All-in-Wonder Concealer + Foundation Medium dupes and alternatives Fièra Cosmetics
Light medium · Cool · pink undertone
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar foundation overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same medium coverage· Both claim a skin-like finish
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· No blurring effect claimed· Does not claim not settling into lines
Score details
Shade match
89
Finish & visual result
86
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
60
Looks identical · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for normal/sensitive skin
$12.59$17.99Ulta Beauty$32.41 less (72%)4.2 (5,328)
Matches: Very close colour· Same radiant finish· Both claim a skin-like finish
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Full rather than medium coverage· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish & visual result
85
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
100
Very close colour · Radiant · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Full rather than medium coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Contains drying alcohol
$17.99Ulta Beauty(product price)$27.01 less (60%)4.2 (5,328)
Matches: Very close colour· Same radiant finish· Both claim a skin-like finish
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Full rather than medium coverage· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish & visual result
85
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
100
Very close colour · Radiant · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Full rather than medium coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Contains drying alcohol
Matches: Very close colour· Same medium coverage· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish & visual result
64
Wear & performance
66
Skin suitability
100
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines
Matches: Very close colour· Same medium coverage· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish & visual result
64
Wear & performance
66
Skin suitability
100
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines
Matches: Very close colour· Same cool undertone· Claims 12-hour wear
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish· Full rather than medium coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
92
Finish & visual result
58
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
100
Very close colour · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish · Full rather than medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim a lightweight feel
Matches: Very close colour· Same cool undertone· Claims long-wearing
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish· Full rather than medium coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
92
Finish & visual result
58
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
100
Very close colour · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish · Full rather than medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Contains listed fragrance
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim a skin-like finish· Claims long-wearing
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Full rather than medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish & visual result
70
Wear & performance
51
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Full rather than medium coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for combination/sensitive skin
Retailer shade note: medium skin with neutral undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Same medium coverage· Claims long-wearing
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish & visual result
64
Wear & performance
72
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Not marketed for dry/sensitive skin
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Light rather than medium coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish & visual result
73
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
100
Very close colour · Radiant · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Light rather than medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim a lightweight feel
Matches: Both claim a skin-like finish· Claims long-wearing· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly lighter· Neutral rather than cool undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish & visual result
76
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
80
Colour not compared · Natural · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Neutral rather than cool undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Buildable rather than medium coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for sensitive skin
Matches: Both claim a skin-like finish· Claims long-wearing· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Buildable rather than medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish & visual result
76
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
80
Colour not compared · Natural · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Buildable rather than medium coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for sensitive skin
Matches: Very close colour· Similar undertone (neutral vs cool)· Claims 24-hour wear
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish· Full rather than medium coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
90
Finish & visual result
58
Wear & performance
51
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish · Full rather than medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for combination/sensitive skin
Matches: Very close colour· Same medium coverage· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Matte rather than radiant finish· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish & visual result
48
Wear & performance
66
Skin suitability
100
Very close colour · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Matte rather than radiant finish · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines
Matches: Very close colour· Same radiant finish· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly lighter· Neutral rather than cool undertone· Light rather than medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish & visual result
73
Wear & performance
66
Skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Radiant · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Neutral rather than cool undertone · Light rather than medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for combination/oily/sensitive skin
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim a skin-like finish· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Matte rather than radiant finish· Full rather than medium coverage· Does not claim not settling into lines
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish & visual result
63
Wear & performance
51
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than radiant finish · Full rather than medium coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for dry/sensitive skin
Matches: Very close colour· Same medium coverage· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish & visual result
73
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for combination/oily skin · Contains drying alcohol
Differences: Matte rather than radiant finish· Full rather than medium coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish & visual result
42
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
100
Very close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than radiant finish · Full rather than medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim a lightweight feel
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Matte rather than radiant finish· Full rather than medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish & visual result
51
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
80
Very close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Matte rather than radiant finish · Full rather than medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for sensitive skin
Matches: Both claim a blurring effect· Claims long-wearing· Adds SPF 15
Differences: Slightly lighter· Matte rather than radiant finish· Full rather than medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish & visual result
51
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
100
Colour not compared · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Matte rather than radiant finish · Full rather than medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim a lightweight feel
Matches: Very close colour· Claims long-wearing· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly deeper· Slightly warmer undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish
Score details
Shade match
70
Finish & visual result
64
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
20
Very close colour · Natural · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Slightly warmer undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Buildable rather than medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for combination/dry/oily/sensitive skin
The closest shade to Fièra Cosmetics All-in-Wonder Concealer + Foundation Medium (Light medium · Cool · pink undertone) in each concealer range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Concealer shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest shade match works
Basma The Foundation Stick for Hydrating, Buildable Coverage and Natural Finish in 30, against Fièra Cosmetics All-in-Wonder Concealer + Foundation in Medium. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeMediumClosest shade match30How they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall93
Colour60%90#e3af99#efb49cVery close colourColour difference 2.3 (0 is identical)
Overall match 79/100Shade match 93/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
bareMinerals ORIGINAL Loose Talc-Free Mineral Powder Foundation SPF 15 in Medium 10, against Fièra Cosmetics All-in-Wonder Concealer + Foundation in Medium. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeMediumClosest overall alternativeMedium 10How they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall91
Colour60%86#e3af99#e2b49aVery close colourColour difference 2.8 (0 is identical)
Overall match 87/100Shade match 91/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Sephora
Ulta Beauty$1 less (2%)
