Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar concealer overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar concealer on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar concealer on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same matte finish· Claims a blurring effect· Both claim not settling into lines
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Slightly deeper· Warm rather than olive undertone
Score details
Shade match
70
Finish & visual result
81
Wear & performance
82
Skin suitability
75
Slight colour difference · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Slightly deeper · Warm rather than olive undertone · Medium rather than full coverage · Not marketed for dry skin
Retailer shade note: L2.6 - Light to medium with warm undertones
Matches: Same matte finish· Same full coverage· Claims a blurring effect
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Slightly deeper· Warm rather than olive undertone
Score details
Shade match
66
Finish & visual result
89
Wear & performance
82
Skin suitability
75
Slight colour difference · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 18% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Slightly deeper · Warm rather than olive undertone · Not marketed for dry skin · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: fair skin with warm, golden undertones
Matches: Same matte finish· Claims a blurring effect· Both claim not settling into lines
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Slightly deeper· Warm rather than olive undertone
Score details
Shade match
59
Finish & visual result
81
Wear & performance
82
Skin suitability
75
Visibly different colour · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Slightly deeper · Warm rather than olive undertone · Medium rather than full coverage · Not marketed for dry skin
Retailer shade note: L2.8 - Light to medium with warm undertones, and a peach tone
The closest shade to Fenty Beauty Pro Filt'r Instant Retouch Longwear Liquid Concealer 145 (Very fair · Olive · warm olive undertone) in each foundation range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Foundation shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest shade match works
Rare Beauty Liquid Touch Brightening Concealer in 100W, against Fenty Beauty Pro Filt'r Instant Retouch Longwear Liquid Concealer in 145. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade145Closest shade match100WHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall86
Colour60%85#feebce#f7e3ccVery close colourColour difference 2.9 (0 is identical)
Overall match 76/100Shade match 86/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
NARS Soft Matte Complete Concealer in Nougatine, against Fenty Beauty Pro Filt'r Instant Retouch Longwear Liquid Concealer in 145. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade145Closest overall alternativeNougatineHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall78
Colour60%72#feebce#f6dbbfClose colourColour difference 4.7 (0 is identical)
Overall match 79/100Shade match 78/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
SephoraCosts $6 more
