Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same format: stick· Both claim crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Deeper· Shimmer rather than glitter (finish)· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish, pigmentation & format
72
Wear & performance
85
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 26% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Shimmer rather than glitter (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Matches: Both claim crease resistance· Claims comfort
Differences: Deeper· Shimmer rather than glitter (finish)· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish, pigmentation & format
64
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Shimmer rather than glitter (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than stick (format) · 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
$25Ulta Beauty(product price)$1 less (4%)4.8 (290)
Matches: Same longevity: long-wearing· Both claim crease resistance· Claims comfort
Differences: Shimmer rather than glitter (finish)· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Liquid rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish, pigmentation & format
64
Wear & performance
88
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Shimmer rather than glitter (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than stick (format) · Does not claim waterproof
Differences: Shimmer rather than glitter (finish)· Palette rather than stick (format)· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish, pigmentation & format
61
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Shimmer rather than glitter (finish) · Palette rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Retailer shade note: white chocolate, rosy velvet, & brownie bite
Differences: Deeper· Shimmer rather than glitter (finish)· Palette rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish, pigmentation & format
69
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Shimmer rather than glitter (finish) · Palette rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Retailer shade note: champagne sparkle with pink flip pearl, copper sparkle with pink flip pearl
Matches: Same pigmentation: opaque· Same format: stick· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Nude rather than golden· Shimmer rather than glitter (finish)· 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
69
Finish, pigmentation & format
79
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Nude rather than golden · Shimmer rather than glitter (finish) · 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
$11.99Ulta Beauty(product price)$14.01 less (54%)4.6 (13,914)
Matches: Same pigmentation: opaque· Same format: stick· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Deeper· Bronze rather than golden· Shimmer rather than glitter (finish)
Score details
Shade match
69
Finish, pigmentation & format
79
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Bronze rather than golden · Shimmer rather than glitter (finish) · 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Differences: Nude rather than golden· Shimmer rather than glitter (finish)· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish, pigmentation & format
62
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Looks identical · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Nude rather than golden · Shimmer rather than glitter (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Powder rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Stila Liqua-Play Eye Shadow in Kitten Shimmer, against Fenty Beauty Shadowstix Longwear Eyeshadow Stick in Sip & Sparkle. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeSip & SparkleClosest shade matchKitten ShimmerHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall91
Colour60%86#eabeaa#eabbadVery close colourColour difference 2.9 (0 is identical)
Depth15%98LightLightSameDepth difference 1.0 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100GoldenGoldenSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall64
Finish65%68GlitterShimmerSome differenceShimmer finish rather than glitter
Pigmentation20%65OpaqueBuildableSome differenceBuildable rather than opaque
Format15%45StickLiquidSome differenceLiquid rather than stick
Wear & performance10% of overall88
Longevity50%100Long-wearingLong-wearingSameBoth products claim long wear
Overall match 80/100Shade match 91/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Alleyoop 11th Hour Cream Eyeshadow & Liner Stick in Baby Pearl, against Fenty Beauty Shadowstix Longwear Eyeshadow Stick in Sip & Sparkle. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeSip & SparkleClosest overall alternativeBaby PearlHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall90
Colour60%85#eabeaa#ddbaa8Very close colourColour difference 3.0 (0 is identical)
Depth15%94LightLightSameDepth difference 3.3 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100GoldenGoldenSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall79
Finish65%68GlitterShimmerSome differenceShimmer finish rather than glitter
Overall match 85/100Shade match 90/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.