Cloud Paint Gel Cream Blush Dusk dupes and alternatives Glossier
4.3 (1,304)·Brown / nude · Warm · Medium
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar blush overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 25%, wear and performance 15%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar blush on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar blush on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Same pigmentation: sheer
Differences: Peach rather than brown / nude· Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)· Normal, Dry, Combination rather than dry, combination, oily (skin types)
Score details
Shade match
89
Finish, pigmentation & format
89
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
72
Very close colour · Matte · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Peach rather than brown / nude · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than dry, combination, oily (skin types)
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Both claim comfort
Differences: Peach rather than brown / nude· Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)· Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish, pigmentation & format
82
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
72
Very close colour · Satin · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Peach rather than brown / nude · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than dry, combination, oily (skin types)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: natural· Same format: cream
Differences: Rose rather than brown / nude· Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)· Does not claim comfort
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Natural
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than brown / nude · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than dry, combination, oily (skin types)
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Both claim comfort
Differences: Rose rather than brown / nude· Dewy rather than natural (finish)· Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
90
Finish, pigmentation & format
66
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
92
Very close colour · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than brown / nude · Dewy rather than natural (finish) · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same pigmentation: sheer· Same format: cream
Differences: Dewy rather than natural (finish)· Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)· Does not claim comfort
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish, pigmentation & format
84
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
35
Close colour · Dewy · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Dewy rather than natural (finish) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Normal, Dry, Sensitive rather than dry, combination, oily (skin types)
Matches: Very close colour· Same finish: natural· Both claim comfort
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Rose rather than brown / nude· Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Very close colour · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Rose rather than brown / nude · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than cream (format) · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Differences: Dewy rather than natural (finish)· Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)· Liquid rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish, pigmentation & format
65
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
92
Close colour · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Dewy rather than natural (finish) · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than cream (format) · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Both claim comfort
Differences: Rose rather than brown / nude· Dewy rather than natural (finish)· Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
89
Finish, pigmentation & format
59
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
92
Very close colour · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than brown / nude · Dewy rather than natural (finish) · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Powder rather than cream (format) · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: natural· Same format: cream
Differences: Deeper· Rose rather than brown / nude· Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Natural
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Rose rather than brown / nude · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than dry, combination, oily (skin types)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: natural· Both claim comfort
Differences: Lighter· Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)· Liquid rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Slight colour difference · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than cream (format) · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Same finish: natural
Differences: Peach rather than brown / nude· Opaque rather than sheer (pigmentation)· Powder rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish, pigmentation & format
66
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Natural · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Peach rather than brown / nude · Opaque rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Powder rather than cream (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Retailer shade note: Rich Mid-Tone Rose Petal Pink Trio
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: natural· Same pigmentation: sheer
Differences: Lighter· Peach rather than brown / nude· Liquid rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
62
Slight colour difference · Natural · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Lighter · Peach rather than brown / nude · Liquid rather than cream (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same pigmentation: sheer
Differences: Shimmer rather than natural (finish)· Liquid rather than cream (format)· Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish, pigmentation & format
64
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
62
Close colour · Shimmer · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Shimmer rather than natural (finish) · Liquid rather than cream (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same pigmentation: sheer· Same format: cream
Differences: Peach rather than brown / nude· Dewy rather than natural (finish)· Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish, pigmentation & format
84
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
35
Close colour · Dewy · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Peach rather than brown / nude · Dewy rather than natural (finish) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Normal, Dry, Sensitive rather than dry, combination, oily (skin types)
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Peach rather than brown / nude· Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)· Powder rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish, pigmentation & format
64
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
48
Very close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Peach rather than brown / nude · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Powder rather than cream (format) · 16-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Normal, Combination, Oily rather than dry, combination, oily (skin types)
Differences: Peach rather than brown / nude· Dewy rather than natural (finish)· Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish, pigmentation & format
65
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
92
Close colour · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Peach rather than brown / nude · Dewy rather than natural (finish) · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than cream (format) · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Same format: cream
Differences: Terracotta rather than brown / nude· Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)· Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish, pigmentation & format
80
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
48
Very close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Terracotta rather than brown / nude · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Normal, Combination, Oily rather than dry, combination, oily (skin types)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Claims waterproof· Claims hydration
Differences: Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)· Powder rather than cream (format)· 24-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish, pigmentation & format
64
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
48
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Powder rather than cream (format) · 24-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than dry, combination, oily (skin types)
MAC Cosmetics Skinfinish Colorstruck Blush in Gingerly, against Glossier Cloud Paint Gel Cream Blush in Dusk. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeDuskClosest shade matchGingerlyHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall92
Colour55%86#d48170#d6846bVery close colourColour difference 2.9 (0 is identical)
Depth15%98MediumMediumSameDepth difference 1.2 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone15%100WarmWarmSameSame product undertone
Colour family15%100Brown / nudeBrown / nudeSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format25% of overall64
Finish50%78NaturalMatteCloseMatte finish rather than natural
Pigmentation25%65SheerBuildableSome differenceBuildable rather than sheer
Format25%35CreamPowderDifferentPowder rather than cream
Wear & performance15% of overall · 2 of 3 compared40
Longevity50%40Not listed12-hour wearSome differenceThe match claims long wear; your product does not list it
Transfer resistance30%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Waterproof20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims waterproof wear; your product does not list it
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 2 of 3 compared92
Comfort40%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable feel
Hydration20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists hydration
Overall match 77/100Shade match 92/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Patrick Ta Major Headlines Double-Take Crème & Powder Blush Duo in Not Too Much, against Glossier Cloud Paint Gel Cream Blush in Dusk. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeDuskClosest overall alternativeNot Too MuchHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall86
Colour55%76#d48170#d08b81Close colourColour difference 4.1 (0 is identical)
Depth15%95MediumMediumSameDepth difference 3.0 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone15%100WarmWarmSameSame product undertone
Colour family15%100Brown / nudeBrown / nudeSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format25% of overall · 2 of 3 compared100
Finish50%100NaturalNaturalSameSame natural finish
Pigmentation25%—not comparableSheerNot listedNot listed for eitherAn opacity not listed for one product
Format25%100CreamCreamSameBoth cream
Wear & performance15% of overall · 1 of 3 compared40
Longevity50%40Not listedLong-wearingSome differenceThe match claims long wear; your product does not list it
Transfer resistance30%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Overall match 81/100Shade match 86/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
SephoraCosts $18 more
