Eaze Drop Blur + Smooth Foundation Stick 18 dupes and alternatives Fenty Beauty
4.3 (1,119)·Tan · Warm · yellow undertone
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar foundation overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Same natural finish
Differences: Medium rather than light coverage· No skin-like finish claimed· Does not claim transfer resistance
Score details
Shade match
92
Finish & visual result
82
Wear & performance
58
Skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Medium rather than light coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability
Retailer shade note: MD3.3 - Medium-deep to deep with warm undertones, and a red tone
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same natural finish· Same light coverage
Differences: No blurring effect claimed· No long-wear claim· Does not claim transfer resistance
Score details
Shade match
89
Finish & visual result
91
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
50
Close colour · Natural · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: No blurring effect claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability
Matches: Very close colour· Same natural finish· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Olive rather than warm undertone· Medium rather than light coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish & visual result
82
Wear & performance
58
Skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Olive rather than warm undertone · Medium rather than light coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability · Contains listed fragrance · Contains drying alcohol
Retailer shade note: for tan skin with warm olive undertones
Matches: Same warm undertone· Both claim a skin-like finish· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Slightly lighter· Matte rather than natural finish· Medium rather than light coverage
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
70
Skin suitability
50
Close colour · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Matte rather than natural finish · Medium rather than light coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Contains drying alcohol
Matches: Very close colour· Same natural finish· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Olive rather than warm undertone· Medium rather than light coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish & visual result
82
Wear & performance
58
Skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Olive rather than warm undertone · Medium rather than light coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability
Retailer shade note: M5.25 - medium-deep to deep with neutral undertones, and an olive tone
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same natural finish· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Medium rather than light coverage· No skin-like finish claimed· No long-wear claim
Score details
Shade match
90
Finish & visual result
82
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
50
Close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Medium rather than light coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Radiant rather than natural finish· Medium rather than light coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
94
Finish & visual result
67
Wear & performance
49
Skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Radiant rather than natural finish · Medium rather than light coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability
Retailer shade note: tan skin with warm, golden undertones
$25Ulta Beauty(product price)$15 less (38%)4.2 (812)
Matches: Very close colour· Same natural finish· Both claim a skin-like finish
Differences: Olive rather than warm undertone· Medium rather than light coverage· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish & visual result
85
Wear & performance
58
Skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Olive rather than warm undertone · Medium rather than light coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability
Retailer shade note: medium deep with olive undertones
Matches: Both claim a skin-like finish· Both claim a blurring effect· Both claim transfer resistance
Differences: Slightly lighter· Olive rather than warm undertone· Matte rather than natural finish
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
70
Skin suitability
50
Close colour · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Olive rather than warm undertone · Matte rather than natural finish · Medium rather than light coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines
Matches: Same natural finish· Both claim a skin-like finish· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Medium rather than light coverage· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish & visual result
85
Wear & performance
58
Skin suitability
50
Close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Medium rather than light coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability
Retailer shade note: medium deep with neutral undertones
$24Ulta Beauty(product price)$16 less (40%)3.9 (396)
Matches: Very close colour· Similar undertone (neutral vs warm)· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Radiant rather than natural finish· Medium rather than light coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
92
Finish & visual result
58
Wear & performance
61
Skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Radiant rather than natural finish · Medium rather than light coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability · Contains listed fragrance
Matches: Both claim a skin-like finish· Both claim a blurring effect· Both claim transfer resistance
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Matte rather than natural finish· Medium rather than light coverage
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
70
Skin suitability
50
Close colour · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Matte rather than natural finish · Medium rather than light coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Contains drying alcohol
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim a skin-like finish· Both claim not settling into lines
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Matte rather than natural finish· Medium rather than light coverage
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish & visual result
70
Wear & performance
70
Skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Matte rather than natural finish · Medium rather than light coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance
Retailer shade note: medium with neutral undertones
$18.99Ulta Beauty(product price)$21.01 less (53%)4.4 (40,035)
Matches: Very close colour· Same natural finish· Both claim transfer resistance
Differences: Full rather than light coverage· No skin-like finish claimed· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish & visual result
61
Wear & performance
70
Skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Full rather than light coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Contains listed fragrance · Contains drying alcohol
$22Ulta Beauty(product price)$18 less (45%)3.5 (42)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same natural finish
Differences: Buildable rather than light coverage· No skin-like finish claimed· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
89
Finish & visual result
73
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
50
Close colour · Natural · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Buildable rather than light coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability
$29Ulta Beauty(product price)$11 less (28%)4.6 (558)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Both claim long-wearing· Both claim not settling into lines
Differences: Natural matte rather than natural finish· Full rather than light coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
89
Finish & visual result
53
Wear & performance
70
Skin suitability
50
Close colour · Natural matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural matte rather than natural finish · Full rather than light coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim colour stability
The closest shade to Fenty Beauty Eaze Drop Blur + Smooth Foundation Stick 18 (Tan · Warm · yellow undertone) in each concealer range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Concealer shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest shade match works
Clinique Beyond Perfecting Foundation + Concealer in WN 112 Ginger, against Fenty Beauty Eaze Drop Blur + Smooth Foundation Stick in 18. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade18Closest shade matchWN 112 GingerHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall94
Colour60%96#c07736#be783dLooks identicalColour difference 1.2 (0 is identical)
Depth15%100TanTanSameDepth difference: 0.1
Retailer descriptionMedium tanMediumSome differenceRetailer descriptions one depth band apart
Coverage30%40LightFullDifferentFull coverage rather than light (buildable: one step of tolerance)
Skin-like finish20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a skin-like finish; the match does not list it
Blurring15%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a blurring or smoothing effect; the match does not list it
Wear & performance15% of overall58
Longevity30%70Long-wearing24-hour wearSome differenceThe match claims 24-hour wear; your product says long-wearing without hours
Transfer resistance20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims transfer resistance; the match does not list it
Settling20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims not settling into pores or fine lines; the match does not list it
Colour stability15%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim colour stability (no oxidation)
Comfort15%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims a comfortable, lightweight feel; your product does not list it
Skin suitability5% of overall50
Skin type100%50Not publishedNormal, dry, oilySkin-type suitability not published for one product
Overall match 78/100Shade match 94/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Iconic London Super Smoother Blurring Skin Tint in Warm Tan, against Fenty Beauty Eaze Drop Blur + Smooth Foundation Stick in 18. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade18Closest overall alternativeWarm TanHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall92
Colour60%89#c07736#c57e43Very close colourColour difference 2.5 (0 is identical)
Depth15%94TanMedium tanCloseDepth difference: 3.4
Retailer descriptionMedium tanNot statedNo depth word in one descriptionNot compared
Coverage30%80LightMediumCloseMedium coverage rather than light (buildable: one step of tolerance)
Skin-like finish20%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a skin-like finish
Blurring15%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a blurring or smoothing effect
Wear & performance15% of overall49
Longevity30%70Long-wearing12-hour wearSome differenceThe match claims 12-hour wear; your product says long-wearing without hours
Transfer resistance20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims transfer resistance; the match does not list it
Settling20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims not settling into pores or fine lines; the match does not list it
Colour stability15%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims colour stability (no oxidation); the match does not list it
Comfort15%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims a comfortable, lightweight feel; your product does not list it
Skin suitability5% of overall50
Skin type100%50Not publishedCombination, dry, normal, oily, sensitiveSkin-type suitability not published for one product
Overall match 84/100Shade match 92/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Ulta Beauty
SephoraCosts $15 more
