Eaze Drop Lightweight Blurring Skin Tint 16 dupes and alternatives Fenty Beauty
4.5 (2,588)·Tan · Olive · neutral olive undertone
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar foundation overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Very close colour· Same natural finish· Claims long-wearing
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Medium rather than light coverage· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish & visual result
81
Wear & performance
59
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 23% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Medium rather than light coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Medium rather than light coverage· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish & visual result
81
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
80
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Medium rather than light coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for sensitive skin · Contains listed fragrance
Matches: Same natural finish· Claims long-wearing· Both claim transfer resistance
Differences: Slightly lighter· Slightly warmer undertone· Medium rather than light coverage
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish & visual result
81
Wear & performance
59
Skin suitability
60
Close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 23% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Slightly warmer undertone · Medium rather than light coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin
Matches: Same natural finish· Claims a skin-like finish· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly lighter· Slightly warmer undertone· Medium rather than light coverage
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish & visual result
73
Wear & performance
66
Skin suitability
100
Close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 17% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Slightly warmer undertone · Medium rather than light coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance
Matches: Very close colour· Same natural finish· Claims long-wearing
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Medium rather than light coverage· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish & visual result
81
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
20
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 21% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Medium rather than light coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance · Not marketed for combination/normal/oily/sensitive skin · Contains listed fragrance
Matches: Same natural finish· Claims long-wearing· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone· Medium rather than light coverage· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish & visual result
81
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
20
Close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 21% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone · Medium rather than light coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance · Not marketed for combination/normal/oily/sensitive skin · Contains listed fragrance
Matches: Same natural finish· Claims a skin-like finish· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone· Medium rather than light coverage· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish & visual result
73
Wear & performance
66
Skin suitability
20
Close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone · Medium rather than light coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance · Not marketed for combination/dry/normal/oily skin
Retailer shade note: medium tan, neutral undertones
Differences: Slightly lighter· Slightly warmer undertone· Medium rather than light coverage
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish & visual result
81
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
80
Close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Slightly warmer undertone · Medium rather than light coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for sensitive skin · Contains listed fragrance
The closest shade to Fenty Beauty Eaze Drop Lightweight Blurring Skin Tint 16 (Tan · Olive · neutral olive undertone) in each concealer range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Concealer shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest shade match works
Chanel LES BEIGES Water-Fresh Complexion Touch in BO73, against Fenty Beauty Eaze Drop Lightweight Blurring Skin Tint in 16. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade16Closest shade matchBO73How they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall86
Colour60%93#a87e54#af8157Very close colourColour difference 1.9 (0 is identical)
Depth15%96TanTanSameDepth difference: 2.3
Retailer descriptionMediumNot statedNo depth word in one descriptionNot compared
Overall match 83/100Shade match 86/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Armani Beauty Luminous Silk Foundation in 7.6, against Fenty Beauty Eaze Drop Lightweight Blurring Skin Tint in 16. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade16Closest overall alternative7.6How they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall86
Colour60%89#a87e54#b18055Very close colourColour difference 2.4 (0 is identical)
Depth15%96TanTanSameDepth difference: 2.2
Retailer descriptionMediumMedium tanSome differenceRetailer descriptions one depth band apart
Overall match 83/100Shade match 86/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Ulta Beauty
SephoraCosts $3 more
Walmart
