Eaze Drop Blur + Smooth Foundation Stick 4 dupes and alternatives Fenty Beauty
4.3 (1,119)·Light · Cool undertone
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar foundation overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Very close colour· Same cool undertone· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Matte rather than natural finish· Full rather than light coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
93
Finish & visual result
55
Wear & performance
73
Skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than natural finish · Full rather than light coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim colour stability · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: light to medium skin with a balance of warm & cool undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim a skin-like finish· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Olive rather than cool undertone· Matte rather than natural finish· Medium rather than light coverage
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
70
Skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Olive rather than cool undertone · Matte rather than natural finish · Medium rather than light coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines
Matches: Very close colour· Same natural finish· Both claim a skin-like finish
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Full rather than light coverage· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish & visual result
73
Wear & performance
65
Skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Full rather than light coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability
Retailer shade note: Light with Warm Neutral Undertones
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Both claim transfer resistance· Both claim not settling into lines
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Matte rather than natural finish· Full rather than light coverage
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish & visual result
46
Wear & performance
82
Skin suitability
50
Looks identical · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Matte rather than natural finish · Full rather than light coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed
Retailer shade note: light with neutral undertones
The closest shade to Fenty Beauty Eaze Drop Blur + Smooth Foundation Stick 4 (Light · Cool undertone) in each concealer range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Concealer shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest shade match works
ILIA Super Serum Skin Tint SPF 40 in Kai ST6.5, against Fenty Beauty Eaze Drop Blur + Smooth Foundation Stick in 4. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade4Closest shade matchKai ST6.5How they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall98
Colour60%97#f0b083#eeb187Looks identicalColour difference 0.9 (0 is identical)
Depth15%100LightLightSameDepth difference: 0.1
Retailer descriptionLight mediumLight mediumBoth described as light mediumThe retailers describe the same depth
Finish35%56NaturalRadiantSome differenceRadiant finish rather than natural
Coverage30%100LightLightSameSame light coverage
Skin-like finish20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a skin-like finish; the match does not list it
Blurring15%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a blurring or smoothing effect
Wear & performance15% of overall · 4 of 5 compared40
Longevity30%40Long-wearingNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims long wear; the match does not list it
Transfer resistance20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims transfer resistance; the match does not list it
Settling20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims not settling into pores or fine lines; the match does not list it
Colour stability15%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims colour stability (no oxidation); the match does not list it
Comfort15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists a comfortable, lightweight feel
Skin suitability5% of overall50
Skin type100%50Not publishedNormal, dry, sensitiveSkin-type suitability not published for one product
Overall match 81/100Shade match 98/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Lancôme Teint Idole Ultra Wear Care and Glow Foundation in 245C, against Fenty Beauty Eaze Drop Blur + Smooth Foundation Stick in 4. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade4Closest overall alternative245CHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall98
Colour60%98#f0b083#f3b385Looks identicalColour difference 0.8 (0 is identical)
Depth15%98LightLightSameDepth difference: 1.5
Retailer descriptionLight mediumLightSome differenceRetailer descriptions one depth band apart
Coverage30%80LightMediumCloseMedium coverage rather than light (buildable: one step of tolerance)
Skin-like finish20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a skin-like finish; the match does not list it
Blurring15%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a blurring or smoothing effect; the match does not list it
Wear & performance15% of overall · 4 of 5 compared65
Longevity30%70Long-wearing24-hour wearSome differenceThe match claims 24-hour wear; your product says long-wearing without hours
Transfer resistance20%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim transfer resistance
Settling20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims not settling into pores or fine lines; the match does not list it
Colour stability15%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims colour stability (no oxidation); the match does not list it
Comfort15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists a comfortable, lightweight feel
Skin suitability5% of overall50
Skin type100%50Not publishedNormal, combination, sensitiveSkin-type suitability not published for one product
Overall match 85/100Shade match 98/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.