Flawless Jade Breathable Longwear Cushion Foundation N25 Rippling Lotus dupes and alternatives Florasis
5.0 (11)·Fair · Neutral undertone
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar foundation overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
$39Ulta Beauty(product price)$8 less (17%)4.3 (1,754)
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same matte finish· Same medium coverage
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· No skin-like finish claimed· No long-wear claim
Score details
Shade match
90
Finish & visual result
88
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
40
Looks identical · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · No skin-like finish claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim transfer resistance · Not marketed for sensitive skin
$15.99Ulta Beauty(product price)$31.01 less (66%)4.2 (5,524)
Matches: Very close colour· Same matte finish· Both claim transfer resistance
Differences: Slightly lighter· Slightly warmer undertone· Full rather than medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish & visual result
67
Wear & performance
86
Skin suitability
76
Very close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Slightly lighter · Slightly warmer undertone · Full rather than medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed
$12.99Ulta Beauty(product price)$34.01 less (72%)4.4 (41,209)
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same matte finish· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Full rather than medium coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish & visual result
67
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
50
Looks identical · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Full rather than medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim a lightweight feel
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same medium coverage· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Natural rather than matte finish· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish & visual result
64
Wear & performance
86
Skin suitability
0
Looks identical · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Natural rather than matte finish · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Both claim a skin-like finish· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Natural rather than matte finish· Buildable rather than medium coverage· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish & visual result
76
Wear & performance
82
Skin suitability
38
Colour not compared · Natural · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Natural rather than matte finish · Buildable rather than medium coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance · Not marketed for sensitive skin
$9Ulta Beauty(product price)$38 less (81%)4.3 (644)
Matches: Very close colour· Same matte finish· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Slightly lighter· Full rather than medium coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish & visual result
73
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Slightly lighter · Full rather than medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for sensitive skin
Matches: Very close colour· Same medium coverage· Both claim a skin-like finish
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Natural rather than matte finish· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish & visual result
76
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
76
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Natural rather than matte finish · No blurring effect claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim transfer resistance
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Both claim a skin-like finish· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Slightly deeper· Natural rather than matte finish· Buildable rather than medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish & visual result
76
Wear & performance
82
Skin suitability
38
Colour not compared · Natural · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Slightly deeper · Natural rather than matte finish · Buildable rather than medium coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance · Not marketed for sensitive skin
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Both claim long-wearing· Adds SPF 50
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Natural rather than matte finish· Full rather than medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish & visual result
52
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
76
Looks identical · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Natural rather than matte finish · Full rather than medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim a lightweight feel
Retailer shade note: taupe shade with warm undertones
$14Ulta Beauty(product price)$33 less (70%)4.1 (33)
Matches: Very close colour· Same neutral undertone· Both claim a skin-like finish
Differences: Radiant rather than matte finish· Light rather than medium coverage· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
90
Finish & visual result
54
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
76
Very close colour · Radiant · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Radiant rather than matte finish · Light rather than medium coverage · No blurring effect claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim transfer resistance
Matches: Very close colour· Same medium coverage· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Slightly lighter· Slightly warmer undertone· Natural rather than matte finish
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish & visual result
64
Wear & performance
86
Skin suitability
0
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Slightly lighter · Slightly warmer undertone · Natural rather than matte finish · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim long-wearing· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Luminous rather than matte finish· Buildable rather than medium coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish & visual result
44
Wear & performance
82
Skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Luminous · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Luminous rather than matte finish · Buildable rather than medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance
$14Ulta Beauty(product price)$33 less (70%)4.1 (33)
Matches: Very close colour· Same neutral undertone· Both claim a skin-like finish
Differences: Slightly lighter· Radiant rather than matte finish· Light rather than medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish & visual result
54
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
76
Very close colour · Radiant · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Slightly lighter · Radiant rather than matte finish · Light rather than medium coverage · No blurring effect claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim transfer resistance
Matches: Very close colour· Same matte finish· Adds SPF 28
Differences: Full rather than medium coverage· No skin-like finish claimed· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish & visual result
67
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
76
Very close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Full rather than medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim a lightweight feel
Matches: Very close colour· Same medium coverage· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Natural rather than matte finish· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish & visual result
64
Wear & performance
82
Skin suitability
0
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Natural rather than matte finish · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance · Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin
Matches: Very close colour· Same medium coverage· Both claim a skin-like finish
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Natural rather than matte finish· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish & visual result
76
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
0
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Natural rather than matte finish · No blurring effect claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin
$14Ulta Beauty(product price)$33 less (70%)4.1 (33)
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim a skin-like finish· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone· Radiant rather than matte finish· Light rather than medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish & visual result
54
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
76
Very close colour · Radiant · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone · Radiant rather than matte finish · Light rather than medium coverage · No blurring effect claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim transfer resistance
The closest shade to Florasis Flawless Jade Breathable Longwear Cushion Foundation N25 Rippling Lotus (Fair · Neutral undertone) in each concealer range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Concealer shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest shade match works
Clinique Acne Solutions Liquid Makeup Foundation in CN 52 Neutral, against Florasis Flawless Jade Breathable Longwear Cushion Foundation in N25 Rippling Lotus. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeN25 Rippling LotusClosest shade matchCN 52 NeutralHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall95
Colour60%93#e4c7a5#dcc2a0Very close colourColour difference 1.8 (0 is identical)
Depth15%95FairLightCloseDepth difference: 3.0
Retailer descriptionMediumNot statedNo depth word in one descriptionNot compared
Coverage30%100MediumMediumSameSame medium coverage
Skin-like finish20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a skin-like finish; the match does not list it
Blurring15%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a blurring or smoothing effect
Wear & performance15% of overall · 3 of 5 compared54
Longevity30%40Long-wearingNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims long wear; the match does not list it
Transfer resistance20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims transfer resistance; the match does not list it
Settling20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists not settling into pores or fine lines
Colour stability15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists colour stability (no oxidation)
Comfort15%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable, lightweight feel
Skin suitability5% of overall40
Skin type100%40Oily, sensitiveCombination, dry, oilyBoth marketed for oily skin
Overall match 84/100Shade match 95/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Live Tinted HUESTICK Complexion Stick in 19 Light, against Florasis Flawless Jade Breathable Longwear Cushion Foundation in N25 Rippling Lotus. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeN25 Rippling LotusClosest overall alternative19 LightHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall94
Colour60%90#e4c7a5#ddc2a6Very close colourColour difference 2.2 (0 is identical)
Depth15%96FairLightCloseDepth difference: 2.7
Retailer descriptionMediumNot statedNo depth word in one descriptionNot compared
Overall match 87/100Shade match 94/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Ulta Beauty(product price)Costs $6 more
Sephora
