Match Stix Contour Skinstick Amber dupes and alternatives Fenty Beauty
4.2 (2,952)·Bronze · Cool · Light
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar contour overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 25%, wear and performance 15%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar contour on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar contour on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same format: stick· Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Taupe rather than bronze· Does not claim comfort
Score details
Shade match
69
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Taupe rather than bronze · Does not claim comfort · Normal, Oily, Sensitive rather than normal, dry, oily (skin types)
Retailer shade note: shadow for fair to light skin tones with neutral undertones
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same format: stick· Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone· Brown rather than bronze· Does not claim comfort
Score details
Shade match
63
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone · Brown rather than bronze · Does not claim comfort · Normal, Oily, Sensitive rather than normal, dry, oily (skin types)
Retailer shade note: shadow for fair to light skin tones with neutral to golden undertones
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: buildable
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Taupe rather than bronze· 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
66
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
64
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Taupe rather than bronze · 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: buildable· Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Neutral rather than cool undertone· Brown rather than bronze
Score details
Shade match
65
Finish, pigmentation & format
89
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Neutral rather than cool undertone · Brown rather than bronze · Liquid rather than stick (format) · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same pigmentation: buildable· Same format: stick· Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Neutral rather than cool undertone· Does not claim comfort
Score details
Shade match
64
Finish, pigmentation & format
87
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
48
Visibly different colour · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Neutral rather than cool undertone · Does not claim comfort · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than normal, dry, oily (skin types)
Matches: Same format: stick· Same longevity: long-wearing· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Brown rather than bronze· Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
65
Finish, pigmentation & format
80
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Slight colour difference · Natural · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Brown rather than bronze · Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Normal, Combination rather than normal, dry, oily (skin types)
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: buildable· Same format: stick
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Neutral rather than cool undertone· 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
60
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
64
Visibly different colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Neutral rather than cool undertone · 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Retailer shade note: light-medium with neutral undertones
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Golden rather than bronze· Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish, pigmentation & format
77
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
59
Close colour · Natural · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Golden rather than bronze · Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Normal, Combination, Sensitive rather than normal, dry, oily (skin types)
Sold as bronzer, rated here for use as contour (suited)
Retailer shade note: light-medium to tan with neutral undertones
Matches: Same cool undertone· Both claim comfort· Claims hydration
Differences: Lighter· Golden rather than bronze· Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish, pigmentation & format
77
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
59
Slight colour difference · Natural · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Golden rather than bronze · Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Normal, Combination, Sensitive rather than normal, dry, oily (skin types)
Sold as bronzer, rated here for use as contour (suited)
Retailer shade note: fair to light with cool undertones
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same format: stick· Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Neutral rather than cool undertone
Score details
Shade match
50
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Neutral rather than cool undertone · Taupe rather than bronze · Does not claim comfort · Normal, Oily, Sensitive rather than normal, dry, oily (skin types)
Retailer shade note: shadow for fair to light skin tones with neutral to rosy undertones
Matches: Same format: stick· Same longevity: long-wearing· Both claim comfort
Differences: Lighter· Taupe rather than bronze· Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
57
Finish, pigmentation & format
80
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Close colour · Natural · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Taupe rather than bronze · Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Normal, Combination rather than normal, dry, oily (skin types)
Matches: Same pigmentation: buildable· Same format: stick· Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Warm rather than cool undertone· Golden rather than bronze
Score details
Shade match
52
Finish, pigmentation & format
87
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
72
Visibly different colour · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Warm rather than cool undertone · Golden rather than bronze · Dry, Combination, Oily rather than normal, dry, oily (skin types)
Sold as bronzer, rated here for use as contour (possible)
Retailer shade note: warm golden undertone, natural finish for medium skin tones
Differences: Dewy rather than matte (finish)· Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish, pigmentation & format
50
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Slight colour difference · Dewy · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Dewy rather than matte (finish) · Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than normal, dry, oily (skin types)
Sold as bronzer, rated here for use as contour (possible)
Retailer shade note: a cool bronze shade fused with Diffused Light to mimic a ray of warm sunlight. (Ideal for light/medium complexions)
Morphe Shapelifter Micro Contour Stick in Structured, against Fenty Beauty Match Stix Contour Skinstick in Amber. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeAmberClosest shade matchStructuredHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall88
Colour50%88#977e6a#927f70Very close colourColour difference 2.6 (0 is identical)
Depth25%100LightLightSameDepth difference 0.1 on the 0–100 scale
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 1 of 3 compared100
Comfort40%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable feel
Hydration20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists hydration
Skin types40%—not comparableNormal, Dry, OilyNot listedNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 88/100Shade match 88/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
KimChi Chic Beauty Thailor Contour Duo in 02 Mocha, against Fenty Beauty Match Stix Contour Skinstick in Amber. Matched on pan 2. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeAmberClosest overall alternative02 MochaHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall80
Colour50%80#977e6a#9f7d61Close colourColour difference 3.6 (0 is identical)
Depth25%99LightLightSameDepth difference 0.6 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableCoolNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 1 of 3 compared100
Comfort40%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable feel
Hydration20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists hydration
Skin types40%—not comparableNormal, Dry, OilyNot listedNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 89/100Shade match 80/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
31 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Ulta Beauty$20 less (61%)
Sephora
