade note: for darker medium skin with warm undertones
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same natural finish· Both claim not settling into lines
Differences: Medium rather than light coverage· No skin-like finish claimed· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
90
Finish & visual result
73
Wear & performance
52
Skin suitability
50
Close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Medium rather than light coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim colour stability · Contains drying alcohol
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same natural finish· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Medium rather than light coverage· No skin-like finish claimed· No long-wear claim
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish & visual result
82
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
50
Close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Medium rather than light coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability
$25Ulta Beauty(product price)$15 less (38%)4.2 (812)
Matches: Same natural finish· Both claim a skin-like finish· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Medium rather than light coverage· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish & visual result
85
Wear & performance
58
Skin suitability
50
Close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Medium rather than light coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability
Retailer shade note: medium with neutral undertones
Matches: Same warm undertone· Both claim a blurring effect· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Matte rather than natural finish· Medium rather than light coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish & visual result
67
Wear & performance
70
Skin suitability
50
Close colour · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than natural finish · Medium rather than light coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability · Contains drying alcohol
Matches: Similar undertone (neutral vs warm)· Same natural finish· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Medium rather than light coverage· No skin-like finish claimed· No long-wear claim
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish & visual result
82
Wear & performance
52
Skin suitability
50
Close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Medium rather than light coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim colour stability
$38Ulta Beauty(product price)$2 less (5%)4.6 (3,895)
Matches: Both claim a skin-like finish· Both claim a blurring effect· Both claim transfer resistance
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Matte rather than natural finish· Medium rather than light coverage
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
70
Skin suitability
50
Close colour · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Matte rather than natural finish · Medium rather than light coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines
Matches: Similar undertone (neutral vs warm)· Both claim long-wearing· Both claim transfer resistance
Differences: Matte rather than natural finish· Medium rather than light coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish & visual result
58
Wear & performance
82
Skin suitability
50
Close colour · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than natural finish · Medium rather than light coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim colour stability · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: Medium to Dark, warm neutral undertones
Matches: Same natural finish· Both claim a blurring effect· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Olive rather than warm undertone· Medium rather than light coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish & visual result
82
Wear & performance
58
Skin suitability
50
Close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Olive rather than warm undertone · Medium rather than light coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability
Retailer shade note: MD1.5 - medium to medium-deep with warm undertones, and an olive tone
The closest shade to Fenty Beauty Eaze Drop Blur + Smooth Foundation Stick 12 (Medium light · Warm · golden undertone) in each concealer range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Concealer shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest match works
Rare Beauty True to Myself Natural Matte Longwear Foundation in 26 Medium Warm, against Fenty Beauty Eaze Drop Blur + Smooth Foundation Stick in 12. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade12Closest match26 Medium WarmHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall96
Colour60%93#e99c56#e79d60Very close colourColour difference 1.8 (0 is identical)
Finish35%56NaturalMatteSome differenceMatte finish rather than natural
Coverage30%80LightMediumCloseMedium coverage rather than light (buildable: one step of tolerance)
Skin-like finish20%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a skin-like finish
Blurring15%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a blurring or smoothing effect
Wear & performance15% of overall70
Longevity30%70Long-wearing8-hour wearSome differenceThe match claims 8-hour wear; your product says long-wearing without hours
Transfer resistance20%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim transfer resistance
Settling20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims not settling into pores or fine lines; the match does not list it
Colour stability15%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim colour stability (no oxidation)
Comfort15%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims a comfortable, lightweight feel; your product does not list it
Skin suitability5% of overall50
Skin type100%50Not publishedCombination, normal, oily, sensitiveSkin-type suitability not published for one product
Overall match 85/100Shade match 96/100High confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.