Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar lip gloss overall: shade match 50%, finish and visual result 25%, wear and performance 15%, comfort and suitability 10%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar lip gloss on shade, finish, wear and comfort together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar lip gloss on shade, finish, wear and comfort together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same shine: shimmer· Both claim non-sticky
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Coral rather than orange· Pearl rather than shimmer (shimmer)
Score details
Shade match
70
Finish & visual result
90
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Coral rather than orange · Pearl rather than shimmer (shimmer) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Retailer shade note: peachy coral with gold and pink pearl
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same shine: shimmer· Same shimmer: shimmer
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Peach rather than orange· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
64
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & suitability
70
Slight colour difference · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Peach rather than orange · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim non-sticky
CoverGirl Clean Fresh Yummy Lip Gloss in My Main Squeeze, against Fenty Beauty Gloss Bomb Universal Lip Luminizer in MANGO MARGZ. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeMANGO MARGZClosest shade matchMy Main SqueezeHow they compareScore
Shade match50% of overall85
Colour55%75#f69069#ff8052Close colourColour difference 4.3 (0 is identical)
Depth15%94LightLightSameDepth difference 3.3 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone15%100WarmWarmSameSame product undertone
Colour family15%100OrangeOrangeSameSame colour family
Finish & visual result25% of overall · 1 of 3 compared89
Shine40%89ShimmerSheer tintCloseLess shine
Transparency35%—not comparableNot listedTintedNot listed for eitherA transparency not listed for one product
Shimmer25%—not comparableShimmerNot listedNot listed for eitherShimmer not listed for one product
Wear & performance15% of overall40
Longevity100%40Long-wearingNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims long wear; the match does not list it
Comfort & suitability10% of overall100
Non-sticky50%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a non-sticky feel
Overall match 81/100Shade match 85/100High confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Anastasia Beverly Hills Universal Luminous Tinted Lip Gloss in Cantalope, against Fenty Beauty Gloss Bomb Universal Lip Luminizer in MANGO MARGZ. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeMANGO MARGZClosest overall alternativeCantalopeHow they compareScore
Shade match50% of overall76
Colour55%68#f69069#e89e7cSlight colour differenceColour difference 5.2 (0 is identical)
Depth15%96LightLightSameDepth difference 2.5 on the 0–100 scale
Finish & visual result25% of overall · 2 of 3 compared90
Shine40%100ShimmerShimmerSameSame shine level
Transparency35%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists a transparency
Shimmer25%75ShimmerSparkleSome differenceSparkle rather than shimmer
Wear & performance15% of overall100
Longevity100%100Long-wearingLong-wearingSameBoth products claim long wear
Comfort & suitability10% of overall70
Non-sticky50%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a non-sticky feel
Hydration50%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims hydration; the match does not list it
Overall match 83/100Shade match 76/100High confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
31 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Ulta Beauty
SephoraCosts $4 more
